It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Pam Bondi Lays Out Case Against Joe Biden, Hunter Biden, Burisma
Former Florida attorney general Pam Bondi made the White House’s case to the Senate on Monday afternoon that President Donald Trump had good reason to ask Ukraine to investigate the conflict of interest involving former Vice President Joe Biden; his son Hunter Biden; and the corrupt Ukraine gas company, Burisma.
Using clips of testimony from Democrats’ own witnesses, and reports from the mainstream media — including an ABC News interview with Hunter Biden — Bondi argued that Hunter Biden was paid handsomely for little reason other than that he was the vice president’s son. The company was under investigation at the time — and Vice President Biden later famously insisted the prosecutor be fired.
She also noted that Hunter Biden was involved in business with Chris Heinz, the stepson of then-Secretary of State John Kerry. Both were involved in Ukraine — and elsewhere — at a time when ending corruption was said to be the top priority of the United States and other western governments in dealing with Ukraine.
Pam Bondi, the former attorney general of Florida who is a member of the Trump impeachment legal team, outlined on Jan. 27 the concerns she said the president had about potential corruption on the part of the Bidens in Ukraine. Bondi pointed to numerous news reports raising questions about Hunter Biden’s appointment to the board of Ukrainian energy company Burisma. The move “looks nepotistic at best, nefarious at worst,” Bondi said, speaking on the Senate floor during the impeachment trial. While some ethics experts have said Hunter Biden’s seat on the Burisma board could raise the appearance of a conflict of interest, independent news reports have found no wrongdoing by Hunter Biden or former vice president Joe Biden. Democrats argue Trump used the idea of corruption as a cover for efforts to get Ukraine to investigate his political rival. Trump’s defense team is presenting their arguments as part of the Senate impeachment trial. The trial has entered a pivotal week as his defense team resumes its case and senators face a critical vote on whether to hear witnesses or proceed directly to a vote that is widely expected to end in his acquittal. The articles of impeachment charge Trump with abuse of power and obstruction of Congress. The House of Representatives impeached the president in December on those two counts.
Pam Bondi courtesy PBS Newshour
originally posted by: xuenchen
Former Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi is currently one of the Trump Defense Team.
She is an accomplished attorney and is on the hunt for the Bidens !!
originally posted by: JinMI
The bidens, no matter how innocent or guilty, aren't on trial.
Dismantle the impeachment farce then move onto the bidens as the election draws nearer.
originally posted by: ColeYounger
I had no clue what a total crook Biden was until I heard Rudy Guiliani's podcast. Joe and Hunter Biden have amassed millions and millions of ill-gotten dollars. This stuff needs to get out to the public asap.
I believe every word Guiliani said.
originally posted by: vethumanbeing
originally posted by: ColeYounger
I had no clue what a total crook Biden was until I heard Rudy Guiliani's podcast. Joe and Hunter Biden have amassed millions and millions of ill-gotten dollars. This stuff needs to get out to the public asap.
I believe every word Guiliani said.
Everything Guiliani says about Biden (crony capitalistic/nepotism corruption) is backed up by Peter Schweizer. His new book 'Profiles In Corruption' details many get rich scheme opportunities Joe provided his brothers, sons, and in laws.
originally posted by: yuppa
a reply to: visitedbythem
I been hearing alot of people saying bondi is corrupt and dropped the case against Trump U,but most people do not realize that the case was dropped because of a SETTLEMENT she knew was coming down the pike before it was dropped.
originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: fringeofthefringe
Deflection and pointing fingers aren't a good defense strategy. About as good as the current articles of impeachment.
originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: fringeofthefringe
Deflection and pointing fingers aren't a good defense strategy. About as good as the current articles of impeachment.
originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: fringeofthefringe
Sure the investigation would be relevant.
However what would it have to do with the impeachment?
The relevant information should already be in the proper hands.