It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Patriot Act Redux?

page: 1

log in


posted on Jan, 29 2020 @ 02:34 PM
Not exactly, well maybe. Hmm.. To be honest, this actually baffles me so much so that I really don't know what the end game is here. What exactly are we seeing here? Government had a change of heart? This is weird to say the least.

Bipartisan legislation could curtail long-running National Security Agency data collection efforts.

A bipartisan cadre of lawmakers in the House and Senate have introduced legislation that would reform the 9/11-era authorities used by the intelligence community to access Americans’ phone records and other domestic communications.

The Safeguarding Americans’ Private Records Act would narrow Section 215 of the Patriot Act, which provided the National Security Agency and sister intelligence agencies sweeping information-gathering authorities following the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001. According to lawmakers, the bill would end the phone surveillance program that would ensnare Americans’ phone records and prohibit the warrantless collection of location data. The bill would reform the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, adding transparency to secretive court processes that decide whether to surveil individuals.

While previous presidential administrations and Congresses have continually renewed the authorities, privacy advocates have voiced increasing opposition to the authorities, which allow for records and data to be vacuumed up without a warrant. The program was first exposed by former intelligence contractor Edward Snowden.

So the best I can tell is... Someone is trying to score some brownie points but why with surveillance? Did they just wake up one day and realised that they were going against our right to privacy and decided to fix the problem that they created for the benefit of the american people? But why this specifically?

It's bipartisan so looks like both sides are pushing this along.

In a statement, Sen. Ron Wyden, D, Ore., said the bill “preserves authorities the government uses against criminals and terrorists, while putting Americans’ constitutional rights front and center.” A companion bill has been introduced in the House, led by Reps. Zoe Lofgren, D-Calif., Pramila Jayapal, D-Wash., and Warren Davidson, R-Ohio.

In recent years, the NSA ran into technical challenges handling and storing the data it is authorized to collect through its Call Detail Record program. Last April, NSA officials reportedly asked the White House to abandon the program, citing logistical and legal challenges outweighed its potential benefits.

I'm still scratching my head over this.

But wait... It gets more weird:

Department of Interior grounding drone fleet over cybersecurity concerns

Ok, so this kinda makes more sense to me. They don't want other countries hacking drones to spy on us while we spy on us.

The secretary of the Interior issued an order Wednesday grounding all of the Department of the Interior’s non-emergency drones so the agency can assess potential cybersecurity concerns before operating the devices any further.

“Drones for non-emergency operations will remain grounded while the Interior Department reviews the possibility of potential threats and ensures a secure, reliable and consistent drone policy that advances our mission while keeping America safe,” a Department of Interior (DOI) spokesperson said.

It's ok. False alarm. It's only temporary.

The order, which will be temporary, “is intended to better ensure the cybersecurity and supply of American technology of unmanned aircraft systems,” according to the order. Part of the DOI’s concern is that information on American energy, transportation, and defense infrastructure collected by DOI drones “has the potential to be valuable to foreign entities, organizations, and governments,” the order says.

Those pesky chinese are at it again!

While DOI grounded a fleet of approximately 800 Chinese-made drones last October, this order is intended to formalize and expand that grounding, a senior Interior official told reporters on a call Wednesday.

The order comes amid a spate of warnings and bans at multiple government agencies, including the Department of Defense, about possible vulnerabilities in Chinese-made drone systems that could be allowing Beijing to conduct espionage. The Army banned the use of Chinese-made DJI drones three years ago following warnings from the Navy about “highly vulnerable” drone systems.

One memo drafted by the Navy & Marine Corps Small Tactical Unmanned Aircraft Systems Program Manager has warned “images, video and flight records could be uploaded to unsecured servers in other countries via live streaming.” The Navy has also warned adversaries may view video and metadata from drone systems even though the air vehicle is encrypted. The Department of Homeland Security previously warned the private sector their data may be pilfered off if they use commercial drone systems made in China.

Now I get it and it makes sense. What I don't understand is, why isn't there a way to exclude steaming from the internet? Is this something that somehow miraculously impossible?

Still, the first part of this makes me question their motives. I get that they don't want their goods on us to fall in the hands of china but that probably wouldn't have anything to do with what the DHS has been doing.

Strange days indeed.

posted on Jan, 29 2020 @ 02:57 PM
a reply to: StallionDuck

But James Comey told me "expectation of privacy" is no longer valid?!

Bah nvm

1-2020 by BlueJacket because: (no reason given)

edit on 29-1-2020 by BlueJacket because: lol

new topics

log in