It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by spamandham
The year of jubilee applied only to male Hebrew slaves. It did not apply to females or to non-Hebrew male slaves.
54 " 'Even if he is not redeemed in any of these ways, he and his children are to be released in the Year of Jubilee, 55 for the Israelites belong to me as servants. They are my servants, whom I brought out of Egypt. I am the LORD your God.
You are merely arguing that their version of slavery was not as evil as ours. Does god permit evil of lesser degrees?
Originally posted by junglejake
Christ's coming changed a lot. He came, and died as the ultimate sacrifice. This passage from Matthew is interesting, because He says none of the Law will change...until everything is finished. In John 19:30, when Christ dies, he says,
30When he had received the drink, Jesus said, "It is finished." With that, he bowed his head and gave up his spirit.
Originally posted by chebob
George Bush wouldn't be the first person to use God as an excuse for violence I know, but one mans insanity doesn't define a religion.
Originally posted by chebob
Atheists go out and murder people day after day after day. Does this mean not believeing in God is equally dangerous and harmful? No, we are all responsible for our actions, and believeing in God is certainly not harmful to you or me.
Originally posted by chebob
Bush may be harmful, but christianity isn't.
Originally posted by chebob
To hate someone for believeing, is incredulous.
Originally posted by chebob
Both religion and atheism have their share of madmen,
Originally posted by junglejake
54 " 'Even if he is not redeemed in any of these ways, he and his children are to be released in the Year of Jubilee, 55 for the Israelites belong to me as servants. They are my servants, whom I brought out of Egypt. I am the LORD your God.
The passage uses the male pronoun, true, but also says, "the Israelites belong to me as servants." Women, too, are Israelites.
Originally posted by junglejake
You are arguing from the moral standpoint that all slavery is wrong. While I would agree that slavery is wrong, it was an acceptable practice for the Jews.
Originally posted by junglejake
When Christ came to this earth, he didn't lead a slave revolt or rebellion, because He knew that if people followed His laws, they would come to loath the practice of slavery.
Originally posted by spamandham
Yes, there are murderers, rapists, etc. of all faiths and nonfaiths, but it's much more difficult to justify massive atrocity without an appeal to deities. Whether a belief in god is harmful or not depends entirely on the nature of that belief.
The "don't take my word for it, but I won't do the research, you do it," argument again?
Originally posted by spamandham
Women and children were chattel in those days. The pronoun "he" is used because it is referring to males. You don't need to take my word on that. With very little effort you can verify that for yourself.
Well...If He established the culture, is He really reaffirming what the culture affirmed, or the other way around?
All slavery is wrong, except as compensation for criminal activity IMHO. I really don't care what a bunch of ancient goat herders felt was acceptable. God's commands are meaningless if all he does is reaffirm what the culture affirms. Is he making the rules or not?
He could have simply said, "oh and by the way, slavery is wrong." But rather than doing something that simple, he instead adopted the language of slavery (master/servant/slave) throughout his preaching.
He clearly had no problem shaking up the status quo, so why did he not simply condemn slavery just as he condemned divorce, another common practice of the day acceptable by Jewish custom?
Originally posted by junglejake
The "don't take my word for it, but I won't do the research, you do it," argument again?
Originally posted by junglejake
Well...If He established the culture, is He really reaffirming what the culture affirmed, or the other way around?
Originally posted by junglejake
As I said, His message was far, far greater than supporting just one cause.
Originally posted by junglejake
And Hitler used a corruption of evolution to justify the mass murder of Jews, Gypsies, Russians, and many others.
Originally posted by chebob
I believe it depends more on the nature of the person.
Originally posted by chebob
That's a shame, because it stains the whole image, but if anyone of any group, religious or otherwise, does something undesirable, you cannot lay the blame on the group, only the person.
Originally posted by chebob
Just don't think (as I've said somewhere else on this almost evangelestic religious posting spree) that were all the same, because it's like being racist.
Originally posted by spamandham
Beliefs are part of that nature. Our actions almost always reflect our beliefs.
Originally posted by saint4God
Does that mean someone who claims to be Christian that consistently acts differently than the very scripture that defines who they are, is not truly Christian?
Originally posted by junglejake
Only reason I brought Hitler up was because he corrupted the idea of evolution to serve his own genocidal needs. He was a Christian? I'd love to see some evidence on that, all my studying of Europe from about 1925 to 1945 has indicated otherwise...
Originally posted by saint4God
Originally posted by spamandham
From my perspective, anyone who calls themself a Christian is one.
In that case, I call myself "independantly wealthy!" *checks wallet...*
Hey, why didn't that work?
[edit on 14-10-2005 by saint4God]
Originally posted by saint4God
Originally posted by spamandham
From my perspective, anyone who calls themself a Christian is one.
In that case, I call myself "independantly wealthy!" *checks wallet...*
Hey, why didn't that work?
[edit on 14-10-2005 by saint4God]
Originally posted by spamandham
From my perspective, there is no independent authority on what makes someone a Christian regardless of what the Bible...
Originally posted by spamandham
Unfortunately Saint, the wallet trick won't work. It isn't enough to simply declare that your wallet is full. "You have to have faith."™
Originally posted by junglejake
Only reason I brought Hitler up was because he corrupted the idea of evolution to serve his own genocidal needs. He was a Christian? I'd love to see some evidence on that, all my studying of Europe from about 1925 to 1945 has indicated otherwise...