It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

First Priority of Senate Impeachment Trial - Expose the Fake Fabricated Whistle-blower Complaint.

page: 1
36
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join
share:
+20 more 
posted on Jan, 15 2020 @ 02:11 AM
link   
Wednesday, January 15, 2020

As more about the processes leading up to the Whistle-blower complaint become known, it's becoming clearer that it was a FABRICATION (aka Hoax)...straight out of the Democrat's same old playbook.

While Devin Nunes is focused on the false statements of ICIG Michael Atkinson, the key is the contact between the ‘whistle-blower’ (Eric Ciaramella) and the House Intelligence Committee, via Mary McCord.

There’s a very strong likelihood this entire impeachment construct was manufactured out of nothing.

National Security Council resistance member Alexander Vindman starts a rumor about the Trump-Zelenskyy phone call, which he shares with CIA operative Eric Ciaramella (a John Brennan resistance associate).

Ciaramella then makes contact with resistance ally Mary McCord, in her role within the House.

McCord then helps Ciaramella create a fraudulent whistle-blower complaint via her former colleague, now ICIG, Michael Atkinson….

…And that’s what lights the fuse to get this impeachment operation started.
Much More Here: theconservativetreehouse.com...-180915

Because the Senate trial will be run under the same rules used in trying Federal crimes, if defense attorneys Prove the Whistle-blower complaint was a fabricated hoax, President Trump's Impeachment by the U.S. House, is nullified. The case against him is thrown out.

Republicans can return to helping President Trump making America Even Greater. And House Democrats can return to doing what they do best....constructing the next fake crime they want to pin on President Trump. Thereby setting the stage for Republicans re-gaining a House Majority this coming November, and a bigger landslide re-election victory for President Donald J. Trump.

-CareWeMust




posted on Jan, 15 2020 @ 02:18 AM
link   
Ciaramella will die in a mysterious 2 bullet suicide.

He is a pawn, to be thrown under the proverbial bus...

That is how Clinton associates "pass away"...
edit on 15-1-2020 by madmac5150 because: Mark my words... the dems will not let him testify...



posted on Jan, 15 2020 @ 02:31 AM
link   
a reply to: madmac5150

That's not how Schiff operates. He has a friend named Mr. Buck, who drugs them to death.



posted on Jan, 15 2020 @ 05:56 AM
link   
a reply to: carewemust

Thanks for staying on top of this, Care. You're doing an awesome job. I'm too cynical to be much help here... but I appreciate your effort.

I'll just drop a couple more interesting reports from your source:

Laura Ingraham Blocks Devin Nunes from Discussing Mary McCord Working With Adam Schiff…

Do Laura Ingraham and Mary McCord have a history together in/around Washington DC schools, law firms, clerks, social circles etc? Because obviously Ingraham doesn’t want Devin Nunes to discuss the revelations about former DOJ-NSD head Mary McCord now working with Adam Schiff on the impeachment agenda.

House Scheme Unfolds – Adam Schiff Transmits “New Evidence” to Nadler…

The Lawfare crew behind Schiff waited until the last minute to push the new “evidence” because they didn’t want republicans to deconstruct it during the impeachment evidence gathering phase. Aditionally, the Lawfare crew anticipate a Trump impeachment defense surrounding actual evidence of the Biden corruption, which makes the Trump request to Zelensky valid. So the proactive democrat strategy was/is to use the New York Times presentation of Russia hacking Burisma to negate the provenance of the evidence against the Bidens. In essence, to cast doubt upon any documents that would show Joe and Hunter Biden participating in an actual influence and money-laundering scheme.

Keeping in mind, of course, that the FISA court just appointed a Lawfare blogger to oversee their "reforms":
FISA court selects former Obama admin lawyer, left-wing blogger to oversee FBI's surveillance reforms

The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) has stunned court-watchers by selecting David Kris -- a former Obama administration lawyer who has appeared on "The Rachel Maddow Show" and written extensively in support of the FBI's surveillance practices on the left-wing blog Lawfare -- to oversee the FBI's implementation of reforms in the wake of a damning Department of Justice inspector general report last year.

