It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: loam
Midterms and nearly every special election has gone to the left.
originally posted by: Ansuzrune
a reply to: Sheye
Can petitions be signed to recall a Chief Justice? He seems like he is a globalist deep stater to me.
originally posted by: RalagaNarHallas
a reply to: Metallicus
well they are already on that with this www.wfsb.com...so as i am not DNA smart but does any one know if dna from a semen stain could even still be tested from that far back ,let alone the hurdles of actually proving it was non consensual ,but hey she could always go with it being indelible in her hippocampus and mention putting in extra doors that seemed to work last time
NEW YORK (AP) — Lawyers for a woman who accuses President Donald Trump of raping her in the 1990s are asking for a DNA sample, seeking to determine whether his genetic material is on a dress she says she wore during the encounter. Advice columnist E. Jean Carroll’s lawyers served notice to a Trump attorney Thursday for Trump to submit a sample on March 2 in Washington for “analysis and comparison against unidentified male DNA present on the dress.”
Her lawyer, Roberta Kaplan, then had the black wool coat-style dress tested. A lab report with the legal notice says DNA found in skin cells on the outer surface of the sleeves was a mix of at least four people, at least one of them male.
Several other people were tested and eliminated as possible contributors to the mix, according to the lab report, which was obtained by The Associated Press. Their names are redacted, but the report indicates they were involved in a photo shoot where she wore the dress last year, the only time Carroll says she has donned the dress since the alleged assault.
Yet Pelosi insisted there can be no acquittal -- even if the Senate votes to acquit President Donald Trump, as looks likely.
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: loam
Midterms and nearly every special election has gone to the left.
If he somehow magically does get re-elected the then Democrat house AND Senate will impeach him again and he can hold that record too. First to be impeached twice.
There is no scenario where he becomes the darling of America. He's a rat.
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: DanDanDat
He's only been impeached once but you say they wanted to three times? What did that tell you about him?
I know I know blameless innocent little Donny is so put upon by the world.
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: loam
Midterms and nearly every special election has gone to the left.
If he somehow magically does get re-elected the then Democrat house AND Senate will impeach him again and he can hold that record too. First to be impeached twice.
There is no scenario where he becomes the darling of America. He's a rat.
originally posted by: stosh64
originally posted by: RalagaNarHallas
a reply to: Metallicus
well they are already on that with this www.wfsb.com...so as i am not DNA smart but does any one know if dna from a semen stain could even still be tested from that far back ,let alone the hurdles of actually proving it was non consensual ,but hey she could always go with it being indelible in her hippocampus and mention putting in extra doors that seemed to work last time
NEW YORK (AP) — Lawyers for a woman who accuses President Donald Trump of raping her in the 1990s are asking for a DNA sample, seeking to determine whether his genetic material is on a dress she says she wore during the encounter. Advice columnist E. Jean Carroll’s lawyers served notice to a Trump attorney Thursday for Trump to submit a sample on March 2 in Washington for “analysis and comparison against unidentified male DNA present on the dress.”
I love this part
Her lawyer, Roberta Kaplan, then had the black wool coat-style dress tested. A lab report with the legal notice says DNA found in skin cells on the outer surface of the sleeves was a mix of at least four people, at least one of them male.
Several other people were tested and eliminated as possible contributors to the mix, according to the lab report, which was obtained by The Associated Press. Their names are redacted, but the report indicates they were involved in a photo shoot where she wore the dress last year, the only time Carroll says she has donned the dress since the alleged assault.
So she alleges this assault took place back in the 90's, however, she wore this dress to a photo shoot last year where she acquired new 'DNA'.
She has saved the 'evidence' on this dress since the 90's because she knew it may come in handy some day. So I assume she never washed it. The 'evidence' is kept 2 or 3 decades until one night she thinks, "wouldn't that black wool coat-style dress go perfect for this photo shoot?"
This is so stupid it is surreal, yet here come the desperate Dems who figure WTF, it might just work.
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Gojira54
It tells me he was never fit for office but to each his own.
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Ksihkehe
Why would I be adding your opinion to my post?
I stand behind what I already posted. Those results speak for themselves despite how you think they got there.