Royals afraid of living in the US under Trump.

Chronic vitriol is all I see here. The same old noisy buffoonery directed towards and with the others in this like-minded mob.

What has Harry ever done ? Can you site any articles or events ? Has he ever done what you cavalierly think he has done ?without proof ? ?

originally posted by: zazzafrazz
a reply to: bigfatfurrytexan

I tell you brother Gorilla, coming from a country where old Queeny is Head of State to the US I am astounded how much the US are obsessed with them

But not as astounded as how many here ingest evil Murdoch lies as gospel.
I mean when did we forget he was the penultimate bad guy?

There is a small percentage of middle aged women and gay men who are iron clad anglophiles in the USA. The average American doesn't give a rat's ass about them one way or the other.

Why dont they go live in Canada with all the others who just couldnt live in the USA because of Trump?

Thats cool, I would be afraid to live is the UK with unchecked and encouraged immigration and unchecked and encouraged muslim violence and rape. It's just sooooo hard being ultra rich these days.

Why even proclaim something like this? Kind of sounds like they might be trying to influence the election just a li'l bit.

Trump should wait till they move here and then buy the house next door. Howdy neighbor.

a reply to: StratosFear

Why dont they go live in Canada

That is what they are going to do. Well part of the time anyway.

The Queen has agreed a "period of transition" in which the Duke and Duchess of Sussex will spend time in Canada and the UK.

www.bbc.co.uk...

a reply to: alldaylong

As is tradition ...

They stay in the monarch... They are mooching.. They break from the cesspool and do their own thing.. They're wrong too.



interesting

Anonymous sources from daily mail

I didn't read all the blah, blah and blah regarding this post. I'm only replying to the header of the post.

1. This is the USA. There's no "royals" here. We are all "soveriegn".

2. If you're "afraid" to live here? You probably shouldn't keep your "title" and be/stay "safe" were you're at.

3. You could always just adapt to a "Republican form of government", renounce your citizenship and by the laws of our Republic, arm yourself/yourselves/themselves, and use education and reasoning skills to know that Pres. Trump is the least of your (their) fears. The Clintons and Obama (any Dem) "fear" the daylight out of me...

I was in the sandbox with "Prince Harry". I saw the "Royal Banner" over his "FOB". But
the guy was there, serving "his country".

My advise to him, would be to stay a Brit, serve your people. Get them off the NWO agenda. And tell your wife, to STFU and be an American, for once!

God save England (UK),.Ireland and the USA!

As an expert in Royalty, I can say that the Queen does have the right to cut off their heads or place them in the Tower.

The Tower is actually a really nice hotel somewhere in Kansas. They have a mini-bar and everything. Even cashews.

a reply to: network dude

I never understood the fixation over "The Royal Family", because they have no authority. My next door neighbor openly cried when she heard that one of them died, about 1992.

Canada would be a good "happy medium". Canada is kinda "old world", yet meet a "new world", kinda freedom. Maybe in a couple hundred years? Canada will be a "Republic"? Hopefully not a Communist/ Socialist Republic. But a Republic, "ruled by law" that each man and women is "sovereign" unto themselves. That as long as they do not deprive others, of "life, liberty and happiness"? They have broken no "law".

a reply to: DBCowboy


LOL!

I ain't no expert in "royalty" either. But "H/HRM" also "owns" all the Dolphins and other "sea creatures" by "law".

There's a point, were one's ability to make such a statement and their ability to defend it? Becomes a reality/problem.
I love my UK cousins. I had some good times with them in the Sandbox. I totally get having a "rally point" a reason to bear arms! But a "common law" a "civil law" is just as good a reason, as a "figurehead".

The "Royals" are what archaic civilizations need at this time. They are not yet "sufisticated" enough to understand, that "freemen/women" don't need "backround checks" to own a steaknives.

a reply to: mtnshredder

He should install a flagpole in his front yard, raise a "rainbow" flag and Confederate "battle flag" and see which one brings down "the law" on himself.

a reply to: Plotus
I can honestly say, with my own eyes, and in front of God, as a witness. He served his country with honor.

a reply to: burdman30ott6

The average American doesn't give a rat's ass about them one way or the other.

Which is why they waste their time posting their seeming very strong opinions about them here on ATS and all over the internet?

a reply to: Freeborn

We're secretly fascinated by the Royals.

If it weren't for that little tiff we had in 1776, they'd be OUR Royals and we could act like we don't like them.

Sort of what we're doing now.

a reply to: StratosFear

Harry is more of an American than a Brit. Harry, over a couple hundred years ago? Would've ment more to G. Washington than "uniforms" for the "Army"... If "his royal highness" Harry, can get his wife/female to shut up a few minutes and stop thinking? He'd have a good thing going...

What puzzles me is Harry is so addicted to [self-snip] he can't see how stupid he looks being dragged around by his, apparently, pathetic manhood.