It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Axiom is Building the first Commercial Space Station Module, not Bigelow

page: 1
7

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 22 2020 @ 03:12 PM
link   
NASA has been seeking, since June officially[1], to place a commercial space station module and nearby free-flying platforms on the International Space Station. There was a bit of a surprise, at least for those involved with the space industry, when NASA announced they had awarded the slot for the first non-test, non-government owned module on the space station. Everyone had expected Bigelow Aerospace to be the winners. After all, they have flown two self-sufficient orbital test articles and then placed a small test module on the International Space Station. That makes them the front runners for winning the right to place the module, right?

Well, apparently not.



Axiom Space[2] won the slot[2,3,4,5]. In fact, Axion is planning on using the ISS as the base of operations as they build out their own space station. It will be built module by module on the ISS and then separated either before or at the time of the retirement of the International Space Station. The Axiom based station looks like something evolved from the technology of the current space station rather than diverging like the Bigelow plans.

In addition! Axiom has already booked its first flight to the ISS via a SpaceX Dragon 2 capsule[6,7].

Why didn't Bigelow actually get the contract? Bigelow has been around for far, far longer than Axiom has been. They have flown hardware already. They have even attached a test module for the ISS and, well, it's still there. What just happened?

One of these is a groaner and the other is...interesting. The first is if you look at the 'leadership team[8]' for Axiom and you will find a lot of NASA veterans. Including a former head of NASA. That suggests two things: first off, they speak NASA. Navigating NASA's contracting is nontrivial and these folks get it. And...it doesn't hurt to have all those ... personal relationships. cough,backroomdeal,cough[8]

The driving reason though, according to Bigelow[9], was that NASA told him upfront what the budget was: $500M-ish. He felt that wasn't enough. This is a surprise. He has argued he could do the thing for far, far less. Instead, he'll seek to bid on the free-fliers around the ISS, modules that will not support long term habitation like the one attached directly to the space station. So, it was his to win and he chose not to run. We will see if he actually builds a real space station off of the free fliers. Or will he bow out. again.

1. www.parabolicarc.com...
2. www.axiomspace.com...
3. newatlas.com...
4. www.parabolicarc.com...
5. www.engadget.com...
6. www.parabolicarc.com...
7. spacenews.com...
8. www.axiomspace.com...
9. spacenews.com...
edit on 22-3-2020 by anzha because: forgot a pic...oops.




posted on Mar, 23 2020 @ 10:26 PM
link   
and Bigelow just laid off everyone...

www.parabolicarc.com...



 
7

log in

join