It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Pelosi says Trump Will Not Be Acquitted

page: 2
44
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 30 2020 @ 11:05 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sheye

originally posted by: Vector99

originally posted by: Sheye
a reply to: xuenchen

Sounds suspiciously like they may also have the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court in their back pocket, should it come to a tie vote.

Fortunately when it comes to impeachment there is no tie, 67 votes are required, and there's already democrat defectors making statements that they will vote for acquittal, so yeah, there is no chance he will be convicted and removed.

Pelosi is an insane drunk congressional representative, her words mean absolutely nothing to the real world.


That’s good to know.. thanks for the info on how impeachment works.👍🏼

Sounds like you should be giving Pelosi some lessons. 😂 Does she not have helpers around to straighten her out before such huge blunders ? She is speaker of the house after all ? Geeez .. she’s the one making Merica look bad.


You know whats even MORE frightening?? That if both Trump and Pence were killed by aliens or a meteorite or Kobes pilot.. Pelosi would be president.




posted on Jan, 30 2020 @ 11:09 PM
link   
a reply to: Advantage

The smoking gun would be the one she uses to take out 53 senators during the break just ahead of the removal vote.

Only way Trump doesn’t get acquitted.



posted on Jan, 30 2020 @ 11:10 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sheye

originally posted by: Vector99

originally posted by: Sheye
a reply to: xuenchen

Sounds suspiciously like they may also have the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court in their back pocket, should it come to a tie vote.

Fortunately when it comes to impeachment there is no tie, 67 votes are required, and there's already democrat defectors making statements that they will vote for acquittal, so yeah, there is no chance he will be convicted and removed.

Pelosi is an insane drunk congressional representative, her words mean absolutely nothing to the real world.


That’s good to know.. thanks for the info on how impeachment works.👍🏼

Sounds like you should be giving Pelosi some lessons. 😂 Does she not have helpers around to straighten her out before such huge blunders ? She is speaker of the house after all ? Geeez .. she’s the one making Merica look bad.


Pelosi is a drunk lunatic.

Period.

Carry on.



posted on Jan, 30 2020 @ 11:12 PM
link   

originally posted by: Ahabstar
a reply to: Advantage

The smoking gun would be the one she uses to take out 53 senators during the break just ahead of the removal vote.

Only way Trump doesn’t get acquitted.


LOL!! This whole thing has gotten me so annoyed I hope she has some violent herpes outbreak or something just for putting everyone through such a farce. Id suggest she turn that smoking gun toward herself, but that wouldnt be very nice of me. ( DO it nancy... )



posted on Jan, 30 2020 @ 11:16 PM
link   
a reply to: Stupidsecrets

Both Schiff and Schumer have said multiple times that the House case against President Trump was "air tight". They shot themselves in the foot alright.

And Pelosi miscalculated by holding onto the impeachment articles, thinking that McConnell would allow any new witnesses and evidence included in the trial. (Rumor is she paid Bolton $150,000 to insert negatives in his book. She's a SUCKER.)



posted on Jan, 30 2020 @ 11:44 PM
link   

originally posted by: RalagaNarHallas
a reply to: Metallicus

So as i am not DNA smart but does any one know if dna from a semen stain could even still be tested from that far back ,let alone the hurdles of actually proving it was non consensual ,but hey she could always go with it being indelible in her hippocampus and mention putting in extra doors that seemed to work last time


It's not even semen. It's "touch" DNA. Essentially trace skin cells. It's of debatable reliability, it means nothing. They're asking for it because they KNOW that he'll refuse. Then they claim refusal is guilt and she sells more books.

edit on 1/30/20 by Ksihkehe because: Typo



posted on Jan, 30 2020 @ 11:57 PM
link   

originally posted by: Ksihkehe

originally posted by: RalagaNarHallas
a reply to: Metallicus

So as i am not DNA smart but does any one know if dna from a semen stain could even still be tested from that far back ,let alone the hurdles of actually proving it was non consensual ,but hey she could always go with it being indelible in her hippocampus and mention putting in extra doors that seemed to work last time


It's not even semen. It's "touch" DNA. Essentially trace skin cells. It's of debatable reliability, it means nothing. They're asking for it because they KNOW that he'll refuse. Then they claim refusal is guilt and she sells more books.


