UK vs. US...Lets Get Ready to Rumble!

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

Id personally like the catherine wheel first, break all his limbs and bones with a hammer

then the pear of despair in his orifices

then the rack

then leave him on walls of Windsor castle or tower bridge for a couple weeks so the crows can peck out his eyes

let him suffer in a cage naked for a few weeks , starving him and letting the public throw waste at him
then pull out all oh his finger nails and toenails

then feign a rescue attempt , only to put him into even more horrible situations

I think public shame would be the best thing for these bastards

put them in the stocks and let them rot

a reply to: lakenheath24


Has the FBI indicated that they want to talk to Prince Andrew?
If they do, I would think they would go to him to avoid unnecessary public scandal. Extradition usually implies there is an arrest warrant not merely a need for questioning.
Unless they plan to arrest him they won't initiate an extradition. I

About the motorist from the U.S., was she drunk driving? I guess that can't be known if it was a hit and run. Usually if someone runs from an accident it is because they are intoxicated in some way. Or they were someplace they should not have been.

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

Just after the watershed, and it might justify the exuberant license fee.

a reply to: andy06shake

hmmm would this make me consider the license fee , seeing criminals being tortured or debased

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

I wonder if this had anything to do with why Fergie divorced him? Surely his own daughters would have been safe right?
Things that make you go hmmmmm.

a reply to: lakenheath24

That implies the lady hit him on purpose. You don't think that do you?

Whatever Andrew did, he chose to do.

a reply to: bastion

I work for a utility serving about 2 million people and we are about to trial 5G. Had the hardware installed in the office the other day and it's Nokia equipment.

a reply to: Freeborn

I agree. Did the UK issue an extradition on her? If so she should appear.
She should never have left in the first place.
It certainly makes her look guilty.

a reply to: sapien82

There are still some ordinary decent criminals out there doing the rounds, take the pensioners who refuse to be extorted via the spurious license fee for instance.

As to seeing people being tortured or debased, BBC shows that every day on the NEWS, there are your real criminals right there, nevermind pedo supporting/enabling scum ta boot.

a reply to: andy06shake

Aye ye forget that we see this daily on tv

a reply to: Sillyolme

Was she checked for alcohol or drug use on the scene?

I don't imagine people with diplomatic immunity are.

She could have been high as a kite when she hit that kid/young man, never going to know now through.

Diplomatic immunity my arse.

She waa interviewed by police at the scene. she passed a sobriety check. Its damned easy to pull out on the wrong side of the road here....especially as she was new. And she didnt run per se. She was advised to lea e asap by the state dept.


a reply to: Sillyolme

Move to Saudi....its like watchin wrestling for them.


a reply to: sapien82

No...ergo the emoji to indicate snarkiness.

a reply to: Sillyolme

Not 100 percent sure, but swear i read she passed sobriety test. Otherwise she would have been arrested kn the spot.

Here is a timeline...
www.telegraph.co.uk...



a reply to: andy06shake

a reply to: lakenheath24

If she had taken a breath test im sure there would be data/evidence of such.

She probably was asked to do a physical test, for example, walk in a straight line then turn around and walk back.

Hardly conclusive all the same, especially given the fact that she departed on the first military flight back to the USA.

She should have been treated like any other person involved in a traffic accident where fatalities are concerned.

And if she was then thats fine, but it looks a bit dodgy if she was not if you ask me.

Not good.optics.for sure.



a reply to: andy06shake

a reply to: sapien82

I like the way you think. Have you ever thought about joining the Masons? Your talents would come in handy for the end times.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

I wonder if this had anything to do with why Fergie divorced him? Surely his own daughters would have been safe right?
Things that make you go hmmmmm.

I highly doubt it, seeing as she has spent the last 20 years trying to get back with him!

originally posted by: lakenheath24
Thaf sounds wonderful and all, but what about this....

a reply to: bastion

www.bbc.co.uk...


I would not claim anything to be safe. The germans were positive enigma was unbreakable as well.

Agreed nothing is 100% secure (new branches of maths may defeat current UK infrastructure). Vigilance is essential to security. It's been a complete accident that the design of UK internet/telecoms is ring fenced/secured and one of the only projects the government/intel got right. The rest of national security is so bad it's shocking (blueprints of number 10, miliitary oil pipelines, NHS gas/power supply, OS maps pre 1972 that reveal the location of all secret UK bases are all public domain/stocked in reference libraries.

It's a great BBC article but also gives passing reference to the 'secret' blackbox system and monitoring I mentioned earlier (NCA and BAE detected/cracked it as they use/have access to the copy of the public internet. It was installed in either 2003 or 2005 IIRC, with the government and various utility companies claiming it was to repair/update gas pipelines.

I had no idea Price Waterhouse Cooper had access to this data, that's really intriguing info and I can't fathom why they would be granted thus ability from the Home Office and Home Secretary or what year that occurred - reeks of corruption and brown envelopes, will do some sleuthing to try and work out the origin.

Normal firms aren't covered/given access to the higher level intranets/closed systems that are used for core infrastructure - most are still using windows XP or similar unmatched, outdated Windows systems that are open ad have repeatedly been hacked by amateurs/individuals - i.e doesn't require nation state level sophistication to close it down such as the WannaCry Episode.

There is always the problem of bad security vetting/social engineering - for example when I was working at BAE Salmesbury, the head IT guy for Eurofighter front seat amalgamation department was openly selling porn and eventually found to be a paedophile/offering child porn for sale. The company chose to fire him and refused to report him to the police as they were too worried about reputation/an open paedo passing high level vetting than public safety.