It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

image assistance

page: 1
4
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 15 2020 @ 07:12 PM
link   
I need some assistance from you guys.

I got a case today with a picture included.
This person says they were driving south bound on the hiway at N 45.0125 W 63.4770 in Nova Scotia, Canada.
They say they spotted a dumbbell shaped craft over the forest.

I'm on my IPad and very limited with what I can do, or I would do this myself...

But I was hoping someone could take this picture and superimpose it on a screenshot from google earth street view for me.
(I know The chances of it fitting properly are low. But it's worth a shot.)
Don't go out of your way to do it. Like I said, I can take care of it tomorrow once I'm back in my office.
But if your bored, and know how to do it, I'll greatly appreciate it.

I want to try to rule out pareidolia from the tree branches.

The object in question is to the left of the bare birch tree, along the tree line.





posted on Feb, 15 2020 @ 09:03 PM
link   
a reply to: Macenroe82

Well, I took a break from watching "Ripper Street" on Netflix and saw your thread. It's almost impossible to get the exact orientation to the picture that you posted, but I came close. It seems that the circled images are identical, so I think the coordinates are correct. IMO, the "dumbbell shaped craft" looks to be a case of pareidolia.


edit on 2/15/2020 by shawmanfromny because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 16 2020 @ 05:25 AM
link   
a reply to: shawmanfromny

Awesome!

Thank you very much.
And just what I thought - pareidolia



posted on Feb, 19 2020 @ 11:32 AM
link   

originally posted by: shawmanfromny
a reply to: Macenroe82

Well, I took a break from watching "Ripper Street" on Netflix and saw your thread. It's almost impossible to get the exact orientation to the picture that you posted, but I came close. It seems that the circled images are identical, so I think the coordinates are correct. IMO, the "dumbbell shaped craft" looks to be a case of pareidolia.


Doesn't look that way to me, with your side-by-side comparison. There is clearly nothing behind the trees in the first picture and in the second, there looks to be a structure behind the trees. It appears to have a central shaft with a sphere on either end, which seem metallic as there is a reflective quality. Obviously, the two pics are taken during different seasons which doesn't help.



So, in my opinion, there is something there and at first, I thought it was some kind of tower.



posted on Feb, 19 2020 @ 06:59 PM
link   
a reply to: fromtheskydown

Interesting observations, but it seems the 'UFO pic' was taken from a moving vehicle, adding a degree of motion-blur into the frame - which obviously doesn't help matters and arguably further underlines the pareidolia hypothesis.

Then again, if we hear the full story of WHY the pic was taken in the first place, it could help matters since this isn't a case of the photographer noticing something in a pic after the event, rather it was taken in reaction TO 'something'.

So I don't think this can be binned just yet. Are you expecting further info, Mac?



edit on 19-2-2020 by ConfusedBrit because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 20 2020 @ 04:44 AM
link   

originally posted by: ConfusedBrit
a reply to: fromtheskydown

Interesting observations, but it seems the 'UFO pic' was taken from a moving vehicle, adding a degree of motion-blur into the frame - which obviously doesn't help matters and arguably further underlines the pareidolia hypothesis.

Then again, if we hear the full story of WHY the pic was taken in the first place, it could help matters since this isn't a case of the photographer noticing something in a pic after the event, rather it was taken in reaction TO 'something'.

So I don't think this can be binned just yet. Are you expecting further info, Mac?



Yes, more info is definitely required to ascertain what it was or wasn't, as the case may be. I get that motion blur could be additional to distorting the image but I cannot get past the appearance of a seemingly solid, geometrical structure behind the actual tree branches.



posted on Feb, 20 2020 @ 04:49 AM
link   

originally posted by: Macenroe82
a reply to: shawmanfromny

Awesome!

Thank you very much.
And just what I thought - pareidolia

Are you just going to take the opinion of one response or are you going to consider others? I'm not being insulting here because you are most probably a busy man, but you have started a thread and not returned to it, apart from the one occasion. It would be interesting to hear more details.



posted on Feb, 20 2020 @ 08:05 AM
link   
Looks like the 'dumbell type' is visible in both pics. The centre shaft is probably just the exposure on the second pic as it's a drive by7, so looks like trees and exposure times. Dumbell type certainly do exists usually a morphing orb that stretches itself out to form the new shape, but as far as this one looks like trees as somebody else said above drive by exposure for the horizontal shaft



posted on Feb, 20 2020 @ 10:25 AM
link   
Without further data or witness collaboration, one would be hard-pressed to conclude much of anything -too many variables are unknown.

Consequently, until more is known, I'll keep it in the "Unknowns" file.

But my current vote is pareidolia: it could look like anything your personal imagination tries to tag it with: giant dumbbell, cell tower, motion blur on tree branches, bunny rabbit, balloons, extremely odd-shaped intelligently-piloted flying aircraft, etc. - take your 'pic'...

But thanks for posting, O.P. O.P.?... ...was beamed up, I guess...