An accusation is all Pelosi will need in order to have her buddy Schiff launch an impeachment inquiry.



posted on Jan, 31 2020 @ 12:09 AM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen

Now she has set the latest Democrat emphasis as: "You Don't Have a Trial If You Don't Have Witnesses" 😆😆



This is not a court of law...it is a court of congress, big differences. If it was a court of law Trump would never have been impeached. To her argument: You don't have an impeachment unless it is bipartisan... period. Enough said...



posted on Jan, 31 2020 @ 12:13 AM
link   
a reply to: Ksihkehe

well dons tinfoil hat of massive proportions, stormy daniles claimed to have his dna on a blue dress and a playboy playmate said she saved some of his "as a keepsake" or something www.kgw.com...

www.yahoo.com... and this

if its touch dna vs semen then it would be even easier to fake so who knows no dobut they are trying to parallel clintons dress issue ,so if this isnt one of the new avenues of attack on president trump id be some what suprised what with the meetoo movement mostly petering out but still in peoples minds .

i find it HIGHLY odd from the link i shared that the woman would wear the dress again after keeping it for so long if she was raped like she claims
www.wfsb.com... RECHa6pOJTQ81fX0H9Yk3VVgcbgVcuq_to

n a New York magazine piece in June and a book published the next month, Carroll said she and Trump met by chance, chatted and went to the lingerie department for Trump to pick out a gift for an unidentified woman. She said joking banter about trying on a bodysuit ended in a dressing room, where she said Trump pinned her against the wall by her arms, reached under the dress, pulled down her tights and raped her as she tried to fight him off, eventually escaping. “The Donna Karan coatdress still hangs on the back of my closet door, unworn and unlaundered since that evening,” she wrote. She donned it for a photo accompanying the magazine piece.
why on earth if you were raped would you ever put on the garmet again especially after so much time and risk contaminating it by wearing it to frigging photo shoot



posted on Jan, 31 2020 @ 12:22 AM
link   

originally posted by: RalagaNarHallas
so as i am not DNA smart but does any one know if dna from a semen stain could even still be tested from that far back ,let alone the hurdles of actually proving it was non consensual ,but hey she could always go with it being indelible in her hippocampus and mention putting in extra doors that seemed to work last time


I am DNA smart and you can get DNA from a piece of poo 15,000 years old or a ear bone 50,000 years old...lol

A semen stain just means there was some sexual interactions, doesn't mean rape....It is hard to tell today as #metoo started as something good but has since been weaponized and people will come out of the woodwork to take advantage of it.

To be honest I'm not sure how bad even old Weinstein really is. Yes he used his power for sex, BUT women tend to also use sex for power, so there is definitely a yin yang thing there. It is really hard for me to believe that some woman went to old Harvey's house just the two of them and didn't think sex was going to be a part of it. Maybe I'm cynical, but I can't remember in my youth of ever bringing a woman home to sleep with me where sex was not part of the reason.

As a side note I didn't bring virgin nuns home, and I bet neither did Harvey...lol




edit on 31-1-2020 by Xtrozero because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 31 2020 @ 12:27 AM
link   

originally posted by: RalagaNarHallas
a reply to: Ksihkehe

well dons tinfoil hat of massive proportions, stormy daniles claimed to have his dna on a blue dress and a playboy playmate said she saved some of his "as a keepsake" or something



Was stormy some bucket list for a billionaire, most likely... but there is proof she was raped 1000 times and filmed...just saying...



posted on Jan, 31 2020 @ 12:34 AM
link   
That video of Speaker Pelosi is hysterical, she looks like she was on an all night pill poppin' vodka drinking bender and put the wrong set of teeth in her mouth.
Her look in that video is too funny.


originally posted by: xuenchen
Frau Sprecherin Nancy Pelosi in her press conference made some wild statements as usual !!

