It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I heard something about Chi-Coms infiltrating .... it’s not hard to imagine the guy is a plant.
originally posted by: Irishhaf
The guy needed to be gone without even taking into account if he lied or not with his testimony, Think I read a couple different times over his career he was caught running down the US to foreign officials while serving in an official capacity for the US govt.
My how the Mighty fall.
originally posted by: JoseGarcia
originally posted by: CriticalStinker
Personally I don't think people should be fired so long as they are telling the truth about their superiors (again, I don't know if that's the case here). If you're good at your job, than that's what matters.
IIRC, He was NOT telling the truth. He set himself up as judge jury & executioner on matters beyond his knowledge & certainly beyond his rank.
He presumed to be ABOVE THE COMMANDER IN CHIEF in knowledge, wisdom & policy. What a treasonous seditious idiot.
Oh cmon.. the guy had a vendetta against Trump if he was telling a foreign power to dismiss the Commander in Chief. The President is his boss, not the other way around. His sacking is the best remedy for this failed coup. In fact I’d like to see a treason charge for it.
originally posted by: Pyle
originally posted by: CriticalStinker
a reply to: shawmanfromny
By all appearances he shouldn't have been there.
He didn't strike me as dishonest as he did in over his head. They guys seemed rather forthright that he didn't know sh**. It's kind of funny when you look at it.
He doesn't seem like a liar, though my impression would say he's biased and anti Trump if he's going to testify while running in circles.
Doesn't bother me that he got fired... That being said, I stand by my post on page one that the right would defend him if the tables were turned. I also think we should just be honest about what happened. (I still haven't seen what he did in Ukraine as some have suggested, telling people not to listen to Trump... Depending on the context I could change my tune if that's the case).
He didnt know # because Trump didnt tell people who needed to know that a change in policy was happening because Trump wanted it secret for "Reasons" and then backpedaled when found out.
originally posted by: ThirdEyeofHorus
My how the Mighty fall.
originally posted by: CriticalStinker
originally posted by: CriticalStinker
We should have the patriot act, but seeth when "our guy" gets spied on by the state.
Do you see the confliction in those lines or thinking?
It's all our nothing. We say the federal government is on a leash, or we accept their abuse of power. Partisanship, and the justification of actions to fit your party lines creates the very environment in which this circus flourishes.
originally posted by: ThomasSanz
a reply to: JoseGarcia
Can the Vinny nannies be stripped of their uniforms and medals for their actions be against the USA?
originally posted by: ThomasSanz
a reply to: CriticalStinker. The documentation reflected that he was betraying the highest position in the USA by telling politicians in foreign nation not to listen to the stips from Trump. The Ukrainian Ambassador was doing the same thing - she told Ukrainian leaders not to obey Trump because he would be impeached anyways. She was also fired. In the old days - both of those betrayers would have been court martialed - and worse.
originally posted by: Ahabstar
Well with 6.8 million viewers of the debates on Friday despite people tuning in to see how they respond to impeachment failure. And these three firings (so far) today, looks like the Dems went 0 for 7 this week.