dems won't accept acquittal. No, really

originally posted by: dfnj2015
a reply to: network dude

Acquittal means it's a sham and not a trial.

It’s definitely a “sham” alright. The entire population has been saying that for six months now

Glad to see you acknowledge that fact

EXACTLY! This impeachment is a sham. It's always been a sham.

Finally, you're seeing the light. Thank you, for admitting it.

a reply to: network dude

Thanks.

So why does this thread exist? What are we talking about?

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: game over man

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: game over man

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: game over man

originally posted by: Middleoftheroad
a reply to: Admitted2

The trial already happened in the House. The Senate just votes on the evidence the house has gathered whether to remove the president or not. Bolton could’ve been called as a witness in the House but they wanted to rush impeachment as a campaign tool because doing it the legal way would’ve taken to long and the 2020 election would already be over. It’s the only reason they rushed the impeachment vote.

Not only Bolton and other witnesses but the server too. Both parties are efffing we us. It's too bad the Republican voters are a cult. Democrat voters would overthrow corruption in a heartbeat. All the Democratic canidates are doing that to one another right now. Imagine if Republican voters kept their belief system but would also vote to remove corrupt politicians. I want the 2 party system to end, no more white house, and rewrite a 2020 Constitution instead of living by one over 200 years old written by a bunch of Free Masons.

An anti-constitutionalist. Interesting. Are you against Freedom as well, or just the USA?

Current President is against freedom of the press. Do you want to continue to go by the Constitution for another 200 years? 500 years? 1000 years? Iceland had reform.

The constitution has done a fantastic job so far, I see no reason to change it. If you feel it needs to change, there is a process you must go through. If you need help on how to go about that, let me know.

Oh yeah the Constitution has never been ammended. It has been changed, why did you say the Constitution has never been changed?

a process was followed and amendments were made. Perhaps you don't understand that, but I assure you they didn't just print them up. Again, if you want something changed, go through the process. You leftovers sure don't like rules much, do you.

No....you said the Constitution has never been changed, I said it has.

originally posted by: Tekner

originally posted by: Ksihkehe

originally posted by: Admitted2
I would accept acquittal.

In a trial without witnesses, what else could there be? We see and hear no facts.

Long may he reign.

There was plenty of opportunity for the house to gather information and call witnesses. As the majority leaders made clear they were in control and had overwhelming evidence. If all the evidence was in and so damning what's the point of muddying the water with more witnesses?

They could have said they were willing to let Joe and Hunter testify and I'm sure the POTUS would have been fine with it. Then the whistleblower could have testified and purjured himself followed by Schiff and another purjury.

This guy has already gone through 15+ pages of posters telling him this. Then asked for his account to be deleted only to make a new one. There's no helping him, he has no arguments, he'll just repeat the same "muh witnesses".

I was having more fun pretending I didn't know.

Thanks buzzkill!

originally posted by: Breakthestreak

originally posted by: game over man

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: game over man

originally posted by: Middleoftheroad
a reply to: Admitted2

The trial already happened in the House. The Senate just votes on the evidence the house has gathered whether to remove the president or not. Bolton could’ve been called as a witness in the House but they wanted to rush impeachment as a campaign tool because doing it the legal way would’ve taken to long and the 2020 election would already be over. It’s the only reason they rushed the impeachment vote.

Not only Bolton and other witnesses but the server too. Both parties are efffing we us. It's too bad the Republican voters are a cult. Democrat voters would overthrow corruption in a heartbeat. All the Democratic canidates are doing that to one another right now. Imagine if Republican voters kept their belief system but would also vote to remove corrupt politicians. I want the 2 party system to end, no more white house, and rewrite a 2020 Constitution instead of living by one over 200 years old written by a bunch of Free Masons.

An anti-constitutionalist. Interesting. Are you against Freedom as well, or just the USA?

Current President is against freedom of the press. Do you want to continue to go by the Constitution for another 200 years? 500 years? 1000 years? Iceland had reform.

That’s a lie. You’re parroting media lies.

Hypocritical don't you think coming from the Fox hole?

Of course it will. Plenty of dumb people out there still.

But seriously, we need a strong opposition, or else it tips to far and things become irreversable. I am a conservative but have moderate views on certain issues. You tip things too far and you...well, you get bad things.


a reply to: RazorV66

Ohhh right, ATS is Trump porn.

Keep fapping my friends.

originally posted by: Hypntick
a reply to: game over man

I'm sure Iceland would love to receive you. Amending the constitution is perfectly fine, as long as it's a sensible amendment. You don't want a repeat of the 18th do you? The constitution isn't there to limit rights, but to codify them.

Iceland and every country would welcome me, thanks for the compliment. Icelanders are good people. What about you? Would you be welcomed by locals from other countries?

originally posted by: dfnj2015
a reply to: network dude

Acquittal means it's a sham and not a trial.

