It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Science indicates evolution of species.

page: 4
5
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 15 2020 @ 10:50 PM
link   

originally posted by: Raggedyman

You care to show some repeatable observable and testable evidence from the scientific community

Been waiting for a long time for that and everyone scatters when asked


In what way?

Read the books I listed and then we can talk more.




posted on Mar, 15 2020 @ 10:50 PM
link   
a reply to: Phage

Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?

A long time ago.

Preferred the movie if im honest, but i seen that first.
edit on 15-3-2020 by andy06shake because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 15 2020 @ 10:52 PM
link   
a reply to: andy06shake

Yes.

A very good movie. Very good. Didn't like the go-round though. The film noir voiceovers suck.



posted on Mar, 15 2020 @ 11:00 PM
link   

originally posted by: Phage

Have you read the book, BTW?


Its been a long time, I think I'll down load it and listen to it on my drives to work, always loved Philip K. Dick.



posted on Mar, 15 2020 @ 11:06 PM
link   
a reply to: Phage

Talking about classic science fiction.

I was always partial to Asimov's "The Last Question"

Suppose it's kind of relevant given that the beginning and end of the universe and creators have cropped up in the thread.

"Let there be light" eh?

Good old Multivac got there in the end or was it the end of the beginning, anyhow it was a great story also.



posted on Mar, 15 2020 @ 11:11 PM
link   
a reply to: andy06shake




Is 80% of the people on the planet not screaming out for his return in rather a few different ways?


Not really and certainly not in the way you chose to describe.




You will need to elaborate there, i did not ken we had a direct channel, short of a missing Ark of the Covenant, and that was a one-way affair was it not?


The very first chapter of Genesis requires minimal reading comprehension to
understand what Gods purpose for creating us was. That before sin God was
present on earth and seeking a relationship with his creation. Was the ideal
oracle and does not create anything to die.

There is no question you can ask, that is without an answer that makes perfect
sense according to who God is and what scripture says. I love it and can't
imagine the world without it. What I don't understand is the obvious hate
people have for it. I don't believe Allah is God but I don't hate the Quran.



posted on Mar, 15 2020 @ 11:13 PM
link   
a reply to: andy06shake




I was always partial to Asimov's "The Last Question"

The one about the names of God?
One by one the stars were going out.

"Let there be light" is a Heinlein tale about "free" energy.

edit on 3/15/2020 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 15 2020 @ 11:21 PM
link   
a reply to: carsforkids

It's not hate mate, in a way it's a sheer wonder really.

And i imagine your faith extends you enormous peace of mind.

There will always be questions, that breed more questions.

Such is the nature of the human condition, anthropomorphized invisible sky God or otherwise.

Love what you wana love, and don't let anybody tell you any different.

Hate was not my intention, just plain curiosity with a healthy mixture of levity.
edit on 15-3-2020 by andy06shake because: Bread. LoL



posted on Mar, 15 2020 @ 11:22 PM
link   

originally posted by: Peserc

originally posted by: Gothmog

originally posted by: Out6of9Balance
a reply to: Gothmog

Adaption to the surrounding.

Beings are living for thousands of years in a surrounding that changes them.

Something guides that "adaptation"
Most mutations are "bad" (defective) mutations and are caused by some outside force.


Oh, really? And thats god?

There is more than a few quantum physicists believe that it is either creation or a hologram.



posted on Mar, 15 2020 @ 11:23 PM
link   
a reply to: Gothmog

Does either one preclude evolution?



posted on Mar, 15 2020 @ 11:30 PM
link   
a reply to: andy06shake




Hate was not my intention, just plain curiosity with a healthy mixture of levity.


I didn't detect any hatefulness from you at all my good man.
I was speaking in general terms of the hate. Sorry I wasn't clear
about that. My bad.



posted on Mar, 15 2020 @ 11:45 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gothmog

originally posted by: Peserc

originally posted by: Gothmog

originally posted by: Out6of9Balance
a reply to: Gothmog

Adaption to the surrounding.

Beings are living for thousands of years in a surrounding that changes them.

Something guides that "adaptation"
Most mutations are "bad" (defective) mutations and are caused by some outside force.


