It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Lev Parnas, Democrat's/Socialist's New Pawn is a Russian Shill and a Liar.

page: 6
25
<< 3  4  5   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 28 2020 @ 06:00 AM
link   
a reply to: Sookiechacha

I don't think that is faked because there are other full copies of it on the net, but I don't think that is Parnas even though it does look like a younger him.




posted on Jan, 28 2020 @ 10:48 AM
link   
a reply to: Grimpachi

Yeah, there's a lot of chatter about that picture. It was only first uploaded this past weekend, which makes me believe it might have been uploaded by Parnas' defense team.

But, people argue that that Parnas was born in 1972, and would be way younger than that guy in the picture, which was taken around 30 years ago.

That's why I asked "If that's his real name" because I have a hard time believing this guy:


Was born in 1972 and is only 48 years old?

He looks 68!


edit on 28-1-2020 by Sookiechacha because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 28 2020 @ 10:55 AM
link   
a reply to: Sookiechacha

Good point.

It isn't necessary to even try to make that connection. Trump claimed he didn't know him and it was a lie. He tried playing it off as he takes pictures with everyone I am surprised he hasn't gone on to say he has dinner with everyone to discuss policy and having them get rid of people.

Unless Trump has gone senile that claim just doesn't work.



posted on Jan, 28 2020 @ 11:04 AM
link   

originally posted by: Grimpachi
a reply to: Sookiechacha

Good point.

It isn't necessary to even try to make that connection. Trump claimed he didn't know him and it was a lie. He tried playing it off as he takes pictures with everyone I am surprised he hasn't gone on to say he has dinner with everyone to discuss policy and having them get rid of people.

Unless Trump has gone senile that claim just doesn't work.


A lie?

Hell, i've had dinner with all sorts of people that I don't know and could never recall. And i've not had dinner with nearly as many people as Trump.

I had lunch with 2 people yesterday that i've never met before. If i saw them in the street or had someone ask me their name, i'd never know who it was. And we discussed a business matter including a million dollar annual loss in 2019. Its not far fetched at all.

Thursday ill do the same with 20 some odd people. Out of those 20 folks, i currently know 3 of them, and won't likely know the other 17 when the meeting is done without something noteworthy to cement my memory.



posted on Jan, 28 2020 @ 11:14 AM
link   
a reply to: Grimpachi

You think any President recalls every person they have dinner with? How many people do you think get a bit of Trump's time?



posted on Jan, 28 2020 @ 06:22 PM
link   
a reply to: bigfatfurrytexan

Do you also take the time to have your photo with them on nearly a dozen different occasions? Does your wife send them thankyou cards have your kids posed for pictures with them and had meals with them?

We also now they had at least one dinner where matters of state were discussed. If Trump is senile he may not remember him otherwise he is lying.



posted on Jan, 29 2020 @ 08:03 PM
link   

originally posted by: Grimpachi
...
Unless Trump has gone senile that claim just doesn't work.


Actually it does make sense... Presidents have taken photos with complete strangers for just contributing x amount of money to their campaigns. Taking photos doesn't equal to "being pals with that person..."

Do you actually think that when regular people ask famous people to take photos together it means the famous people know those regular people?...

Use your brain once in a while Grim.



posted on Jan, 29 2020 @ 08:06 PM
link   

originally posted by: Grimpachi
...
We also now they had at least one dinner where matters of state were discussed. If Trump is senile he may not remember him otherwise he is lying.



Whom is claiming that?... Oh yeah, Lev Parnas whom has been paid over 1 million U.S.D. by the same RUSSIAN GOVERNMENT that made up lies about President Trump to try to influence the U.S. elections...

Again Grim, use your damn brain at least once in a while.


Oh wait, I forgot, you are also one of those people whom have believed the Russian lies written by Christopher Steele...



posted on Jan, 29 2020 @ 11:24 PM
link   
a reply to: ElectricUniverse




Whom is claiming that?


Try to keep up.



There is a video of their dinner and an audio recording.

If you pull your head out of your arse you wouldn't ask such dumb questions.

edit on 29-1-2020 by Grimpachi because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 30 2020 @ 01:50 AM
link   
a reply to: Grimpachi

Lev Parnas (and attorney) were on CNN tonight. He had Anderson Cooper slobbering in anticipation of the next video Parnas alluded to. This one has President Trump in a "compromising situation", but it will only be shown if Lev is a witness for the Prosecution at President Trump's impeachment trial.

