It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Bicent
I am not watching or following it I am busy working. It just appears to me to be a distraction. Trump, is not a good ole boy politician that is why he gets stuff done. Not being part of the clique, they are prejudice towards you. So here we have the impeachment.
originally posted by: DontTreadOnMe
This is NOT the Mud Pit!!!
All rules for polite political debate will be enforced.
Reaffirming Our Desire For Productive Political Debate (REVISED)
Please read new threads.
No Political Trolling.....either in words or images.
Is There Civilization Without Civility
You are responsible for your own posts.....those who ignore that responsibility will face mod actions.
and, as always:
Do NOT reply to this post!!
originally posted by: xuenchen
The "Prosecution" is showing how well versed they are on all the House hearings that produced a 100% mix of innuendo, lies, speculation, 2nd hand testimony, 3rd hand testimony, Shakespeare style acting along with total jive turkey talk 🥳 🦚
originally posted by: smurfy
a reply to: SonOfTheLawOfOne
It's about the withholding of any corroborative, material evidence by the White House regime, at the behest of the President himself.
inculpatory evidence is a tendency of guilt, and a prosecuting party should show any such evidence...if they have it
In this case, it is Trump himself who was able to withhold such evidence by the power of his position.
The case is tight, but his withholding of such corroborative material evidence, which is known to exist deprives the prosecution of something that should have been given in the first instance.
House impeachment manager Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) tried to dismiss Harvard Law School professor emeritus Alan Dershowitz as not a “reputable constitutional law expert.”
Schiff did not respond directly to the White House argument that “abuse of power” was not an impeachable offense according to the U.S. Constitution. Instead, he targeted Dershowitz, whom he said was responsible for that argument.
House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff (D-CA) said during a press conference Tuesday that the evidence is already “overwhelming” that President Trump abused the power of his office and obstructed Congress but argued that the Senate should allow House Democrats to introduce more evidence.
CLAIM: President Donald Trump believes that he has absolute power under Article II of the U.S. Constitution and must therefore be impeached.
VERDICT: False. Trump was talking specifically about the power to fire Robert Mueller.
The House impeachment managers — all Democrats — argued Tuesday at the start of Trump’s impeachment trial in the Senate that Trump believed that Article II of the Constitution meant he can do “whatever I want.” Both Reps. Adam Schiff (D-CA) and Zoe Lofgren (D-CA) presented deceptively edited video that cur out the context of Trump’s words.
originally posted by: DanDanDat
Democrats: "We have overwhelmingly evidence and it clearly shows the president is guilty and more dangerous than any other president ever... if any one of you doesn't vote in our favor with the overwhelmingly evidence we have than you are not only part of the coverup but will forever damage our country... we would like you to gather more evidence"