It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: lostbook
a reply to: Trueman
I do think that something should be done to limit retaliation against whistle-blowers. This could set a dangerous precident if not.
originally posted by: jhn7537
I think Trump has EVERY right as President to remove anyone working against his policies, especially people who weren't voted into their public office roles, but were merely placed there by the past administration to work against President Trump. Schumer can try this stunt out, but its only that, a stunt.. Trump had every right to remove Vindman, Sondland and others from their positions within the administration
originally posted by: JON666
originally posted by: jhn7537
I think Trump has EVERY right as President to remove anyone working against his policies, especially people who weren't voted into their public office roles, but were merely placed there by the past administration to work against President Trump. Schumer can try this stunt out, but its only that, a stunt.. Trump had every right to remove Vindman, Sondland and others from their positions within the administration
Trump should of cleaned house his first day fire all Obama appointees and GWH neocons that was his first and maybe his fatal mistake.
I do not agree with the anonymity element to the whistleblower law.
originally posted by: scraedtosleep
a reply to: fringeofthefringe
I do not agree with the anonymity element to the whistleblower law.
What's your real name?
originally posted by: Trueman
a reply to: bigfatfurrytexan
Chuck is full of it. Nobody fired Vindman.
Army Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman expects to serve out the remainder of his time on the National Security Council, according to his attorney.
"He is still there," White House press secretary Stephanie Grisham also confirmed to the Washington Examiner.
Just moved to different area. All this cry democrats doing now just confirms that they got hit where it hurts.
www.washingtonexaminer.com...
originally posted by: scraedtosleep
a reply to: fringeofthefringe
I do not agree with the anonymity element to the whistleblower law.
What's your real name?
originally posted by: scraedtosleep
a reply to: fringeofthefringe
I do not agree with the anonymity element to the whistleblower law.
What's your real name?
originally posted by: Riffrafter
originally posted by: fringeofthefringe
Or maybe it was part of his plan.
What plan would that be?
originally posted by: scraedtosleep
a reply to: fringeofthefringe
So you do understand why someone would want or need to keep their identity a secret.
originally posted by: fringeofthefringe
www.foxnews.com... U.S. whistleblower laws exist to protect the identity and careers of people who bring forward accusations of wrongdoing by government officials.
Lawmakers in both parties have historically backed those protections.
www.abovetopsecret.com...
What does this mean?
What is the timeframe to make his identity known?