It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Trump is genius, and Schiff proved it.

page: 5
49
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 24 2020 @ 03:43 PM
link   

originally posted by: dfnj2015
I thought it was because he broke federal election laws, obstruction of justice, and his oath of office with the quid pro quo with the Ukraine.

You thought wrong, because he didn't do any of those things, it is just wishful thinking on the part of the demwits.




posted on Jan, 24 2020 @ 03:45 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
Maybe not. But the Founding Fathers could, and that's why they added impeachment for high crimes and misdemeanors to Constitution, as a remedy for a president who would use foreign entanglements to undermine the integrity of our elections.

So... wake me up when that happens...



posted on Jan, 24 2020 @ 03:49 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: network dude
The Articles of impeachment include 2 high crimes, obstruction of Congress

According to the demwits, Separation of Powers = Obstruction of Congress


and abuse of power.

According to demwits, President doing something some Congresscritters don't like = Abuse of Power.

Both of these beliefs are fallacies that have destroyed the demwit party - thank god.


Did Bill Clinton commit a high crime or misdemeanor?

Is perjury a crime?



posted on Jan, 24 2020 @ 03:51 PM
link   

originally posted by: network dude
And my answer is no. You can re-read what I wrote and try to extrapolate why you should have already known that.

I disagree. Perjury absolutely ranks higher than anything in the category of 'misdemeanor', so yes, it does.

Does that mean it is an impeachable offense? Only Congress can make that determination - and, oh, yeah, they did.



posted on Jan, 24 2020 @ 03:55 PM
link   
a reply to: tanstaafl




Is perjury a crime?


Is violating the Impound Control Act a violation of the law and the oath to uphold the law that the President took when he was inaugurated?

Is soliciting a foreign agent for election aid a federal crime?



posted on Jan, 24 2020 @ 04:07 PM
link   
a reply to: MarioOnTheFly

And it will be led by the great Leroy Jenkins...

Jaden



posted on Jan, 24 2020 @ 04:30 PM
link   
I still think Schiff is a poor measuring stick for genius.

Kinda like using micrometers to determine snow depth from a blizzard...just to throw out a reference to the 42nd anniversary to the Blizzard of 78 this weekend.



posted on Jan, 24 2020 @ 04:52 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: tanstaafl




Is perjury a crime?


Is violating the Impound Control Act a violation of the law and the oath to uphold the law that the President took when he was inaugurated?

Is soliciting a foreign agent for election aid a federal crime?




1.No, that law applies to domestic funding.
US Foreign policy is the President's purview and military aid ie. military decisions fall under the Commander in Chief as laid out in the Constitution.

2. Ask Clinton that question
But if you mean is investigating corruption committed by the previous Administration the duty of the President? Then yes. Also, it's in accordance with the Anti-Corruption treaty we have with Ukraine.


Don't you get tired of being wrong?



posted on Jan, 24 2020 @ 04:54 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: tanstaafl




Is perjury a crime?


Is violating the Impound Control Act a violation of the law and the oath to uphold the law that the President took when he was inaugurated?

Is soliciting a foreign agent for election aid a federal crime?




what is the penalty for such an action?



posted on Jan, 24 2020 @ 05:03 PM
link   
a reply to: watchitburn




No, that law applies to domestic funding.


The President is charged with upholding the law, all laws. To violate, ignore, claim to above the law, or to defy the law, are all examples of violation of his oath, and of the duties of his office.



posted on Jan, 24 2020 @ 05:30 PM
link   
a reply to: Sookiechacha

Now you're just talking yourself in circles. But whatever helps you sleep at night comrad.



posted on Jan, 24 2020 @ 05:47 PM
link   
debunked here
a reply to: [post=24892145]okrian[/lot

debunked here as well

here as well
oops is the another one


edit on 24-1-2020 by CrazyFox because: Added for clarity



posted on Jan, 24 2020 @ 06:06 PM
link   
a reply to: CrazyFox

Three million DEAD people were removed from voter roles this last week.

I wonder why leftists and dEmocrats are upset about that?

The meaningless ‘popular vote’ was definitely President Trump’s in 2016, and this November it will most likely be the biggest victory in United States history.

Hence the desperation and lies



posted on Jan, 24 2020 @ 06:12 PM
link   

originally posted by: dfnj2015

originally posted by: network dude
Adam Schiff told the world that Trump will steal the 2020 elections, and that is why he must be removed.


I thought it was because he broke federal election laws, obstruction of justice, and his oath of office with the quid pro quo with the Ukraine.



Well bless your heart.


Those statements have been proven wrong over and over and over here, yet you keep repeating them. That's ok, you just keep repeating your fantasy but just know that everyone else knows better.



posted on Jan, 24 2020 @ 06:25 PM
link   
you forgot the N that goes after O

a reply to: Breakthestreak


edit on 24-1-2020 by CrazyFox because: Spell check is irritating



posted on Jan, 24 2020 @ 07:33 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

What transcipt? You mean the non verbatim document realeased that clearly states 'not a transcript'?

Maybe youve got access to documents noone else haas seen yet?



posted on Jan, 24 2020 @ 07:40 PM
link   

originally posted by: sunkuong
a reply to: xuenchen

What transcipt? You mean the non verbatim document realeased that clearly states 'not a transcript'?

Maybe youve got access to documents noone else haas seen yet?


Didn't both fact witnesses under oath in the Houses' investigation already state it was accurate?

I might have "mandela'ed" that...

edit on 24-1-2020 by CrawlingChaos because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 24 2020 @ 07:46 PM
link   
a reply to: CrawlingChaos

The house had witnesses under oath state that?

Cant seem to find a transcript of that either.

Maybe you have been mandela'ed
edit on 24-1-2020 by sunkuong because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 24 2020 @ 08:02 PM
link   
a reply to: network dude

The White House lays the groundwork for publicly exposing Adam Schiff during the impeachment trial.

mobile.twitter.com...



posted on Jan, 24 2020 @ 08:46 PM
link   

originally posted by: sunkuong
a reply to: xuenchen

What transcipt? You mean the non verbatim document realeased that clearly states 'not a transcript'?

Maybe youve got access to documents noone else haas seen yet?


As suspected and verified....no election help requested !!! 😁




new topics

top topics



 
49
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join