It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by passengername
I believe the 144,000 is talking about the reps of the 12 tribes of isreal that go in the rapture.
Originally posted by passengername
as far as the all men who didn't know women, this is purely a thing brought on by paul who was "undesirable" to say the least.
Originally posted by passengername
He attempted to become a pharisee to try to get a jewish woman to marry him.
Originally posted by passengername
well, I guess I'll tackle it. no one says you can't!
Originally posted by passengername
the whole idea is to keep church and state seperate.
Originally posted by passengername
no one says that you as a private citizen can't rant and rave all you want to about all us sinners going to hell.
Originally posted by passengername
we just don't want OUR funds(your's included i'm afraid) to pay for it.
Originally posted by spamandham
Your case is somewhat unique in that you believe you received direct communication from god. Most of us have not, nor do we have any reason to believe your experience was what you think it was.
Originally posted by spamandham
For the rest of us, how do we choose which printed warnings to consider? We have the Bible, the Qu'ran, the Indian Vedas, the Book of Mormon, Egyptian writings, etc.
Originally posted by spamandham
You've rejected the straightforward natural explanations for your experience out of hand. You have motivation to accept it, but not a reason.
Originally posted by spamandham
Originally posted by saint4God
God is still here, it can be checked.
Uh huh.
Originally posted by spamandham
You didn't explain why even though god wants everyone saved (1 Tim. 2:3-6),
Originally posted by spamandham
and everyone has been given to Jesus to save as he sees fit (John 3:35),
Originally posted by spamandham
and he gave himself as a ransom for all men (1 Tim, again), that these do not equate to universal salvation.
Originally posted by spamandham
All you did was play dictionary games and say that just because he wants it doesn't make it his will, and to further insert into the text your interpretation that 'ransom for all' really mean 'ransom for some'. The straightforward read of these passages supports universalism.
Originally posted by spamandham
Of course, your perspective is supported by other passages. Hence the numerous Christian sects.
Originally posted by spamandham
It can be it isn't intended to literally be 144,000, but rather represents a large perfection of perfections (12=perfect number). This is where a literal reading causes problems, but a symbolic reading doesn't.
Originally posted by spamandham
In Rev. 7 it states those in the white robes are the ones who came out of great tribulation (not "the" great tribulation BTW). Rev.6 speaks of those with the white robes as the ones who had been slain for the word of god, and Rev 14. refers to the 144,000 as those who were the 'firstfruits' - a reference back to sacrifice of the Old Testament, which gives context that they are those that were martyred, and are the same group thus spoken of in Rev. 6 and 7.
Originally posted by saint4God
This place isn't exactly a magnet for people who are trying to serve God.
Originally posted by saint4God
I've read 3 of the 5 (and parts of the other 2 I suspect), but know this is a trip we all have to take. Again, the statement above assumes is there's no God to check with. If a person can ask God, one can get answers.
Originally posted by saint4God
I've tested the 'straightforward natural explanations' and found them to be neither straightforward nor natural. I had tried to talk myself out of God to get what I wanted.
Originally posted by saint4God
I cannot reach through the screen and show you my life on a projector, as much as I'd like to.
Originally posted by saint4God
Therefore if we are attached to our sin, when that sin gets thrown, so do we. Like the ball in a ball-and-chain being thrown.
Originally posted by saint4God
The difference is what God wants and what He did. What He wants is everyone to be saved.
Originally posted by saint4God
What He did, was set up a mechanism by which we can choose to come to Him to gain eternal life. This is why Christ bothered speaking.
Originally posted by saint4God
If all he had to do was die and everyone would be saved, the 4 gospels would be a 1/2 page each.
Originally posted by saint4God
What benefit to me is it for me to say that Jesus didn't save everybody?
Originally posted by saint4God
There's more to it than that i think, but to toss everything in the air and say "it's all symbolic" means there is no truth, which is not what it says.
Originally posted by saint4God
To put it on the shelf next to Humpty Dumpty provides no value.
Originally posted by saint4God
I don't know how it can be seen these two separate groups as being mashed into one.
Originally posted by saint4God
I also feel sorry for anyone who believes only male virgins will have eternal life.
Originally posted by spamandham
I don't know about that. ATS seems to have a much higher fraction of fundamentalist types than most secular internet forums. But, this is just an ad hoc observation.
Originally posted by spamandham
The ranks of Muslims, Buhddists, alienists, etc. are filled with people who have had experiences like yours.
Originally posted by spamandham
How are the vast majority of the rest of us who have not had such an experience to judge?
Originally posted by spamandham
Realize that the greater fraction of the world has asked god for guidance, myself included in my more credulous days.
