It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Dumbass
originally posted by: MerkabaMeditation
originally posted by: Dumbass
originally posted by: MerkabaMeditation
originally posted by: ignorant_ape
a reply to: MerkabaMeditation
there are 2 types of people
those who comprehend statistics
you
................................................
I have a univ. degree in maths, statistics compromising a large part of my courses, so I would say I have a pretty good understanding of it.
-MM
As you say you have a uni degree you are able to understand what exactly is measured right?
The world is not capable of measuring all suspected cases. So in the severely effected countries you get tested when you are at risk, not when you have symptoms but seem to manage. Then you're ordered to stay home, infected but not measured and not in the stats.
It's the same in Norway, you're only tested if you are at risk, only people that have travelled to abroad in an infected region and show Coronavirus symptoms are tested - or those that have been in direct contact with someone that has been infected in Norway. Source: Learn to use Google Search engine.
-MM
Taking one statistical number and extrapolate it onto a local region and scream wrong implies you take the statistical number as static while we are still exploring this as it is too new and too fresh hence the numbers (percentages to be clear for you) keep changing. It's gonna take a while before we know the true numbers.
Good luck though and welcome to my Legion.
originally posted by: MerkabaMeditation
originally posted by: pavil
a reply to: MerkabaMeditation
Learn to use Google Search engine.
So Google is the Ultimate source of all data? That might be part of the issue.
Google would never censor anything.....
Are you claiming that my numbers of 100,000 people infected and 3,400 people dead are lies, here is a link that proves that YOU ARE a lier.
news.sky.com...
-MM
China's central province of Hubei, excluding the provincial capital Wuhan (the epicentre of the outbreak), has reported no new cases of coronavirus over 24 hours for the first time.
There were 126 new cases in Wuhan.
originally posted by: ignorant_ape
POST REMOVED BY STAFF
originally posted by: pavil
a reply to: MerkabaMeditation
Do you think the actual number of infected is more than 100k?
If so, how much more?
Remember China's population and population density.
All your other percents depend on this one variable.
originally posted by: ignorant_ape
POST REMOVED BY STAFF?
originally posted by: MerkabaMeditation
originally posted by: pavil
a reply to: MerkabaMeditation
Do you think the actual number of infected is more than 100k?
If so, how much more?
Remember China's population and population density.
All your other percents depend on this one variable.
Hard to know, there have been some reseach on this that seems find that the number of infected people are a lot higher due to the speed of spread.
-MM
originally posted by: pavil
originally posted by: MerkabaMeditation
originally posted by: pavil
a reply to: MerkabaMeditation
Do you think the actual number of infected is more than 100k?
If so, how much more?
Remember China's population and population density.
All your other percents depend on this one variable.
Hard to know, there have been some reseach on this that seems find that the number of infected people are a lot higher due to the speed of spread.
-MM
Exactly....
...
It's a serious virus, but not as deadly as 3%.
It sounds like Iran isn't reporting actual numbers of deaths either so it works both ways. I'm positive some deaths by CV haven't been reported as such.
originally posted by: MerkabaMeditation
originally posted by: pavil
originally posted by: MerkabaMeditation
originally posted by: pavil
a reply to: MerkabaMeditation
Do you think the actual number of infected is more than 100k?
If so, how much more?
Remember China's population and population density.
All your other percents depend on this one variable.
Hard to know, there have been some reseach on this that seems find that the number of infected people are a lot higher due to the speed of spread.
-MM
Exactly....
...
It's a serious virus, but not as deadly as 3%.
It sounds like Iran isn't reporting actual numbers of deaths either so it works both ways. I'm positive some deaths by CV haven't been reported as such.
Iran is also at nearly 3% mortality rate; they have 4,747 infected and 124 are dead from Coronavirus, equals 2.6% mortality rate. The same mortality rate percentage pops up all over the world, locally and worldwide - with the exception of some countries, like Norway, which have 0% serioulsy sick and 0% mortality rate.
-MM