Oh, really? And thats god?

There is more than a few quantum physicists believe that it is either creation or a hologram.


Belief has very little to do with reasonable doubt.



posted on Mar, 16 2020 @ 12:36 AM
link   
a reply to: Gothmog

Oh, really? So, the matter the matter in question is biology, evolution, but there are some physicists that made some studies about it, interesting. can you share some knowledge through some peer reviewed papers?



posted on Mar, 16 2020 @ 12:38 AM
link   
a reply to: TzarChasm

Belief has very much to do with reality.



posted on Mar, 16 2020 @ 03:04 AM
link   

originally posted by: Xtrozero

originally posted by: Raggedyman

You care to show some repeatable observable and testable evidence from the scientific community

Been waiting for a long time for that and everyone scatters when asked


In what way?

Read the books I listed and then we can talk more.


Didn’t ask for pictures or play school, asked for scientific evidence,
There is none in the books or I wouldn’t have asked

Do you really think there is evidence in the books, really
Do you really think lots of people question evolution based on faith not actual problems with the science

The books, that’s just pure and utter childish ignorance

Don’t wast my time with dumb, get scientific evidence
There are a million threads on ats, must be easy to find



posted on Mar, 16 2020 @ 03:11 AM
link   



posted on Mar, 16 2020 @ 04:17 AM
link   
a reply to: TzarChasm

It seems the creator did leave a signature on mans DNA the first decrypted portion of the message is God eternal within the body...
edit on 16-3-2020 by 5StarOracle because: Word



posted on Mar, 16 2020 @ 06:55 AM
link   

originally posted by: Gothmog
But what guides evolution ?



How does a river or stream know to always follow a path that is downhill?


edit on 2020/3/16 by Box of Rain because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 16 2020 @ 07:15 AM
link   

originally posted by: Raggedyman

originally posted by: Out6of9Balance
a reply to: Raggedyman

There's a whole belief system built upon this science. Can't you see people are acting like they evolved from Neanderthal?


I thought scientific evidence now pointed to Neanderthals being stronger and more intelligent than Homo sapiens
Do you know what you are talking about I am wondering


First of all, it is NOT believed that Neanderthals were more intelligent than Homo sapiens. Stronger, yes, but Homo sapiens are believed to have been more intelligent. Neanderthals are thought to be more intelligent than we once thought, but not necessarily more intelligent than Homo sapiens.

Having said that, evolution is not always the strongest survive. Nor is "more intelligent" necessarily a goal of evolution.

Species evolve to better suit a particular environment. Those environments often undergo changes, and species must change along with that environment, or be resilient enough to slip into a different environment, to survive.

That change does not always mean becoming physically stronger or more intelligent. Intelligence can help an organism find ways to meet the challenges of a changing environment, but intelligence is not the only way. Mobility is another way; i.e., as a species' environment changes, that species as the ability to move until it finds an environment more like it's old one (the one they are best suited for). The former members of that species that stayed behind were able to do so because they evolved adaptations to the changed environment.

Again that evolutionary adaptation does not need to be "stronger" or "more intelligence." It could be coloring, or the ability to climb or borrow or to wade into shallow waters, or the ability to eat a food that they didn't eat before.


edit on 2020/3/16 by Box of Rain because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 16 2020 @ 07:31 AM
link   
a reply to: Box of Rain

What a croc of crap
We are talking larger brains in human Neanderthal not in frogs or fish
Neanderthal were superior by all accounts, physically more dominant and larger brain, stronger and smarter

Ridiculous comments, you are suggesting a smaller less physical human is stronger and smarter and can travel more than a stronger smarter human Neanderthal , that’s dumb, simply dumb.

We didn’t evolve from neanderthal, maybe we are slowly breaking down from a superior neanderthal to a dumber more sickly homo sapien sapien

Assumptions are dumb, you have at best a guess

Welcome to entropy, humanity is in its failing, flailing state. Neanderthal was the superior, we the inferior, you just can’t handle the fact you could be wrong

Just like a river travelling down hill.
edit on 16-3-2020 by Raggedyman because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
5
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join