Originally posted by spamandham
If you had night terrors or temporal lobe epilepsy,
Originally posted by spamandham
you would not be able to talk yourself out of it. Those experiences seems as real as day to those who have them. If you are the skeptic you claim to be, you would realize that these two possibilities can not be eliminated. Based on things you've said in the past, I suspect night terrors as opposed to temporal lobe epilepsy. Were you awakened from sleep for these experiences?
Originally posted by spamandham
Even if you could, I wouldn't be convinced. See above.
Originally posted by spamandham
Since those who are saved still sin, they are just as "attached to sin" as the rest of us. Prisons have a higher percentage of faithful than the general population, so you might even argue the faithful are more attached to sin than the rest of us.
Originally posted by spamandham
An omnipotent being that sets things up different from what he wants? Sorry, there's no way to make sense of that. Your just repeating the party line at this point.
Originally posted by spamandham
Surely you understand that when the basic facts can not even be established, no meaningful choice can be made.
Originally posted by spamandham
Belief is not a matter of choice, and if you don't believe, all other "choices" are meaningless.
Originally posted by spamandham
I can not force myself to believe in your blatantly obvious mythology any more than I can force myself to believe in ghosts and aliens, Zeus or Valhalla. Until you can demonstrate that beliefs are the result of decisions rather than observations, your argument holds no water.
Originally posted by spamandham
I could say the same thing about your perspective. If faith in Jesus is all that matters, then the gospels could be a single paragraph.
Originally posted by spamandham
Although the gospels do talk about salvation, they concentrate heavily on messages about how to live a moral life as well.
Originally posted by spamandham
It resolves the concept of justice in your mind. People have a hard time accepting that life isn't fair. It's much easier to accept that it is all fair in some grander scheme. Would you be happy to learn that Hitler is in heaven in fellowship with those he brutally murdered?
Originally posted by spamandham
But even if you personally would be happy that everyone were saved, the church wouldn't be, and the church is the one spreading the delusion.
Originally posted by spamandham
Not necessarily. It means that you need to understand the symbolism to unlock the message. If you are taking 144,000 literally, you are in trouble not just because the number is so small, but also because Revelations listing of the 12 tribes conflicts with Genesis. The tribe of Dan has been replaced by the tribe of Manasses. No explanation for this is given anywhere in the Bible. But from a symbolic perspective, the tribes of Revelation refer to the 12 apostles and not the 12 actual tribes, where Judas (Dan) was replaced by Matthias (Manasses).
Originally posted by spamandham
I disagree. The mythological perspective of the Bible opens a whole new world in understanding ancient culture. It's invaluable from that perspective.
Originally posted by spamandham
I thought I just showed how.
Originally posted by spamandham
Few probably believe that, but that is what you must conclude from a nonsymbolic perspective on Revelation.
I don't see a Biblical conflict with that though, and in fact can cite a passage or two that would suggest the presence of extra-terrestrial life. Again, not related to God or eternity so I don't see any point of discussing that here.
Originally posted by madmanacrosswater
I don't see a Biblical conflict with that though, and in fact can cite a passage or two that would suggest the presence of extra-terrestrial life. Again, not related to God or eternity so I don't see any point of discussing that here.
Extra-terrestrial life not related to GOD? I need a little clarification of that statement.
Originally posted by passengername
yeah, bring it brother(or sister?). IF there are aliens, did God make them too? if he didn't, is there a creator that made other species? who is greater?
Originally posted by saint4God
Originally posted by spamandham
The ranks of Muslims, Buhddists, alienists, etc. are filled with people who have had experiences like yours.
I'd not heard them.
Originally posted by saint4God
By going and getting it.
Originally posted by saint4God
Did you get it for the time that you needed it?
Originally posted by saint4God
Originally posted by spamandham
If you had night terrors or temporal lobe epilepsy,
Anyhow, I wasn't part of a Christian organization at the time, so there goes that theory too.
Originally posted by saint4God
it seems you've read a good bit of scripture and therefore my answers are predictable unless tied to my experience, which you would also refuse even if they were seen.
Originally posted by saint4God
Originally posted by spamandham
Surely you understand that when the basic facts can not even be established, no meaningful choice can be made.
That's a personal inhibition.
Originally posted by saint4God
Originally posted by spamandham
Belief is not a matter of choice, and if you don't believe, all other "choices" are meaningless.
Sorry you feel that way. Sounds depressing.
Originally posted by saint4God
Originally posted by spamandham
Although the gospels do talk about salvation, they concentrate heavily on messages about how to live a moral life as well.
Why would that matter if we're all saved, hm?[/quopte]
Could it be because salvation is not what the original message was all about, but rather something tacked on later?
