It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
What percent of DNA is different between a Caucasian and an Asian?
-An elementary school student from California
November 24, 2008
There isn't much genetic difference between Asians and Caucasians. In fact, at the DNA level, two Asians are often more different than an Asian and a Caucasian person.
But how can this be when the two groups look so different? It's because those differences are only skin deep. And they don't need much DNA to happen.
Most of our DNA has nothing to do with how we look. It's used to make our hearts, livers, spleens, and other organs. It tells us how tall we will be or tells our body to grow two arms, two legs, and hair on the top of our heads. It makes sure that our eyes are at the top of our faces, our noses are in the middle and our mouths are on the bottom.
All these things can be somewhat different between people. And many of these differences come from having slightly different DNA.
For example, my DNA might make my nose a different shape from yours. Or your DNA might tell you to grow taller than me.
But most of these characteristics have nothing to do with whether or not someone is Asian or Caucasian. They have more to do with differences found between any two people. What this means is that most DNA differences are not specific to any ethnic group.
There's only a small part of DNA that's involved in specific differences between Asians and Caucasians. Things like eye shape and color, skin color and hair texture take only the tiniest fraction of our DNA.
This is swamped out by the differences within individuals. We are all more similar than we are different. And a tall Asian might actually be more similar genetically to a tall Caucasian person then he is to a short Asian person.
originally posted by: khnum
Now this is interesting
hmmm reminds me of
The Chinese communist party would think nothing of killing countless numbers of folks if it suited its objectives,what if,what if they were introducing weaponised 5g and passing it off as the flu,just a thought.
If the telecommunications industry's plan for 5G come to fruition, no person, no animal, no bird, no insect and no plant on Earth will be able to avoid exposure, 24 hours a day, 365 days a year, to levels of RF radiation that are tens to hundreds of times greater than what exists today, without any possibility of escape anywhere on the planet.
originally posted by: khnum
a reply to: jedi_hamster
No it does not have a long range but they lit up 84000 transmitters in 50 cities on 31 October 2019,lighten up this is a conspiracy website where we explore all possibilities or has deny ignorance become deny everything here
originally posted by: khnum
a reply to: jedi_hamster
60ghz Chinese 5g
60ghz the frequency for human oxygen absorption
victims are showing oxygen absorption rates of 40-50 per cent.
I think its relevant
and if you dont I dont care
A day after the second coronavirus case was confirmed in Kerala, the novel virus has hit another patient in the state, on Monday (February 3).
Another Keralite student who returned from Wuhan University on Monday tested positive for the infection, Health Minister KK Shailaja said here.
originally posted by: beyondknowledge
a reply to: khnum
I see your confusion on this. I looked into it and you are concerned about the oxygen absorption at 60 ghz. This has nothing to do with humans and is about the absorption of energy at this frequency by oxygen in the atmosphere.
This absorption makes the signals only able to travel a short range in air and has less interference from other devices in the same band. As this band is not able to penetrate the human body to any amount past the surface of the skin, I don’t see how warming up some nearby oxygen atoms in the air has to do with this possible pandemic.
originally posted by: Oleman
a reply to: jedi_hamster
I hate to add to the noise, but as a former satellite uplink safety officer, and as someone who did extensive research on the problems of 60Hz magnetic fields interfering in DNA-RNA transcription, I can tell you with total confidence that 5G cell phones are not dangerous, unless maybe you hold the transmitter up to a hole in your head! And then, the older lower frequencies of 2G, 3G and 4G are way more of a threat to you. I would worry much more about electric blankets and florescent light ballasts.
originally posted by: khnum
a reply to: beyondknowledge
Fair enough then why are people dropping dead in China and not elsewhere sort of like this
disp.cc...