Lev Parnas

Five takeaways from Parnas's Maddow interview
thehill.com...
www.msnbc.com...

So, according to Lev Parnas, he and his attorney have had quite a whirlwind week, trying to get all his "stuff" over to the House Intelligence Committee, on deadline, so that they could be introduced as part of the official record of the House Impeachment Inquiry. This official record was part and parcel of the proverbial wheel barrel of evidence escorted by the Speaker of the House and their Managers today to the Senate.

So, maybe this was part of Nancy Pelosi's strategy to hold off on sending those articles of impeachment over to the Senate, to get that Parnas document dump on the official record, so that the Senate has to hear it when the prosecution presents its case. The defense will have to defend against it, regardless of whether or not Lev Parnas is called to testify.

I'm not really going to get into everything this chucklehead claimed during this interview, because, well....
But he sure is ready to throw Trump and company under the bus!

Also, what's up with his attorney's weird stare, like he's trying to mind control Racheal Maddow?

a reply to: Sookiechacha

What deadline exists; all normal impeachment procedure/protocol was blown to bits by rabid dog Dems.

Nothing they can do about it, the impeachment articles have concluded in the House, all that is left is to transmit them to the Senate.

If they wanted to add something, they should have done it during, not after.

Secondly, Senate rules can also prohibit any new House BS if they deemed so, Senate rules, *shrugs*

So speculations and also the Justice Department pretty much gave him the finger, literally said some of his claims are 100percent false, meh.

I honestly don't care about this anymore, hurry up and crush this GOP.

a reply to: Arnie123

If they wanted to add something, they should have done it during, not after.

Oh, it's added. Lev Parnas document dump is part of the official record that was sent to the Senate today.

House Democats announced they are providing additional evidence obtained from Rudy Giuliani associate Lev Parnas to the Senate along with articles of impeachment

www.foxnews.com...

a reply to: Sookiechacha

The news lately has been like a Clancy novel. I'm at the point of making sticky notes to keep track of character names and roles.

But you know what it is, when there a big conspiracy that's coming apart, there are alot of names that are going to be found out.

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
This official record was part and parcel of the proverbial wheel barrel of evidence escorted by the Speaker of the House and their Managers today to the Senate.

Nothing can stop the wheel(s) barrel of justice right, comrade?

You know what frequently gets hauled around in a wheelbarrow?

Horse $#%t.

a reply to: Ksihkehe

Nothing can stop the wheel(s) barrel of justice right, comrade?

My point is, according to Parnas and his attorney, they made a huge effort to somehow get all this material released to the House Intel Committee "by deadline", so that this information would be part of the official record, sent to the Senate...and how Nancy Pelosi was holding up sending that record, with the articles of impeachment, until the day after Parnas documents went public.

It's about the timing. Who knew Nancy was waiting for Lev Parnas to come through?

a reply to: Sookiechacha

Oh, hey, another whistleblower?? How...quaint.

Why, for the sake of argument, or conversation, should we believe this particular individual??

a reply to: seagull
I'm not saying that you should. But, he's got the receipts. He kept meticulous records of this criminal intentions and plans. Whether anything that he's claiming during his interview with Racheal Maddow is true, doesn't matter. The Senate only has to deal with "the receipts" that are part of the official impeachment hearing records now.

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: seagull
I'm not saying that you should. But, he's got the receipts. He kept meticulous records of this criminal intentions and plans. Whether anything that he's claiming during his interview with Racheal Maddow is true, doesn't matter. The Senate only has to deal with "the receipts" that are part of the official impeachment hearing records now.

That you even reference a Rachel Madcow interview as something any rational person should consider as credible is funny enough...

But you're missing the point that anything interjected after the impeachment vote doesn't count.

Much like Pelosi trying to tell the Senate how to proceed doesn't count.

This is just talking points for the alt-left conspiracy theorists to feed to their mentally incompetent base to keep them unhappy.

That you even took the time to post this drivel says far more about you then it does the actual topic.

/facepalm

a reply to: Lumenari

That you even reference a Rachel Madcow

This is about what Lev Parnas and his attorney said...that they rushed to make the deadline, so that their documentation would make it in the record.

But you're missing the point that anything interjected after the impeachment vote doesn't count.

Citation required. The documents are indeed included as part of the underlying evidence that accompanied the articles of impeachments, that were delivered to the Senate today. They will be presented by the prosecution at the Senate trial.

Review Nancy's body language at the signing, I love psychology, and especially body language, and have since 1974. Im pretty good at it too

Nancy is displaying fear, and uncertainty, also failure, and being pushed into failure.

If anyone knows what is up the DNCs sleeve, it's Nancy. She has dueces, and knows it, and I suspect you do too. I can understand your denial. Its hard to take a loss like this, and it's going to get much worse.
Buckle up Buttercup! Cheers!

Poor Nancy is pouring stiff drinks tonight

Can this bullcrap please be over so we can get back to making Keeping America great? The Dims have caused enough disruption with their coup attempt.

I just watched the signing on YouTube and am curious about the body language you picked up on, just out of interest which particulars show fear, uncertainty and failure, and being pushed into this failure. I’ve no particular interest in the proceedings or the politics, just the body language part of it... cheers reply to: visitedbythem

a reply to: Lumenari

Parnas served Madcow a big helping of CROW last night.

www.foxnews.com...

BTW..Nancy's strategy was to help her long-time buddy Joe Biden win in Iowa, by ensuring that Sanders and Warren would be tied up by the Senate Impeachment trial, just ahead of the caucuses.

a reply to: Sookiechacha

I can not actually believe I went to the MSNBC website. I had to get the heck out of there before I started to throw up.

And after even watching this interview, there is still no evidence of wrongdoing. They got nothin.


The Republican Senate should drag this out all the way up to election day. They have a free pass to crucify the democrats and they should drag this out until November.

a reply to: Sookiechacha

Pure bollocks.

And I'm not even British, but it seemed the best word to choose for this drivel...

a reply to: Sookiechacha

No, because the resolution was already passed through the House, essentially sealing the case prior to it's insertion into the record. Is this not right?

They won't be there long when the Senate gets hold of them.

originally posted by: visitedbythem
Review Nancy's body language at the signing, I love psychology, and especially body language, and have since 1974. Im pretty good at it too

Nancy is displaying fear, and uncertainty, also failure, and being pushed into failure.

If anyone knows what is up the DNCs sleeve, it's Nancy. She has dueces, and knows it, and I suspect you do too. I can understand your denial. Its hard to take a loss like this, and it's going to get much worse.
Buckle up Buttercup! Cheers!

Deuces?

I think that may even prove to be optimistic.

She may have finally...finally...hung herself.

It's something the people of CA should have done long ago.

She's a corrupt, conniving, self important drunk that unfortunately seems to have a lock on her congressional seat - and the reigns of House power for the time being. She's the poster child for a term limits law since Californians in her district insist on re-electing her for the pork she brings home.

Thinking americans just need to stop paying attention to this windbag.

Or as my Dad used to say - "Let he tell her story walking...."