It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by undo
Rockpuck,
Interesting comments.
Question to a Mason: So what exactly is the criteria to become a mason?
Answer from Mason: You must believe in a god, a supernatural being, is the first requirement.
The real test of this particular damage control statement is in the way its employed. How does one believe and not believe at the same time? I think I know the answer to this but want to hear you say it.
I direct you to re-read your comment. "Religion" is the problem. Of course, "Religion" is the definition of believing in a god or supernatural being, the first rule of Apophis (sorry, wrong TV show).. I mean, the first rule of masonry.
Your comment regarding "feelings hurt" was really eye-opening. Thank you for the confirmation of my theory. What-a-pal.
Originally posted by Rockpuck
Right.. I am affraid I fail to see your point..
As for ancients.. there is a line between inteligence and understanding.. inteligence leads to understanding, it is not understanding its self.. inteligence is also the capacity to understand.. people 5,000 years ago where just as inteligent as they are today, we simply understand more.. and im sure they knew things we dont.. I dont know how to farm, I would be ignorant in their eyes.
Originally posted by undo
No because it has been so engrained into the educational institutions that almost everyone accepts it as gospel. So many who dont have a single prejudice bone in their bodies, still are believing what appears to be racist science theories.
Originally posted by undo
that's not what i said, now was it?
i said even people who aren't prejudice believe it now.
even people of different races believe it.
even races that are basically considered lesser lifeforms by darwin's theories and the theories of his colleagues, believe it.
they don't realize the implications.
many of the pharaohs appear to be hybrids, much more advanced than homo sapiens.
hey, i'm caucasian but i can see no reason to assume black people are the intellectual equivalent of 11 year olds and not even part of the human species
Originally posted by junglejake
However, I am curious, shaunybaby, as to your logical reasoning for dismissing such assumptions that one race could be superior to another based on the theory of evolution.
Originally posted by shaunybaby
Originally posted by junglejake
However, I am curious, shaunybaby, as to your logical reasoning for dismissing such assumptions that one race could be superior to another based on the theory of evolution.
logically came to that reasoning because we all share the same ancestor, people in australia, china, africa, and uk may 'look' different, and therefore evolved in slightly different ways, adapting to their surroundings, but it doesn't mean one race is higher or lower than another. infact the masai tribes of africa have a verg tall average height, it's way above 6'4''.. and that's average. i hardly think that shows a 'lower' evolved species.
Originally posted by junglejake
Actually, evolution was used as the foundation for eugenics and the Nazi movement as well as several white supremacist movements through the last 150 years. Evolution on its own is not inherently racist, but the potential is most assuredly there.
However, I am curious, shaunybaby, as to your logical reasoning for dismissing such assumptions that one race could be superior to another based on the theory of evolution.
Originally posted by shaunybaby
Surely most murders leave a trail or clue?
Whether that clue/trail is an obvious satanic symbol or a hidden piece of forensic evidence, there's often a trail.
Originally posted by shaunybaby
Just because satanic symbols were left at the scene of the crime, this doesn't make it a hate crime. It's not certain that the killer/s knew his/her/their victims, and it's not certain that he/she/they knew their victims were christian.