It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Steveogold
a reply to: Admitted
i think if you hang on a bit you will get your witnesses
originally posted by: Admitted
originally posted by: burntheships
originally posted by: Admitted
I want the whole truth. I want firsthand witnesses.
You had them already.
Like an election, you can't stop the process because
you do not like the results.
No. I haven't. No firsthand witnesses. No Bolton, Pompeo, Trump himself, Mulvaney.
Not one. The senate can provide that. The house should have.
originally posted by: Admitted
I give up.
10 pages.
I can't respond to it all. I don't have the time or energy.
We have a trial without witnesses. I want to know the truth.
Call Bolton. Call Biden. Call everyone.
But no witnesses?
All of our government is a joke. Yes all. House, Senate, and Trump.
And the whole world is seeing it.
...
I apologize for not responding individually there are too many posts.
originally posted by: Admitted
a reply to: ketsuko
Agreed. It was done wrong.
Thing is...we have a Trial Without Witnesses and it is bogus.
If anyone on the Senate wants to believe themselves doing right and just passing this off...they are criminal. They are not fulfilling their oath.
I stand by thread title (it's my only voice, really). We have a trial without witnesses.
And that is bogus. We have a president on trial and we don't choose to hear any reason why.
originally posted by: Admitted
a reply to: ketsuko
Agreed. It was done wrong.
Thing is...we have a Trial Without Witnesses and it is bogus.
If anyone on the Senate wants to believe themselves doing right and just passing this off...they are criminal. They are not fulfilling their oath.
I stand by thread title (it's my only voice, really). We have a trial without witnesses.
And that is bogus. We have a president on trial and we don't choose to hear any reason why.
originally posted by: SonOfTheLawOfOne
originally posted by: Admitted
originally posted by: burntheships
originally posted by: Admitted
I want the whole truth. I want firsthand witnesses.
You had them already.
Like an election, you can't stop the process because
you do not like the results.
No. I haven't. No firsthand witnesses. No Bolton, Pompeo, Trump himself, Mulvaney.
Not one. The senate can provide that. The house should have.
But they didn't and that's their job.
You keep screaming about witnesses... the House had 17 OF THEM! The President had NONE. It was a mistrial from the start. That is what you don't understand.
With the 17 witnesses testimony, there has been nothing that incriminates the President or warrants the Senate to step outside the sphere of responsibility in an impeachment trial to finish the House investigation on the fly.
~Namaste
originally posted by: Steveogold
a reply to: Admitted
hahahaha i love your staying power
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: Admitted
How many times do courts toss out cases because there is no point in continuing? Those are often trials without witnesses too.
If you have a problem with it, be angry at the House for not bothering to do the job correctly. If they effed it up, that isn't the Senate's problem to fix. The Senate goes on the merits of the case given them, they don't create a new case out of whole cloth.
If the Democrats are so incompetent they cannot come up with a credible case, it's not the Republicans' job to do it for them.