So $100,000 - $500,000,000 : MSM Math

a reply to: IAMTAT
they make the best girl scout cookies!

a reply to: DBCowboy

There is an idea. Run a campaign using cat videos for commercials.

a reply to: Ahabstar

I've heard worse ideas.

😺

Hilarious!

mobile.twitter.com...

originally posted by: FauxMulder
a reply to: DBCowboy

It's less than 1 percent of his net worth.

He should redistribute all that wealth.....to my bank account.

Makes you wonder why, being so magnanimous, they don't just cut the middleman (government) out and help people directly.


We know why.

Bloomberg humiliated himself.
Maybe he will now realise just what an achievement it was for Trump to win the Presidency and beat 16 Republican candidates before that.

Russian janitors are smarter than Democratic congressmen. My cat may even be smarter than some of the Democrat candidates. Notice I never said that My cat was smarter than Democratic voters, but it is less brainwashed than they are..

a reply to: SocratesJohnson

I think young voters (40ish and under) see very few television commercials. Who is watching brodcast T.V.? Facebook ads, on the other hand, you can't easily avoid unless you shun Facebook entirely which few young people do.

Bloomberg was misguided in his spending on television commercials. They don't have the power they used to. He should have put his money into 15 second ads for youtube, facebook, and various apps.

Russians spent (are spending?) smart. Bloomberg was stupid.

originally posted by: SocratesJohnson
So the Russian spend $100,000 on Facebook ads and it worked so well on Democrat’s and Independents That it got Trump elected.

Mike Bloomberg spent 500 million and cannot get one delegate, so far in the 50 states.

So are the Russians that much smarter than Bloomberg and his team?
Or
Is Russian collusion just a hoax and Trump was the better candidate to more states.

I love such simple facts like this. It truly exposes how so full of shlt the left is.

Thank you for making this post.

I saw quite a few Bloomberg youtube ads, and didn’t even have a facebook account. 100k on Facebook ads isn’t worth 500 million of cross platform media blitz. He spent twice that on Facebook easily.

I just did the google search, coming up as 8 million in the past week alone spent by Bloomberg on Facebook ads and 68 million in total in the past 2 years. Lol a reply to: Gnawledge

a reply to: SocratesJohnson

About $5 million a day for three months, how much of that paid for office's and equipment? Has it been returned, or did they just changing the sighn? Would like to see it looked into.

originally posted by: ManFromEurope

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: SocratesJohnson

Just imagine how many people would have benefitted from businesses and programs seeded with 500 million.

The 500 million did not vanish. Thats normal marketing, money pays for marketing, marketing pays for other things, money keeps circulating.

Where have I heard that before?
Oh yeah my 6th grade economics class...

Care to comment on the OP?
Or are you just gonna cartwheel around it?
Nice leotard btw...

a reply to: SocratesJohnson

Dude thats what I've been bringing up way before Bloomberg was ever a thing...

Freaking $100,000 is dirt money compared to the vast scale of actual grassroot movements within the USA. NOT EVEN INCLUDING PACs and actual campaign money... $100,000 tipped the scales?

I'll say it and say it again - it's always been about devaluing the ACTUAL voters who voted for Trump. So many people wanted him and some stupid fringy ad did not sway them one way or the other. It cracks me up time and time again.

I think I started a thread asking people to list the physical ways Russia could interfere in an election.

And when you list fake face book ads or other internet stuff it sounds retarded...

That is why when ever you hear Russian interference, it stops there...they never list actual physical ways Russia could interfere...

Literally the main culprit are fake news ads on the internet and its effects so little.

And there is a great video of Obama going on and on about how secure the u.s. election system is.

Says its unprecedented that voting interference is even bought up before votes are even counted.

Its was 1 of Obama's best speeches

I doubt any Russian agitprop/disinformation specialist came up with anything that wasn’t already stated by Americans on Facebook or any other social media, not to mention op eds, articles, news stories and comment sections on websites. It’s absurd to think the Russians had any kind of impact on the election. But the dems have to believe Trump “colluded” with Russia. Any other explanation is too painful to contemplate.

This reminds me of ol Bern on reddit. Every other ad is him asking for money. Genius ol bastard crowd sources his retirement!

What a bunch of morons.

Bush2 - nice guy, likable - not a good president.

Obama - nice enough guy, articulate - not a good president.

Trump - total jack@ss at times BUT - strong president.

There are multiple gauges of satisfaction in the US that are at or near all time high levels. The economy is the best it’s been in 20 years. We have managed to not start a new armed conflict at scale for 4 years. Better trade deals have been reached, we’re asking other countries to do their part and the world knows America isn’t afraid of them. That’s all pretty good stuff.

I have to laugh that we’re still talking about Russia. Read the points above and ask yourself if that’s what Russia wanted? How do you spin that to say Russia wins from us get stronger and more prosperous. They don’t. They have every incentive to see someone like Bernie win so they can steam roll him - Little incentive to want someone like our current POTUS.

originally posted by: SocratesJohnson
So the Russian spend $100,000 on Facebook ads and it worked so well on Democrat’s and Independents That it got Trump elected.

Mike Bloomberg spent 500 million and cannot get one delegate, so far in the 50 states.

So are the Russians that much smarter than Bloomberg and his team?
Or
Is Russian collusion just a hoax and Trump was the better candidate to more states.

Trump isn't Hillary is the simple reason he won. Good thing this time around that Biden is not Trump.