Originally posted by saint4God
Originally posted by spamandham
But even if you personally would be happy that everyone were saved, the church wouldn't be, and the church is the one spreading the delusion.
Actually I get my information from the Book.
Where did the Book come from?
The tribe of Dan has been replaced by the tribe of Manasses. No explanation for this is given anywhere in the Bible. But from a symbolic perspective, the tribes of Revelation refer to the 12 apostles and not the 12 actual tribes, where Judas (Dan) was replaced by Matthias (Manasses).
Originally posted by saint4God
We're going in circles again.
Originally posted by spamandham
I disagree. The mythological perspective of the Bible opens a whole new world in understanding ancient culture. It's invaluable from that perspective.
Originally posted by saint4God
Well, when you're ready to engage in a serious discussion, let me know.
Originally posted by saint4God
My bad, thought we went into a general discussion from there. I'll refer back to the "where there is life there is hope" statement, though I agree it's hard to see anyone suffer and would do all I could the help and alleviate.
Originally posted by saint4God
The word doesn't bother me, he could say "you female dog!" means the same thing and am typically not alone watching tv.....After some questioning on it, I realized this so try to respect their mental space and try to kick the habit all together.
Originally posted by spamandham
Ok then, to maintain your claim of being a skeptic, you need to research to see whether or not people of other beliefs have similar experiences that confirm those beliefs.
Originally posted by spamandham
That's not very helpful. Most of go to our graves without such confirmation.
Originally posted by Charlie Murphy
Oh I didnt mind discussing it, but maybe there was a miscommunication that I supported people who kill themselves.
Originally posted by saint4God
I can understand those two reasons, and I know if I watch a show with alot of swearing, over time I swear more.
Originally posted by saint4God
I think of it as a kind of way to relieve stress. Its better to let it out, than to let it build up inside.
Originally posted by saint4God
I could say "COOKIES" everytime I get mad, but it means the same to me.
Originally posted by saint4God
About your comment on the slim chance of finding alien life, I disagree. Alien life could be as simple as bacteria, its still life.
Originally posted by saint4God
In regards to alien life not being significant, I still don't see how you can feel that way. If you think all life was created by God, then of course so were they. Maybe they have more insight, or knowledge to share with us on that topic, among many.
Originally posted by saint4God
And thats ignoring the possibility they might be "God".
Originally posted by saint4God
Peace, love, empathy.
Originally posted by saint4God
Kurt Cobain
Originally posted by saint4God
I've known (face-to-face, not boards) Wiccans, Buddhists, Hindi, Athiests, Satanists, Druidic, Agnostics (I used to be one), and I'm sure some others that I can't recall at the moment. Only representatives from one group listed above have claimed to me that they have had direct communication back and forth with their master.
Originally posted by saint4God
I've had an EEG, CAT scan, EKG, bloodwork and various other tests. What test needs to be done to be considered sufficient?
Originally posted by saint4God
Surely it was my good health that caused these experiences, huh?
Originally posted by saint4God
Actually, it is one we have control over. I know people who have so much faith that they don't have to see to believe.
Originally posted by saint4God
You've mentioned that you were once faithful and are now faithless. That's a decision you've made that changed your beliefs.
Originally posted by saint4God
Originally posted by spamandham
Where did the Book come from?
Many, many authors who have had the God experience. What's most impressive is how well they all mesh together, despite the distances of years and locations.
Originally posted by junglejake
Stop forcing your beliefs on us
So I guess I agree, by Christians sharing the Gospel, they are, in fact, forcing their beliefs and God's will on you.
Originally posted by BaastetNoir
People get so cranky when someone talks about Christianity...what for ? whats the point? Noone seems to care if someone comes along and shares the "goddess" and the "rainbow" and the " moon rays"..or whatever else, but whne it comes to Christianity its "forcing"... heh ...go figure
Originally posted by spamandham
Originally posted by BaastetNoir
People get so cranky when someone talks about Christianity...what for ? whats the point? Noone seems to care if someone comes along and shares the "goddess" and the "rainbow" and the " moon rays"..or whatever else, but whne it comes to Christianity its "forcing"... heh ...go figure
Christians are the only ones in the west attempting to use the law to force children to pray every morning in school, to force the usage of public property/money to support blatently religious displays, to comingle church and state with "faith based" government programs, to dumb society down with silly creation myths taught as "theories" etc. In other words, Christians tend to be legally obnoxious and not just socially obnoxious.
I dont laugh at Wiccans, I laugh at the hypocricy of some of their members as to how Peacefull and no-judgemental they are, but than they turn around and gang up on Christians and call them dumb for believing in Christ when they themselves believe in agoddess...
We all laugh at the Wiccans behind their backs of course, but the Wiccans don't pose a theocratic threat.