It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Romney "Not Invited" to the Party

page: 1
35
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join
share:
+24 more 
posted on Jan, 31 2020 @ 08:46 PM
link   
That's good measure. He is the bad apple. A RINO...., or worse. This guy got an stigma forever.


Leaders of the annual Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) on Friday night formally disinvited Sen. Mitt Romney (R-Utah) from attending the event next month over his vote to approve additional witnesses in the Senate impeachment trial.


www.msn.com...




posted on Jan, 31 2020 @ 08:49 PM
link   
Say it ain't so, not Pierre!



posted on Jan, 31 2020 @ 08:49 PM
link   
a reply to: Trueman

Just a bitter Bonesman.



posted on Jan, 31 2020 @ 08:52 PM
link   
That isn't right. He should have been invited. He may be voting against not having witnesses to show that the Republicans are not voting partisan. Not one Democrat voted against impeachment in the house, remember that, so that definitely shows that that vote was party orientated. The Senator from Alaska was thinking about voting for witnesses but in the end changed her mind. That also shows that Republican Senators were actually considering voting for the witness being allowed. So it was a real good move to prove that they considered it anyway.

No such thing happened in the house at all, not one house Democrat even considered not voting to impeach from what I get.

We cannot make assumptions as to what the Republicans are thinking and blast Romney for this. Oops, maybe I should not be saying this, there are Democrats here who may leak a possible tactic being used.

On the other hand, Romney may just be voting his conscience, and that is all right, it did not effect anything. Romney is a stout Christian and does believe in making sure if possible that things are done correctly.
edit on 31-1-2020 by rickymouse because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 31 2020 @ 09:02 PM
link   
a reply to: Trueman

Head on a pike?

That was fast!


edit on 31-1-2020 by Sookiechacha because: (no reason given)


+9 more 
posted on Jan, 31 2020 @ 09:09 PM
link   
a reply to: rickymouse

Romney has been a clown shoe for years.

Dis-inviting him is petty and juvenile, but he deserves all the scorn he gets.


+5 more 
posted on Jan, 31 2020 @ 09:09 PM
link   
a reply to: Trueman

FYI: A Senator "Recall" petition and bill are being introduced in Romney's state of Utah.

Petition: nationalfile.com...

Bill: noqreport.com...


+7 more 
posted on Jan, 31 2020 @ 09:09 PM
link   
a reply to: rickymouse

He will have fingers pointing at him forever. He must deal with his karma. Deserved 100%.


+7 more 
posted on Jan, 31 2020 @ 09:11 PM
link   

originally posted by: rickymouse
That isn't right. He should have been invited.


Why? CPAC is the Conservative Political Action Conference. No one has the RIGHT to be invited. If Romney shows he is not at all conservatve, why should he even be there? CPAC has standards. Romney does not meet them. Too friggin' bad!


+21 more 
posted on Jan, 31 2020 @ 09:17 PM
link   
a reply to: rickymouse
He is not a Christian. He put his faith in Joseph Smith, and the Mafia called the Mormon church. He is an arrogant turd.


+5 more 
posted on Jan, 31 2020 @ 09:19 PM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: Trueman

FYI: A Senator "Recall" petition and bill are being introduced in Romney's state of Utah.

Petition: nationalfile.com...

Bill: noqreport.com...





You beat me to it...

Mitt may be in trouble... Utah is as conservative, as they get. Utah is Trump country.

Mitt still has a snag in his panties, because he lost the nomination. He, arguably, lost to the two most divisive Presidential candidates in history, if you include Pres. Obama in 2012. He's bitter, spiteful and petty.

He may get recalled, because he acted upon his bruised ego. Awwwwwww....


+2 more 
posted on Jan, 31 2020 @ 09:19 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: Trueman

Head on a pike?

That was fast!



Just wait till you see where Nancys head goes.