It's all so incestuous and insidious...

Keep up the good work. No such thing as too much information in this case -- no matter how convoluted and confusing it may be. That's the point!
edit on 15-1-2020 by Boadicea because: spelling



posted on Jan, 15 2020 @ 07:18 AM
link   
One thing that is being missed is Democrats running not named Biden, this is their best shot to either severely wound or outright kill his campaign. They won't be doing him any favors that's for damn sure. You watch, they will be demanding him and Hunter should take the stand. Get your popcorn.



posted on Jan, 15 2020 @ 08:29 AM
link   
The more I look at this situation, the more it looks like Trump absolutely baited them with this call. If he did, he is the master of trolling. Hunter and Biden on the stand, Democrat candidates circle around them like sharks...that is just pure nasty.



posted on Jan, 15 2020 @ 08:29 AM
link   
a reply to: carewemust

I would hope the whistle blower is not exposed. If this happens then nobody would ever whistle blow anything again in the government! Besides why kill the messenger. It is irrelevant what started the effort. There have been hours of testimony under oath. It was this testimony not the whistle blower that led to the impeachment articles.

This all seems like political revenge for not having loyalty to our fuhrer.



posted on Jan, 15 2020 @ 08:30 AM
link   
a reply to: madmac5150

Probably using one of these things.



Or maybe he'll "accidently" fall on a butcher knife 15 times.



posted on Jan, 15 2020 @ 08:53 AM
link   

originally posted by: dfnj2015
a reply to: carewemust

I would hope the whistle blower is not exposed. If this happens then nobody would ever whistle blow anything again in the government! Besides why kill the messenger. It is irrelevant what started the effort. There have been hours of testimony under oath. It was this testimony not the whistle blower that led to the impeachment articles.

This all seems like political revenge for not having loyalty to our fuhrer.


The whistleblower used the wrong protocols to whistleblow. There are clear defined rules on coming forward. Whoever it is they didn't follow the rules. They should be reprimanded for that alone. Why did they get off the defined path to report it?

To me it's like someone knocking on the door of a drug cartel about a rival drug cartel's actions. Should go to the police. The police may also be corrupt but the law says to tell the police and follow the rules of the system.



posted on Jan, 15 2020 @ 09:28 AM
link   

originally posted by: Stupidsecrets
One thing that is being missed is Democrats running not named Biden, this is their best shot to either severely wound or outright kill his campaign. They won't be doing him any favors that's for damn sure. You watch, they will be demanding him and Hunter should take the stand. Get your popcorn.


It's a cost/benefit analysis. Sure, they could seriously damage Biden, but it would also expose that the entire impeachment narrative was false and damage Democrats in general even more. They're not gonna do it.

On the other hand, this is precisely why the Republicans should insist on a full trial and calling all the witnesses. They have nothing on Trump, but they can even more thoroughly expose this for the sham that it is.



posted on Jan, 15 2020 @ 09:29 AM
link   

originally posted by: dfnj2015
a reply to: carewemust

I would hope the whistle blower is not exposed. If this happens then nobody would ever whistle blow anything again in the government! Besides why kill the messenger. It is irrelevant what started the effort. There have been hours of testimony under oath. It was this testimony not the whistle blower that led to the impeachment articles.

This all seems like political revenge for not having loyalty to our fuhrer.


People would continue to use proper whistleblower procedures to report real corruption. That's not what happened here, so that is not in jeopardy.



posted on Jan, 15 2020 @ 09:49 AM
link   
a reply to: face23785

Likely they hunker down but the jockeying candidates, getting more momentum out of this, you know it's soo tempting. I imagine for Buttigieg it's like looking at the sexiest man he's ever seen, winking at him and touching his nipples. Buttigieg is married but damn. It's going to take a lot of willpower.



posted on Jan, 15 2020 @ 09:51 AM
link   

originally posted by: dfnj2015
a reply to: carewemust

I would hope the whistle blower is not exposed. If this happens then nobody would ever whistle blow anything again in the government! Besides why kill the messenger. It is irrelevant what started the effort. There have been hours of testimony under oath. It was this testimony not the whistle blower that led to the impeachment articles.

