It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: proximo
originally posted by: carewemust
originally posted by: proximo
originally posted by: xuenchen
😃 😆 😃
My Meeting with Julian Assange
There is a lot of misinformation floating out there regarding my meeting with Julian Assange so let me provide some clarity on the matter:
At no time did I talk to President Trump about Julian Assange. Likewise, I was not directed by Trump or anyone else connected with him to meet with Julian Assange. I was on my own fact finding mission at personal expense to find out information I thought was important to our country. I was shocked to find out that no other member of Congress had taken the time in their official or unofficial capacity to interview Julian Assange. At no time did I offer Julian Assange anything from the President because I had not spoken with the President about this issue at all. However, when speaking with Julian Assange, I told him that if he could provide me information and evidence about who actually gave him the DNC emails, I would then call on President Trump to pardon him. At no time did I offer a deal made by the President, nor did I say I was representing the President. Upon my return, I spoke briefly with Gen. Kelly. I told him that Julian Assange would provide information about the purloined DNC emails in exchange for a pardon. No one followed up with me including Gen. Kelly and that was the last discussion I had on this subject with anyone representing Trump or in his Administration.
Even though I wasn't successful in getting this message through to the President I still call on him to pardon Julian Assange, who is the true whistleblower of our time. Finally, we are all holding our breath waiting for an honest investigation into the murder of Seth Rich.
That last line tells you he knows the truth - and was told by Assange Seth Rich was the source.
From bits and pieces of incoming info, it appears that there may not be any "honest investigators" in the DOJ. At least not any to investigate high-level crimes involving Democrats.
It sure does seem that way. We won't know for sure till we see what Durham comes up with.
originally posted by: carewemust
originally posted by: xuenchen
If the DNC was truly on the up and up at the time, they would have gladly given the server system(s) to the FBI when the FBI requested 😎
Let me get this straight. The DNC called the FBI. When the FBI got there, DNC head Debbie Wazzerman-Schultz told them to go away. Right?
Seriously, how would Assange be in a position to actually know for a fact, one way or the other?
originally posted by: ChaoticOrder
a reply to: xuenchen
I was on my own fact finding mission at personal expense to find out information I thought was important to our country.
Nice find! So it's exactly what I suspected, he was acting on his own accord... isn't it funny how the MSM neglects to mention these pertinent facts in order to gently mold the story into something it's not. I've seen it so many times that a single phrase, "under Mr Rohrabacher's terms", is enough to tell me the offer didn't come from Trump.
originally posted by: xuenchen
If the DNC was truly on the up and up at the time, they would have gladly given the server system(s) to the FBI when the FBI requested 😎
originally posted by: Subaeruginosa
a reply to: Lumenari
They had already pumped tens of millions of dollars into the Clinton Foundation, paid Bill extravagant speaking fees, had a good time doing Uranium 1.
lol, that just sounds like a bunch of right wing conspiracy theory gibberish to me... From everything I've seen, she always held a pretty strict stance towards the Russian government well she was Secretary of State.
originally posted by: Krakatoa
originally posted by: alldaylong
Interesting story just breaking.
A lawyer for Julian Assange has alleged that President Donald Trump offered to pardon the Wikileaks founder, if he said Russia was not involved in leaking emails during the 2016 US election.
The offer is said to have been conveyed by the former Republican Congressman, Dana Rohrabacher.
Assange's barrister revealed the claim at Westminster Magistrates' Court ahead of an extradition hearing next wee
The White House have of course denied the claim is true.
Let's see what becomes of this.
www.bbc.co.uk...
Was anyone under a sworn oath when that statement was made?
Do they have actual evidence, beyond hearsay, that the statement is true?
I have had it with attacks based upon hearsay....I want actual evidence, that you can use in a court of law.
Until then, it's all just noise.
originally posted by: alldaylong
Interesting story just breaking.
A lawyer for Julian Assange has alleged that President Donald Trump offered to pardon the Wikileaks founder, if he said Russia was not involved in leaking emails during the 2016 US election.
The offer is said to have been conveyed by the former Republican Congressman, Dana Rohrabacher.
Assange's barrister revealed the claim at Westminster Magistrates' Court ahead of an extradition hearing next wee
The White House have of course denied the claim is true.
Let's see what becomes of this.
www.bbc.co.uk...
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: Krakatoa
originally posted by: alldaylong
Interesting story just breaking.
A lawyer for Julian Assange has alleged that President Donald Trump offered to pardon the Wikileaks founder, if he said Russia was not involved in leaking emails during the 2016 US election.
The offer is said to have been conveyed by the former Republican Congressman, Dana Rohrabacher.
Assange's barrister revealed the claim at Westminster Magistrates' Court ahead of an extradition hearing next wee
The White House have of course denied the claim is true.
Let's see what becomes of this.
www.bbc.co.uk...
Was anyone under a sworn oath when that statement was made?
Do they have actual evidence, beyond hearsay, that the statement is true?
I have had it with attacks based upon hearsay....I want actual evidence, that you can use in a court of law.
Until then, it's all just noise.
My but Trump has so many apologists!
Always with the excuses.
originally posted by: InTheLight
originally posted by: alldaylong
Interesting story just breaking.
A lawyer for Julian Assange has alleged that President Donald Trump offered to pardon the Wikileaks founder, if he said Russia was not involved in leaking emails during the 2016 US election.
The offer is said to have been conveyed by the former Republican Congressman, Dana Rohrabacher.
Assange's barrister revealed the claim at Westminster Magistrates' Court ahead of an extradition hearing next wee
The White House have of course denied the claim is true.
Let's see what becomes of this.
www.bbc.co.uk...
But will he put on a condom?
originally posted by: JON666
a reply to: proximo
From what I understand the server has never been turned over to law enforcement, to investigate if it was hacked. So it just propaganda of the Russian hack rather than someone on the inside.
Someone is lying and will eventually be charged with perjury.
originally posted by: JON666
a reply to: alldaylong
Wasn't it Seth Rich who leaked them was he a Russian asset?
originally posted by: proximo
originally posted by: JON666
a reply to: proximo
From what I understand the server has never been turned over to law enforcement, to investigate if it was hacked. So it just propaganda of the Russian hack rather than someone on the inside.
Yes, that is correct.
It infuriates me - the Dossier which has been totally discredited as total lies paid for by the DNC is what started all things Russia.
The same DNC paid crowdstrike to examine the server - why is it so hard to believe that the DNC would also pay them to lie that Russia was involved in the taking of the emails. It has already proven they have done it before.
Again read this article which clearly states - it could not have been hacked remotely because internet speeds are not fast enough to account for the file transfer speed.
originally posted by: RazorV66
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: Krakatoa
originally posted by: alldaylong
Interesting story just breaking.
A lawyer for Julian Assange has alleged that President Donald Trump offered to pardon the Wikileaks founder, if he said Russia was not involved in leaking emails during the 2016 US election.
The offer is said to have been conveyed by the former Republican Congressman, Dana Rohrabacher.
Assange's barrister revealed the claim at Westminster Magistrates' Court ahead of an extradition hearing next wee
The White House have of course denied the claim is true.
Let's see what becomes of this.
www.bbc.co.uk...
Was anyone under a sworn oath when that statement was made?
Do they have actual evidence, beyond hearsay, that the statement is true?
I have had it with attacks based upon hearsay....I want actual evidence, that you can use in a court of law.
Until then, it's all just noise.
My but Trump has so many apologists!
Always with the excuses.
Coming from an extremely large Leftist deflector such as yourself, those words really don’t hold any water.