*sigh*

edit on 2/20/2020 by Outrageo because: Cme@L5



posted on Feb, 21 2020 @ 03:57 PM
link   

originally posted by: ufoorbhunter
Looks like the 'dumbell type' is visible in both pics. The centre shaft is probably just the exposure on the second pic as it's a drive by7, so looks like trees and exposure times. Dumbell type certainly do exists usually a morphing orb that stretches itself out to form the new shape, but as far as this one looks like trees as somebody else said above drive by exposure for the horizontal shaft

Why are the trees immediately adjacent not suffering the same motion blur? Like ConfusedBrit says, there had to be a stimulus for the photographer to take the pic and I suggest the 'dumbell' shape was apparent from a different angle. Like someone else suggests, the OP has considered it a case of pareidolia, so no point in following it up any more.



posted on Feb, 23 2020 @ 07:26 AM
link   
a reply to: fromtheskydown

Good points fromthesky downand maybe this image shouldn't be dismissed straight away. I do apologise for writing the shaft off as a drive by exposure issue, maybe there is more to it than that and on second thoughts it does look like something solid and as you state "Why are the trees immediately adjacent not suffering the same motion blur?"



posted on Feb, 24 2020 @ 10:58 AM
link   
...Isn’t it just a building in both photos?



posted on Feb, 25 2020 @ 10:03 AM
link   
a reply to: JamesChessman

Yeah it might be a building but we have to also acknowledge that some UFO types do seem to be very comfortable around the trees, indeed they seem very good at zipping between the trunks and branches plus hiding out behind them



posted on Feb, 25 2020 @ 06:13 PM
link   
Hey guys, sorry for going silent here.

This thread wouldn't open for me from my laptop.
I finally tried it on my IPAD and low and behold its working.

A bit more information,

The witness is suffering from some type of anxiety induced paranoia.

I received a total of 6 images from him.
A few look as if they were taken through an aquarium or something and then corrupted.
The witness tells me he sees various super structures, robots and alien entities in these images.

I have an open mind, but when I get images of supposed objects that can only be seen by the submitter, I begin to move more towards mental illness.

The final image I was sent contained an orb he said that he watched through his view finder.
When he tried looking for it with the naked eye "It would cloak itself" his words not mine.
I took a look at The object in the picture, and concluded it was a lens flare from the sun.

I think Confused Brit is going in the right direction with this picture - the image blur does add to the appearance of the object having some solidity.

But I have to admit, at first glance it does look like there is an actual object there.



posted on Feb, 25 2020 @ 06:16 PM
link   
a reply to: fromtheskydown

Hey,
I apologize for going silent.
Every time I tried to view the thread via my laptop the screen would just time out.
Then I went off my shift rotation and had some family matters to deal with.

I tried to view the thread today on my Ipad and it opened right away.
I didn't mean to abandon the thread.
Sorry about that!



posted on Feb, 25 2020 @ 09:52 PM
link   

originally posted by: ufoorbhunter
a reply to: JamesChessman

Yeah it might be a building but we have to also acknowledge that some UFO types do seem to be very comfortable around the trees, indeed they seem very good at zipping between the trunks and branches plus hiding out behind them



Good points, I am a believer in UFO’s, but I was just trying to make sense of this case. It could be that I’m missing something, but in the two pics we’ve seen, I’d guess that we’re seeing a distant building...

Idk...



posted on Feb, 25 2020 @ 10:37 PM
link   

originally posted by: Macenroe82

Hey guys, sorry for going silent here.

This thread wouldn't open for me from my laptop.
I finally tried it on my IPAD and low and behold its working.

A bit more information,

The witness is suffering from some type of anxiety induced paranoia.

I received a total of 6 images from him.
A few look as if they were taken through an aquarium or something and then corrupted.
The witness tells me he sees various super structures, robots and alien entities in these images.

I have an open mind, but when I get images of supposed objects that can only be seen by the submitter, I begin to move more towards mental illness.

The final image I was sent contained an orb he said that he watched through his view finder.
When he tried looking for it with the naked eye "It would cloak itself" his words not mine.
I took a look at The object in the picture, and concluded it was a lens flare from the sun.

I think Confused Brit is going in the right direction with this picture - the image blur does add to the appearance of the object having some solidity.

But I have to admit, at first glance it does look like there is an actual object there.


Just to make sure, how about posting the other pics?



posted on Feb, 26 2020 @ 05:53 AM
link   
Sure, here are a few other pics he sent - with his titles

Image of a cloud casting a shadow


Zoomed in


The Goddess


Green Orb

edit on 26-2-2020 by Macenroe82 because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 26 2020 @ 07:54 AM
link   
a reply to: JamesChessman

Oh yeah for sure and total respect for that James it's a puzzler for sure and every angle needs looking at. As far as trees go and their relationship with UFOs especially the orb type and even dumbell types then it would be a goodn in the future to start a new post about it as there could well be something to it. Not wanting to derail the thread but the relationship between UFO and tree is their for full investigation, it might even be like the ships are the souls of the trees or something. As you say and it's so true idk................



posted on Feb, 26 2020 @ 09:53 AM
link   
For those who were wondering if there was any buildings or towers in the area.
Here is a screenshot where the image was taken - according to the GPS tag in the metadata.




new topics

top topics



 
4
<<   2 >>

log in

join