It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I can agree to that, however the notion that there is some rift and "throwing of people under the bus" is ridiculous.
originally posted by: shawmanfromny
a reply to: Grambler
Well, Fox Business News host Lou Dobbs shares your views and definitely doesn't think "Barr is the man."
“I guess I’m so disappointed in Bill Barr — I have to say this,” he said. “It’s a damn shame when he doesn’t get what this president has gone through and what the American people have gone through, and what his charge is as attorney general.”
“Where the hell is the report? Where the hell are the indictments? Where the hell are the charges against the politically corrupt deep state within the Justice Department?” he then angrily asked, referring to the DOJ’s ongoing investigation into the Russian collusion delusion probe.
During a 2017 House Intelligence Committee session, then-congressman Trey Gowdy (R-South Carolina) asked Brennan if the Steele Dossier had been used in compiling the ICA. The former CIA chief replied “No.”
“It wasn’t part of the corpus of intelligence information that we had,” Brennan expounded. "It was not in any way used as a basis for the Intelligence Community Assessment that was done. It was not.”
What more likely is barr drug his feet in Ukraine, trump is furious barr didn’t step in especially during impeachment and announce the corruption, so Rudy was forced to get personally involved
But I am supposed to believe barr is just now suddenly getting info about Biden’s,Obama, Ukraine corruption and he will wrap it up before the 2020 election?
It’s clear why these lawyers resigned to me...They don’t need to be there shielding they corrupt if the guy in charge, Barr, is corrupt
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: randomtangentsrme
a reply to: Grambler
What if. . .
A prosecutor cannot be shown to be objective if their boss publicly shares opinions on social media?
My god!!!!
The democrats could use that to start an investigation!!!!
They may even complain about it on their media!!!!!
Yes, trump and the republicans need to do whatever they can to ensure they dont upset the democrats
So lets not investigate the Obama/Biden corruption in Ukraine,
lets not talk publicly about the fbi abuses of the fisa report, lets not talk publicly about comeys abuses, lets not talk publicly about the russia hoax; cause there could hypothetically be investigations into all of that.
Its cool though, im sure the media will tell the american people about the corruption
If not, even if trump loses in 2020 as he sat around not informing the entire country of the obvious corruption of these people, im sure barr will get around to finally charging someone with a crime around 2030 or so.
originally posted by: Boadicea
a reply to: Grambler
What more likely is barr drug his feet in Ukraine, trump is furious barr didn’t step in especially during impeachment and announce the corruption, so Rudy was forced to get personally involved
I think that's exactly what is happening. Part of the "perfect" phone call with Zelensky was all about working with Barr and Rudy to get this information. There was much hullaballoo at the time about whether it was appropriate for Rudy -- as Trump's attorney -- to be involved. So it seems from what we know that Trump was trying his darnedest to get Barr to do his job... and Barr has drug his feet and given excuse after excuse for why he can't/won't do his job.
I would also expect that Trump is wondering why Barr hasn't released any information yet that Trump gave Barr the authority to release. Trump probably thought it would be better explained and presented by Barr, who has the necessary legal background and expertise to understand and explain the whys and wherefores to the public. Barr has not done so, with no explanation beyond "derp derp derp"... don't need to be a lawyer to understand gaslighting.
And that's just what I think is going on here.
originally posted by: JBurns
Agreed
Now it looks like McCabe may not be facing charges? If this is true, it is time to look at other ways forward outside he existing framework/system we've been operating under.
This case, along with others, will determine whether we have a valid system of Justice to save or a tyrannical farce to repeal and replace.
You have drinken the kool-aid my friend. There have been zero facts showing any guilt by the Bidens in Ukraine..
The most reasonable explanation is that their evidence is just a bunch of crap that needs to be twisted to show any guilt.