This all seems like political revenge for not having loyalty to our fuhrer.


Why were there still whistleblowers after all the ones exposed during the Obama administration then?



posted on Jan, 15 2020 @ 10:21 AM
link   

originally posted by: dfnj2015
a reply to: carewemust

I would hope the whistle blower is not exposed. If this happens then nobody would ever whistle blow anything again in the government! Besides why kill the messenger. It is irrelevant what started the effort. There have been hours of testimony under oath. It was this testimony not the whistle blower that led to the impeachment articles.

This all seems like political revenge for not having loyalty to our fuhrer.


If the accusation is false and politically motivated, then the whistle blower needs to be exposed.

While having whistle blowers is important, you cannot allow people to lob false accusations and then hide behind being a whistle blower and not substantiating or defending your claims. This is no different from a woman claiming she was raped but then not actualyl providing any evidence or substantiating her claim.

Not a single witness during congressional impeachment had first hand knowledge or could show where there was actually quid pro quo. Trump wasn't even impeached for the crime they accused him of... they had to make something else up.

The senate would expose this even further.



posted on Jan, 15 2020 @ 10:29 AM
link   
a reply to: dfnj2015

The testimony could have been 37 hours of reciting Mary Had A Little Lamb. Trump was going to be impeached by the House.

Think of it this way, would you want to face trial when all the witnesses had secondhand hearsay? No, you wouldn’t. I think most people here would speak up and say that nothing was proven against you. So why will you not afford Trump the same protections under the law that you would and should have?

Is it really all because Orange Man Bad?



posted on Jan, 15 2020 @ 11:03 AM
link   

originally posted by: dfnj2015
a reply to: carewemust
I would hope the whistle blower is not exposed. If this happens then nobody would ever whistle blow anything again in the government!

Clueless. There is no - zero - nada - zilch - reason that a whistle-blower should expect anonymity. Protections from retribution? Certainly. But there is nothing special about a whistleblower that would allow them to escape the Constitutional requirement that every accused has the right to face their accuser (in this case, the whistleblower).

Also... this wasn't a whistle-blower. It is a criminal leaker, disguised as a whistle-blower.


Besides why kill the messenger.

No one is talking about that.


It is irrelevant what started the effort.

The law plainly states otherwise.



posted on Jan, 15 2020 @ 11:10 AM
link   

originally posted by: dfnj2015
a reply to: carewemust

I would hope the whistle blower is not exposed. If this happens then nobody would ever whistle blow anything again in the government! Besides why kill the messenger. It is irrelevant what started the effort. There have been hours of testimony under oath. It was this testimony not the whistle blower that led to the impeachment articles.

This all seems like political revenge for not having loyalty to our fuhrer.


Give me a break. Everyone knows who it is - he has already been exposed.

He is not some heroic figure, he is an angry obama holdover trying to get Trump impeached. There is no validity to his claim at all and everyone paying attention knows it. In fact there is a good possibility he is part of the obama scheme to setup NABU and steal US taxpayer dollars from Ukraine.

His bias should be clearly exposed to the world to show what a farce this entire thing is.



posted on Jan, 15 2020 @ 11:21 AM
link   

originally posted by: dfnj2015
a reply to: carewemust

It is irrelevant what started the effort.


"The ends justify the means".
God help the left if Republicans ever stoop to their level.



posted on Jan, 15 2020 @ 11:22 AM
link   
Listening to Nancy talk right now on the radio.... she sounds drunk, sounds like she is spitting on the mic.



posted on Jan, 15 2020 @ 11:47 AM
link   
So now that Schiff's been 'chosen' to be a manager.

Does that mean he can't be a witness?




top topics



 
36
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join