Non-participating character parrots Pelosi exactly as seen on the propaganda medium known as TV - colour me surprised.

originally posted by: game over man

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: game over man

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: game over man

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: game over man

originally posted by: Middleoftheroad
a reply to: Admitted2

The trial already happened in the House. The Senate just votes on the evidence the house has gathered whether to remove the president or not. Bolton could’ve been called as a witness in the House but they wanted to rush impeachment as a campaign tool because doing it the legal way would’ve taken to long and the 2020 election would already be over. It’s the only reason they rushed the impeachment vote.

Not only Bolton and other witnesses but the server too. Both parties are efffing we us. It's too bad the Republican voters are a cult. Democrat voters would overthrow corruption in a heartbeat. All the Democratic canidates are doing that to one another right now. Imagine if Republican voters kept their belief system but would also vote to remove corrupt politicians. I want the 2 party system to end, no more white house, and rewrite a 2020 Constitution instead of living by one over 200 years old written by a bunch of Free Masons.

An anti-constitutionalist. Interesting. Are you against Freedom as well, or just the USA?

Current President is against freedom of the press. Do you want to continue to go by the Constitution for another 200 years? 500 years? 1000 years? Iceland had reform.

The constitution has done a fantastic job so far, I see no reason to change it. If you feel it needs to change, there is a process you must go through. If you need help on how to go about that, let me know.

Oh yeah the Constitution has never been ammended. It has been changed, why did you say the Constitution has never been changed?

a process was followed and amendments were made. Perhaps you don't understand that, but I assure you they didn't just print them up. Again, if you want something changed, go through the process. You leftovers sure don't like rules much, do you.

No....you said the Constitution has never been changed, I said it has.

LOL, tantrum alert!!!!

here sport, your chance to either be a hero, or a giant zero. Quote me.

a reply to: game over man

“The President opposes freedom of the press”

No. He doesn’t. You’re parroting media lies. Including your beloved Fox News

a reply to: network dude

The constitution has done a fantastic job so far, I see no reason to change it.

In response to the 1789 Constitution. The Constitution has been changed since 1789.

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: game over man

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: game over man

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: game over man

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: game over man

originally posted by: Middleoftheroad
a reply to: Admitted2

The trial already happened in the House. The Senate just votes on the evidence the house has gathered whether to remove the president or not. Bolton could’ve been called as a witness in the House but they wanted to rush impeachment as a campaign tool because doing it the legal way would’ve taken to long and the 2020 election would already be over. It’s the only reason they rushed the impeachment vote.

Not only Bolton and other witnesses but the server too. Both parties are efffing we us. It's too bad the Republican voters are a cult. Democrat voters would overthrow corruption in a heartbeat. All the Democratic canidates are doing that to one another right now. Imagine if Republican voters kept their belief system but would also vote to remove corrupt politicians. I want the 2 party system to end, no more white house, and rewrite a 2020 Constitution instead of living by one over 200 years old written by a bunch of Free Masons.

An anti-constitutionalist. Interesting. Are you against Freedom as well, or just the USA?

Current President is against freedom of the press. Do you want to continue to go by the Constitution for another 200 years? 500 years? 1000 years? Iceland had reform.

The constitution has done a fantastic job so far, I see no reason to change it. If you feel it needs to change, there is a process you must go through. If you need help on how to go about that, let me know.

Oh yeah the Constitution has never been ammended. It has been changed, why did you say the Constitution has never been changed?

a process was followed and amendments were made. Perhaps you don't understand that, but I assure you they didn't just print them up. Again, if you want something changed, go through the process. You leftovers sure don't like rules much, do you.

No....you said the Constitution has never been changed, I said it has.

LOL, tantrum alert!!!!

here sport, your chance to either be a hero, or a giant zero. Quote me.

Oh, there is huge potential for a number of tantrums in this thread. Bigly. Wait until the acquittal.

Believe me folks. Only the best tantrums.

originally posted by: Admitted2
a reply to: network dude

Thanks.

So why does this thread exist? What are we talking about?

how stupid the house democrats are. thanks for asking.

Since the democrats and evil leftists refuse to accept acquittal, will there be riots?

Lootings?

Burning cars?

Will there be screaming at the sky?

Will pink hats come back into vogue?

I have errands to run this weekend, just asking in case I need to change plans because the BIG NEWS is that Kansas City is playing some loser team from San Fran on Sunday.

a reply to: Breakthestreak

He definitely does, every day, most of the day...way too many examples to bother with...no point in taking the time to post the countless examples to a crowd of extreme Trump cultists.

originally posted by: game over man
a reply to: network dude

The constitution has done a fantastic job so far, I see no reason to change it.

In response to the 1789 Constitution. The Constitution has been changed since 1789.

Oh, well, there is this:

No....you said the Constitution has never been changed, I said it has.

I'm not an expert, but to me, that statement isn't at all what I said.

I'm afraid you loose, game over man.

in other news house dems wont accept the plant is round, demand people show flat earth the respect it deserves; they also refuse no dairy coffee creamer and cool whip

a reply to: network dude

Oh. Seems worthwhile.