P.S. Lev said he hired this guy named IGOR, who films everything and uploads videos, photos, e-mails, and documents to a cloud. But IGOR does not know how to categorize, so it takes days to find things.


edit on 1/30/2020 by carewemust because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 30 2020 @ 05:55 AM
link   
a reply to: carewemust

Ok, if there is a video link that might be interesting. Were you watching CNN when that came on or did someone tell you about it?

I got rid of cable and TV years ago. The only TV show that has held my interest at all in years has bee the Expanse which I can download on a computer so I am out of the loop as far as 24hr news stations and all the other mind-numbing TV shows.



posted on Jan, 30 2020 @ 03:46 PM
link   
a reply to: Grimpachi

Sending thank you letters is an automatic type of deal. I've received them before, yes. I've been photographed with people I don't know, yes.

My point is that if this is the only evidence there is, there is no evidence. And since the transcript was VERY clear on what was said, it seems that a big kerfuffle has ensued needlessly (well, beyond the needs of the DNC to do what they have said since Trump was elected...."Impeach the bastard").

Let me ask you this: given the multiple comments made by House Dems that indicate their desire to impeach Trump since even before he took office, why do you put so much credence in the gray areas that they are using for ground to impeach?

Let me also ask you this: does Trump have to give a reason to fire someone in his employ? If so, why does no other president?

And one more question: is "quid pro quo" not the very essence of diplomacy? Or do we just hand out cash with no benefit to the tax payer?



posted on Jan, 30 2020 @ 11:22 PM
link   
a reply to: bigfatfurrytexan



Sending thank you letters is an automatic type of deal. I've received them before, yes. I've been photographed with people I don't know, yes.


I asked if you also take the time to have your photo with them on nearly a dozen different occasions? Does your wife send them thank you cards have your kids posed for pictures with them and had meals with them?



My point is that if this is the only evidence there is, there is no evidence. And since the transcript was VERY clear on what was said, it seems that a big kerfuffle has ensued needlessly (well, beyond the needs of the DNC to do what they have said since Trump was elected...."Impeach the bastard").


The evidence is that he lied about knowing Lev Parnas. I am not standing up for the Dems wanting to impeach him before there was anything to impeach him for. That does not mean I am against his impeachment because it is very clear that what HE did is an impeachable offense. The right should have been just as willing to impeach him for him pushing a forign government to go after his political rival just as much as the left is.

Even though I stand with the right because of the second amendment I still see them as just as slimy as the left.



Let me also ask you this: does Trump have to give a reason to fire someone in his employ? If so, why does no other president?


I have no problem with him firing people but why all the cloak and dagger. What were his reasons for firing her? Did he fire her based on the word of Lev Parnas was she doing her job or was it that she stood in the way of his little band of corruption.



And one more question: is "quid pro quo" not the very essence of diplomacy? Or do we just hand out cash with no benefit to the tax payer?


As a taxpayer his reelection is of no benefit to me. Let's call it what it was. It was a shakedown and the Whitehouse was trying to hide the means of the shakedown from the public and congress. His appointee even tried to bury the whistleblower complaint and keep it from congress. There is zero benefit to the taxpayer with what he was doing. It was all to benefit him.



posted on Jan, 30 2020 @ 11:29 PM
link   

originally posted by: Grimpachi
a reply to: carewemust

Ok, if there is a video link that might be interesting. Were you watching CNN when that came on or did someone tell you about it?

I got rid of cable and TV years ago. The only TV show that has held my interest at all in years has bee the Expanse which I can download on a computer so I am out of the loop as far as 24hr news stations and all the other mind-numbing TV shows.

I was watching CNN on Cable TV last night. Since the current impeachment witch-hunt is almost over, Maybe Lev Parnas will work with Pelosi to get the next set of impeachment articles cued up!



posted on Jan, 31 2020 @ 03:37 AM
link   
a reply to: Grimpachi

No. But im not a billionaire that folks want to leech cash from. Nor was i on my own tv show. Im a nobody.

Btw...i agree...the expanse is fantastic.



posted on Jan, 31 2020 @ 08:08 AM
link   
a reply to: Grimpachi

My first question again....

Let me ask you this: given the multiple comments made by House Dems that indicate their desire to impeach Trump since even before he took office, why do you put so much credence in the gray areas that they are using for ground to impeach?

As it regards you answer to question 2...that is whats known as "begging the question". If he can fire whomever he wants...its full stop at that point.

As it regards your answer to the last question....would you mind answering it instead of pivoting to a non answer?




top topics



 
25
<< 3  4  5   >>

log in

join