It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Can someone tell me why President Trump should be thrown out of office

page: 10
28
<< 7  8  9    11  12  13 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 21 2020 @ 12:37 PM
link   

originally posted by: cognizant420
a reply to: dfnj2015

Did you know it's not possible for a president to be held in contempt of Congress, but that's one of the things he was impeached for.


The Office of Legal Counsel has asserted that thePresident of the United States is protected from contempt by executive privilege.





Clinton got impeached for lying to Congress. Failing to follow the divisions of governmental powers as laid out in the constitution is indeed an impeachable offense.constitution




posted on Jan, 21 2020 @ 12:47 PM
link   

originally posted by: JoseGarcia

originally posted by: chr0naut
Ooohh a diplomat and politician. We can't have that.


Actually--we CAN'T AFFORD ANY MORE SUCH TREASON working so hard to destroy the USA to ashes as agents of the Marxist globalist oligarchy that trumped up all these farcical impeachment idiocies.

The Bushes, Clintons, et al for decades have worked hard toward destroying the USA to enable quicker & easier set-up of the Marxist globalist tyrannical NWO gulag, death camps & genocidal depopulation down to 500 million globally.

HRC was assigned the 8 years after O'B . . . 1st 4 years to shred the Bill of rights--particularly 1st & 2nd amendments 2nd 4 years to literally start WW3 to totally destroy the USA to ashes.

BY GOD'S GRACE, TRUMP STOPPED THAT PLAN.

Are you suggesting that the current Vice President of the US, becoming the President of the US when that job is vacated, is treason?

I would actually see that as political continuity.

Trump is no messiah.

He got there because his campaign smeared the other side like no previous President and because of the sudden prevalence of unmoderated and unverified social media advertisements and posts. So politicians went from being just politicians to murderer, drug addicted, pedophile, satanists, almost overnight.


edit on 21/1/2020 by chr0naut because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 21 2020 @ 12:56 PM
link   


He got there because his campaign smeared the other side like no previous President and because of the sudden prevalence of unmoderated and unverified social media advertisements and posts. So politicians went from being just politicians to murderer, drug addicted, pedophile, satanists, almost overnight.
a reply to: chr0naut
nope
he just got more votes

she is a hag
she continues to be a hag



posted on Jan, 21 2020 @ 12:56 PM
link   
I'm a bit out of the loop because I lost interest once Trump was impeached but I was under the impression that during this senate trial the senators would look at the evidence and case built by the democrats in the house and vote on Trump's removal based on that. Right?

If yes, why is Schiff saying that more evidence and witnesses is needed?

If no, what did I misunderstand about this process?

Is the senate supposed to gather more evidence and witnesses? If yes, how could the president be impeached when the investigation hasn't been completed yet?



posted on Jan, 21 2020 @ 03:38 PM
link   

originally posted by: shooterbrody



He got there because his campaign smeared the other side like no previous President and because of the sudden prevalence of unmoderated and unverified social media advertisements and posts. So politicians went from being just politicians to murderer, drug addicted, pedophile, satanists, almost overnight.
a reply to: chr0naut
nope
he just got more votes

she is a hag
she continues to be a hag


Trump also didn't get more of the popular votes.

But hey, Hillary was bad, eh, am I right, am I right...




edit on 21/1/2020 by chr0naut because: You see, smear and muck rake...



posted on Jan, 21 2020 @ 03:39 PM
link   
The term “popular vote” will never escape a leftists lips ever again after this November

A landslide is an absolute certainty


The best part is, every single one of them knows it.



posted on Jan, 21 2020 @ 03:42 PM
link   
a reply to: musicismagic

I can't believe what's being proposed.

Keeping the evidence out, no witnesses, full control of the cameras???!!!

Joseph Goebbels would be proud of this fiasco of a trial ffs!

Is this what the heart democracy looks like in 2020?



posted on Jan, 21 2020 @ 03:45 PM
link   

originally posted by: chr0naut

Trump also didn't get more of the popular votes.

But hey, Hillary was bad, eh, am I right, am I right...





Hillary is still bad... but what is this "popular vote" you speak of since I never knew it meant anything in the Presidential election...



posted on Jan, 21 2020 @ 03:46 PM
link   

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: musicismagic

I can't believe what's being proposed.

Keeping the evidence out, no witnesses, full control of the cameras???!!!

Joseph Goebbels would be proud of this fiasco of a trial ffs!

Is this what the heart democracy looks like in 2020?

Funny how you had no issues with that type of behaviour before now



posted on Jan, 21 2020 @ 03:50 PM
link   
a reply to: Breakthestreak

Where, when, how?

