It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Raggedyman
Not exactly draining the swamp
That and the wall were what I was really expecting as the two key policies that needed to be followed through
originally posted by: incoserv
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Scepticaldem
Never said that.
But Mueller wasn't wrong. The laws were against an honest outcome.
He's still impeached. Forever.
And I did say that was going to happen.
Actually ... he's AQUITTED forever. The Democrats are proven wrong for ever.
That's how it works, see? When someone is accused of something, goes through a trial and it's found innocent, it's called an [I]aquittal[/I]. It means the accusation is legally declared nul and void.
However, Nancy Pelosi and people who quote her will forever remain ignorant.
:
Yah and then ripped up his SOTU speech in front of the entire country... pretty upset they didn’t win.
originally posted by: Ironclad1964
originally posted by: incoserv
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Scepticaldem
Never said that.
But Mueller wasn't wrong. The laws were against an honest outcome.
He's still impeached. Forever.
And I did say that was going to happen.
Actually ... he's AQUITTED forever. The Democrats are proven wrong for ever.
That's how it works, see? When someone is accused of something, goes through a trial and it's found innocent, it's called an [I]aquittal[/I]. It means the accusation is legally declared nul and void.
However, Nancy Pelosi and people who quote her will forever remain ignorant.
:
He's only impeached for ever in their minds because it makes them feel less of a total failure in life and politics..
They probably covered their ears at the acquittal and started making loud "la, la, la, la, la", sounds to drown out the verdict and then fantasized that it all came out in their favor and they are heroes..
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Scepticaldem
Never said that.
But Mueller wasn't wrong. The laws were against an honest outcome.
He's still impeached. Forever.
And I did say that was going to happen.
originally posted by: Sillyolme
When does this show get on the damn road. I've been reading these previews for three years now.
Good thing I wasn't holding my breath.
I hope none of you are either.
This is like when an adult "talks" in a Charlie Brown cartoon.
Bwomp bwomp bwomp. Blah blah blah. I
Lol
originally posted by: djz3ro
Even here in the UK we knew the wall was never getting built
and the swamp was never gonna be drained (it's where Trump and people like him, Nigel Farage and Boris Johnston, or BawJaws, for two)...
originally posted by: LordAhriman
Over the past 3 years we've seen this exact thread posted away least 100 times with different wording. This time is no different.
#TickTock
originally posted by: carewemust
originally posted by: LordAhriman
Over the past 3 years we've seen this exact thread posted away least 100 times with different wording. This time is no different.
#TickTock
2/11/2020
Here is a CBS news clip with (the always accurate) Catherine Herridge explaining what Lindsey Graham told her this morning. The relevant content begins at the 1:15 mark. (1min 15secs into the 7min 34sec video)
Subpoenas this week, with Senate Hearings in early March for Obama's SpyMasters: www.cbsnews.com...
Here We Go! Another REAL investigation is about to begin.
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: fringeofthefringe
Also, Since President Trump's Acquittal last week:
Impeachment conspirators, the Twin Vindman Brothers, and Ambassador Gordan Sondland, removed from their positions.
Since the Mueller Investigation was also a SET-UP, just like the Trump Impeachment circus, President Trump's DOJ is making moves to reverse some of Special Counsel Bob Mueller's and FBI indictments. (So far, General Flynn and Roger Stone.)
Senator Lindsey Graham says "half" of the people who set up counter-intelligence operations to sabotage candidate Trump's campaign, and later attempted to force him from the Presidency, will be INDICTED by prosecutor John Durham.
originally posted by: Bloodworth
originally posted by: Raggedyman
Not exactly draining the swamp
That and the wall were what I was really expecting as the two key policies that needed to be followed through
They are pouring nice foundations first using the sand they are digging out.
And right after that cement is laid the wall goes up pretty fast.
For the level of opposition trump has been receiving. He is getting it done
Source: www.washingtonexaminer.com... nt
A top Republican threatened to involve the Justice Department if the Intelligence Community inspector general refuses to deliver "documentary evidence" involving the whistleblower whose complaint spurred the impeachment investigation into President Trump.
Rep. Devin Nunes, the ranking member on the House Intelligence Committee, gave Inspector General Michael Atkinson until Valentines Friday (2/14/2020) to hand over information that could help illuminate questions surrounding the timeline and procedural protocol used to vet the whistleblower complaint that centered on Trump's July 25 phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.
The California Republican decried what he called the "unusual handling" of the complaint process and said he will refer the matter to the Justice Department if Atkinson's office refuses to comply, after months of outreach.
House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy and Rep. Jim Jordan first raised concerns along with Nunes about the process in a Sept. 30, 2019 letter to Atkinson. The Republican trio found Atkinson's response "incomplete, vague, and/or evasive."
Nunes sent another letter to the IGIC office on Jan. 11 but again determined the inspector general's answers to be "equally unsatisfactory."
The whistleblower, believed by some to be career CIA analyst Eric Ciaramella, filed a complaint to Atkinson's office on Aug. 12, 2019. Atkinson determined the complaint to be "urgent" and credible. And with permission from the acting director of national intelligence, notified Congress of its existence. Thus sparking what would become the impeachment of President Trump by the Democrat-controlled U.S. House.
Nunes, a vocal defender of the president, has expressed particular concern with a change to the whistleblower complaint submission form. A change that allowed for "hearsay" information to be included.
"The investigation is particularly focused on the guidelines that appeared on a whistleblower complaint submission form that was changed — after the submission of the whistleblower complaint — to eliminate language excluding hearsay information."
Republicans raised concerns about the timing of changes to the whistleblower complaint form.
But Atkinson defended the filing process, claiming the intelligence community has the authority to launch investigations based on second-hand information, and that the change in form had no direct connection to the timing of the whistleblower complaint on Aug. 12.
The Justice Department Office of Legal Counsel issued a statement saying it believed the whistleblower complaint did not possess an "urgent concern."