Now she has set the latest Democrat emphasis as: "You Don't Have a Trial If You Don't Have Witnesses" 😆😆

She's setting up the excuses for failure because we could see the acquittal itself Friday !! 😀

The "Punchline" is in bold ...... 😎


Pelosi: Trump ‘Will Not Be Acquitted’ Because 'You Don't Have a Trial If You Don't Have Witnesses'

Flanked by a poster -- the "Moving Forward Framework For the People" -- House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) on Thursday opened her news conference by indicating that Democrats are moving beyond impeachment and the all-but-certain acquittal of the president.

Yet Pelosi insisted there can be no acquittal -- even if the Senate votes to acquit President Donald Trump, as looks likely.

“We are right now prayerful and hopeful that the Senate will have the courage to hear the truth about the president's actions," Pelosi said.

A reporter asked her, "When this is over, do you think that President Trump will be chastened and understand that he’s got a Congress watching him? Or will he be emboldened because the Senate will have acquitted him?"

"Well, he will not be acquitted," she said – even if he is:





posted on Jan, 31 2020 @ 01:10 AM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

Interesting fact: in Italian the term Pelosi refers to a Dingbat.



posted on Jan, 31 2020 @ 01:21 AM
link   
a reply to: Xtrozero

are you implying that willingly participating in pornography is rape now? because oddly enough its one of the few industries women make 5x the amount of men pay wise ,now if you mentioned fay reagan i may have believed you as she had a drug problem for her last few years and does not remember her last 100 or so videos



posted on Jan, 31 2020 @ 01:49 AM
link   
a reply to: Stupidsecrets

totally right i watched the lot the wife called me a daft old git for watching i actually had a good laugh the prez men were very good



posted on Jan, 31 2020 @ 01:51 AM
link   

originally posted by: RalagaNarHallas
a reply to: Xtrozero

are you implying that willingly participating in pornography is rape now? because oddly enough its one of the few industries women make 5x the amount of men pay wise ,now if you mentioned fay reagan i may have believed you as she had a drug problem for her last few years and does not remember her last 100 or so videos


Goodness. You know a bit more about the subject you are talking about than fits polite society.
Regardless it is not (I hope) in any regard to the topic at hand, which is politics and not porn stars.



posted on Jan, 31 2020 @ 03:23 AM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

She should be drug tested immediately. She is clearly on a bender.



posted on Jan, 31 2020 @ 04:18 AM
link   
Did y'all see the dislike ratio of that CSpan Youtube clip?

The culmination of their entire plan to unseat the POTUS has finally come down to Endgame.

Taking a step back and looking at Pelosis, I can see why this master politician failed, this is a different era, another time, she is out of her element and beyond reproach.

The moment McConnell wouldn't budge on the Articles was the moment her bid failed, she couldn't recover.

Thus now, we are seeing the result.



posted on Jan, 31 2020 @ 05:35 AM
link   

A reporter asked her, "When this is over, do you think that President Trump will be chastened and understand that he’s got a Congress watching him?


What a dumb reporter. If Trump doesn't know he's got Congress "watching him", after three of failed impeachment attempts, than he will never get the message.... I'll just assume he knows and simply doesn't care if they are "watching him".



posted on Jan, 31 2020 @ 05:45 AM
link   
a reply to: loam
Midterms and nearly every special election has gone to the left.
If he somehow magically does get re-elected the then Democrat house AND Senate will impeach him again and he can hold that record too. First to be impeached twice.

There is no scenario where he becomes the darling of America. He's a rat.



new topics

top topics



 
44
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join