If you don't have witnesses it is not a trial.

If Trump has nothing to hide why not let the pertinent people speak?

Why not let him take the stand?

After all everything is ""perfect"".


This is a perversion of everything your nation stands for.

Shame on them if indeed it goes down that way.



posted on Jan, 21 2020 @ 03:52 PM
link   

originally posted by: Xtrozero

originally posted by: chr0naut

Trump also didn't get more of the popular votes.

But hey, Hillary was bad, eh, am I right, am I right...





Hillary is still bad... but what is this "popular vote" you speak of since I never knew it meant anything in the Presidential election...


They are the votes that 128,838,342‬ people cast, at the same time that those 538 people elected Trump.



posted on Jan, 21 2020 @ 03:54 PM
link   

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: Breakthestreak

Where, when, how?

If you don't have witnesses it is not a trial.

If Trump has nothing to hide why not let the pertinent people speak?

Why not let him take the stand?

After all everything is ""perfect"".


This is a perversion of everything your nation stands for.

Shame on them if indeed it goes down that way.


Shame on ‘them’ indeed.

This is a farce from day one.



posted on Jan, 21 2020 @ 03:54 PM
link   

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: Breakthestreak

Where, when, how?

If you don't have witnesses it is not a trial.

If Trump has nothing to hide why not let the pertinent people speak?

Why not let him take the stand?

After all everything is ""perfect"".


This is a perversion of everything your nation stands for.

Shame on them if indeed it goes down that way.


Shame on ‘them’ indeed.

This is a farce from day one.



posted on Jan, 21 2020 @ 03:55 PM
link   

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: Xtrozero

originally posted by: chr0naut

Trump also didn't get more of the popular votes.

But hey, Hillary was bad, eh, am I right, am I right...





Hillary is still bad... but what is this "popular vote" you speak of since I never knew it meant anything in the Presidential election...


They are the votes that 128,838,342‬ people cast, at the same time that those 538 people elected Trump.


Meaningless

Trump has the ‘popular vote’ now. That’s a certainty



posted on Jan, 21 2020 @ 03:55 PM
link   

originally posted by: chr0naut

They are the votes that 128,838,342‬ people cast, at the same time that those 538 people elected Trump.


Does that mean anything at all?

What about the 44% that didn't vote for either? Wouldn't that be the popular vote if one was going to call it that.
edit on 21-1-2020 by Xtrozero because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 21 2020 @ 04:12 PM
link   
a reply to: Breakthestreak

Day one of Trump's Presidency possible. LoL

How the feck you manage to change the rule of law to discount witnesses from a trial procedure nevermind also important pertinent incriminating evidence is beyond me.

Can you imagine if you tried drug dealers, murderers, rapists, and sex offenders in the same manner???!!!

This is complete and utter twonk.



posted on Jan, 21 2020 @ 04:26 PM
link   

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: Breakthestreak

Day one of Trump's Presidency possible. LoL

How the feck you manage to change the rule of law to discount witnesses from a trial procedure nevermind also important pertinent incriminating evidence is beyond me.

Can you imagine if you tried drug dealers, murderers, rapists, and sex offenders in the same manner???!!!

This is complete and utter twonk.


Yep

It sure is.

Sour grapes?



posted on Jan, 21 2020 @ 04:28 PM
link   

originally posted by: Xtrozero

originally posted by: chr0naut

They are the votes that 128,838,342‬ people cast, at the same time that those 538 people elected Trump.


Does that mean anything at all?

What about the 44% that didn't vote for either? Wouldn't that be the popular vote if one was going to call it that.


I see what you mean.

It looks like all voting in the US is actually futile.

So, is it best just to throw it all away?




posted on Jan, 21 2020 @ 04:33 PM
link   

originally posted by: Breakthestreak

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: Xtrozero

originally posted by: chr0naut

Trump also didn't get more of the popular votes.

But hey, Hillary was bad, eh, am I right, am I right...





Hillary is still bad... but what is this "popular vote" you speak of since I never knew it meant anything in the Presidential election...


They are the votes that 128,838,342‬ people cast, at the same time that those 538 people elected Trump.


Meaningless

Trump has the ‘popular vote’ now. That’s a certainty


Hmm... Latest 2020 General Election Polls



posted on Jan, 21 2020 @ 04:33 PM
link   
a reply to: Breakthestreak

Well, there is a bad taste in someone's mouth, that's a given.

And i think it might be Lady Justice.

No wonder shes blind.

Deaf and dumb as well by the looks of things.




top topics



 
28
<< 7  8  9    11  12  13 >>

log in

join