In the toilet

With a swift flush

And a thorough hand washing afterwards



posted on Jan, 31 2020 @ 09:20 PM
link   

originally posted by: rickymouse
That isn't right. He should have been invited. He may be voting against not having witnesses to show that the Republicans are not voting partisan. Not one Democrat voted against impeachment in the house, remember that, so that definitely shows that that vote was party orientated. The Senator from Alaska was thinking about voting for witnesses but in the end changed her mind. That also shows that Republican Senators were actually considering voting for the witness being allowed. So it was a real good move to prove that they considered it anyway.

No such thing happened in the house at all, not one house Democrat even considered not voting to impeach from what I get.

We cannot make assumptions as to what the Republicans are thinking and blast Romney for this. Oops, maybe I should not be saying this, there are Democrats here who may leak a possible tactic being used.

On the other hand, Romney may just be voting his conscience, and that is all right, it did not effect anything. Romney is a stout Christian and does believe in making sure if possible that things are done correctly.


With all due respect, Romney isn't a Christian. In label only. If it doesn't act like a Christian, it isn't one. The un-American things he has voted for prove that. And this long before Trump won the election.

Also being a member of the Skull and Bones society, he is bound to follow that oath first, plus he is CFR and other linked globalist ties. Those links are Luciferian as is the Skull and Bones club. Of course they all say they are Christians so the sheep will follow them.


+5 more 
posted on Jan, 31 2020 @ 09:20 PM
link   
Romney is still butthurt that Trump won the presidency on his 1st go around, just like McCain was.
He lost both times he ran, just like McCain did.


+9 more 
posted on Jan, 31 2020 @ 09:21 PM
link   
a reply to: rickymouse

Actually, two House Democrats voted against both articles of impeachment, and one voted against the obstruction article. Tulsi Gabbard simply voted present, neither for nor against.

One of the two who voted against the impeachment in the House actually switched parties and decided to become a Republican he was so disgusted with the Democrat Party.


edit on 31-1-2020 by queenofswords because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 31 2020 @ 09:22 PM
link   
So, you guys are saying that Romney just accidentally helped the Republican party by proving the Republicans are not partisan in the senate? Hmmm. god works in strange ways.



posted on Jan, 31 2020 @ 09:22 PM
link   

originally posted by: madmac5150

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: Trueman

FYI: A Senator "Recall" petition and bill are being introduced in Romney's state of Utah.

Petition: nationalfile.com...

Bill: noqreport.com...





You beat me to it...

Mitt may be in trouble... Utah is as conservative, as they get. Utah is Trump country.

Mitt still has a snag in his panties, because he lost the nomination. He, arguably, lost to the two most divisive Presidential candidates in history, if you include Pres. Obama in 2012. He's bitter, spiteful and petty.

He may get recalled, because he acted upon his bruised ego. Awwwwwww....


He's bitter, spiteful and petty.

Exactly



posted on Jan, 31 2020 @ 09:23 PM
link   

originally posted by: rickymouse
That isn't right. He should have been invited. He may be voting against not having witnesses to show that the Republicans are not voting partisan. Not one Democrat voted against impeachment in the house, remember that, so that definitely shows that that vote was party orientated. The Senator from Alaska was thinking about voting for witnesses but in the end changed her mind. That also shows that Republican Senators were actually considering voting for the witness being allowed. So it was a real good move to prove that they considered it anyway.

No such thing happened in the house at all, not one house Democrat even considered not voting to impeach from what I get.

We cannot make assumptions as to what the Republicans are thinking and blast Romney for this. Oops, maybe I should not be saying this, there are Democrats here who may leak a possible tactic being used.

On the other hand, Romney may just be voting his conscience, and that is all right, it did not effect anything. Romney is a stout Christian and does believe in making sure if possible that things are done correctly.


Never mind, someone beat me to it.

edit on 31-1-2020 by HalWesten because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 31 2020 @ 09:25 PM
link   
a reply to: madmac5150

I thought Mitt had a few wives and several children out in Utah.



posted on Jan, 31 2020 @ 09:25 PM
link   
a reply to: Trueman

Romney "Not Invited" to the Party

But his momma is.







top topics



 
35
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join