It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Fromabove
I just have to say that there is a news report that the ACLU lost a case in court on a "Ten Comandments" display. I will sleep well tonight. The Judge told the lawyers for the ACLU that the nation was getting tired of unreasonable people continuously trying to rid the nation of Christian expression. There is still hope for all of us to free in America.
Fromabove
Originally posted by gps777
reduces motivation?well that is your own personal opinion in what motivates you agreed?
Originally posted by spamandham
I suppose it could just be a reflection of myself. When I was a Christian, although I didn't like oppression, I satisfied myself knowing that the suffering of this world wasn't ultimately important since the prize was on the other side. Jesus is said to have endured the ultimate oppression without a fight, because of the eternal consequences.
If I believe all injustice will be rectified, I have less motivation to see toward such rectification myself. I have a hard time believing I'm unique in this regard.
Originally posted by BradKellBrrexkl
As for the Indigo Children or not caring about responses, I do care about what I am learning and hearing here.
Originally posted by BradKellBrrexkl
However, I make it a point not to respond to things I know nothing about... or at least can not form a decent if not rickety theory on. Leads to nothing. With the Indigo Children, I am reading on them since I had no clue what they were when you mentioned them. I had most assuredly heard the term, but I know not what it means. I will get back to you once I have studied.
Originally posted by BradKellBrrexkl
Now, even if your Indigo Children does debunk my blanket statement (and it may, I actually though you were going to come with Buddism or other pacifist groups... most of who are not Religions or Do Convert) it still does not prove that Christianity does not attempt this... and in attempting this does not FORCE Christianity upon others.
Originally posted by BradKellBrrexkl
I do tend to try to stay on topic, so thanks for noticing!
Originally posted by BradKellBrrexkl
P.S. I just want people to realize that no love is lost here. I am fully aware that not everyone feels the same about everything. In no way am I angered or alarmed at these responses, and I hope others are not angered or alarmed by me.
Originally posted by BradKellBrrexkl
Truth be told, I believe in a Creator. I see no reason to attempt to Scientifically prove their is one, though I could see Science with a reason to Disprove one. After all, all Religion is a thing of FAITH. You must believe in that which you can not see or prove. By human nature that is a difficult concept, which is what makes Faith so valuable. If you could PROVE a Creator existed, there would be no need in Faith. You would simply believe it because you could see it. That takes no trusting, no power of will, no.... well, no LEAP.
If you BELIEVE in something even though you can't prove it, then you have Faith and TRULY BELIEVE. I see that being worthy of a Creator's attention.
Faith is the cornerstone of Religion. With Proof there is no need for Faith.
Originally posted by spamandham
...fallacy of consequence.
There is no reason to believe the consequences are real if the premise they are based on is unsubstantiated.
Originally posted by spamandham
If god is real, all powerful, and all knowing, and he wants me to believe/accept/do X, then he knows what he needs to do to accomplish that, and he has the power to do it. The 'free will' argument is a red herring.
Originally posted by spamandham
It doesn't address the fundamental problem that there is no reason to believe anything you are telling me regarding gods/afterlife/etc. in the first place.
Originally posted by spamandham
When I was a Christian, although I didn't like oppression, I satisfied myself knowing that the suffering of this world wasn't ultimately important since the prize was on the other side.
If I believe all injustice will be rectified, I have less motivation to see toward such rectification myself.
Originally posted by saint4God
You do believe you will die someday, yes? Is that not consequence enough?
Originally posted by saint4God
Also, if a doctor says you can either die or apply this ointment and you'll live, do you apply the ointment?
Originally posted by saint4God
It's about love. He loves us, therefore doesn't not make us slaves to DO everything He wants us to. If you are a parent, do you make your children do everything they're supposed to?
Originally posted by saint4God
Originally posted by spamandham
It doesn't address the fundamental problem that there is no reason to believe anything you are telling me regarding gods/afterlife/etc. in the first place.
The reason is that God and the afterlife may in fact exist (and I claim they do). If that possibly exists, would it not be worth exploring?
Originally posted by spamandham
We both agree we are going to die.
Originally posted by spamandham
You're still arguing from consequences. If I doubted the efficacy, and perhaps even suspected the ointment was harmfull, and expressed that to the doctor, and his only reply was "apply it or die", I would dismiss him as a quack and go see someone else.
Originally posted by spamandham
You misunderstand, I'm not talking about force. If god made his presence sufficiently clear, and further let me know he would punish me for failing to love him, I would do it. I'm not an idiot.
Originally posted by saint4God
No. It requires time and effort to explore it, and there are a 10000 other mystical claims competing with yours.
Originally posted by saint4God
Worse yet, the evidence you offer - faith and personal experience - is no evidence of gods or afterlife at all.
Originally posted by saint4God
If I tell you the boogey man is going to kill you if you don't believe in him, should you explore that possibility since the consequence is death, or would you instead summarily dismiss such a claim unless I supported it with more than just an argument from consequences?
Originally posted by saint4God
Alright, and my second question, is that not consequence enough?
Originally posted by saint4God
I understand. It sounds like you're unwilling to trust in anyone but yourself and your knowledge. Is that a good assessment?
Originally posted by saint4God
What if God wants you to come to Him?
Originally posted by saint4God
I'd say get crackin', we don't have 10,000 years to find out what's valid and what's not. Or are you accept defeat by being overwhelmed? I'm not sure I understand the lack of motivation.
Originally posted by saint4God
I'm offering to help you get the evidence you need.
Originally posted by saint4God
"Boogey man" didn't show up to the party.
Originally posted by Fromabove
I just have to say that there is a news report that the ACLU lost a case in court on a "Ten Comandments" display. I will sleep well tonight. The Judge told the lawyers for the ACLU that the nation was getting tired of unreasonable people continuously trying to rid the nation of Christian expression. There is still hope for all of us to free in America.
Fromabove
Originally written in the CONSTITUTION
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.
Originally posted by orangetom1999
Spamandham you posted:
"I do not believe you have more insight into these things than I. Nor do I have any reason to suspect ancient men did either. "
This is a very astonishing statement to me. If this is so..we are wasting tiime studying history. We need to be rewriting history since ancient men were not more insightful than us or you.
Originally posted by Fromabove
Even science takes faith. It takes faith to believe in atoms and then to search to prove them. All things take a degree of faith. It's just a matter as to how you apply that faith.
Fromabove