Actually, maybe your euro friends will get a taste of the mess too. I wouldn't mind a bit, as long as the Iraqis still acchieve the goal of
establishing their own government.
U.S. might ask NATO to take over control of Iraq occupation, page
privacy
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times
Topic started on 10-7-2003 @ 03:40 AM by CoLD aNGeR
As in the site where i did find this article this sentence belongs to it:
"Here, you deal with the mess; we gotta go invade someone or other..."
WASHINGTON -- With American costs and casualties mounting in Iraq, the Bush administration is showing new interest in putting NATO in charge of the military occupation as a way of scaling back the U.S. troop commitment, U.S. and NATO officials say.
Such a change would discomfit some administration hard-liners, as it would force the United States to share decision-making on Iraq with European leaders who opposed the U.S.-led invasion, analysts said. It might also require seeking a mandate from the United Nations Security Council, which the United States failed to get before launching the war to topple Saddam Hussein.
But as the single most powerful nation in NATO, the United States would retain military command while spreading the burden and costs among a number of nations, thereby easing demands on overstretched American forces, diplomats said.
"There is interest" in turning the mission over to NATO, although not right away, a senior Bush administration official said yesterday. "I think the American public would be pleased to see NATO helping us in Iraq. ... Americans believe in NATO and would consider it a plus to have NATO secure Iraq."
Rest of the article:
www.sunspot.net...
"Here, you deal with the mess; we gotta go invade someone or other..."
WASHINGTON -- With American costs and casualties mounting in Iraq, the Bush administration is showing new interest in putting NATO in charge of the military occupation as a way of scaling back the U.S. troop commitment, U.S. and NATO officials say.
Such a change would discomfit some administration hard-liners, as it would force the United States to share decision-making on Iraq with European leaders who opposed the U.S.-led invasion, analysts said. It might also require seeking a mandate from the United Nations Security Council, which the United States failed to get before launching the war to topple Saddam Hussein.
But as the single most powerful nation in NATO, the United States would retain military command while spreading the burden and costs among a number of nations, thereby easing demands on overstretched American forces, diplomats said.
"There is interest" in turning the mission over to NATO, although not right away, a senior Bush administration official said yesterday. "I think the American public would be pleased to see NATO helping us in Iraq. ... Americans believe in NATO and would consider it a plus to have NATO secure Iraq."
Rest of the article:
www.sunspot.net...
reply posted on 10-7-2003 @ 09:29 AM by 29MV29
Does that mean NATO will be in full control of Iraqi oil? Or is the U.S. conveniently maintaining control of them.
NATO Homepage
NATO Homepage
reply posted on 10-7-2003 @ 10:06 AM by CoLD aNGeR
Originally posted by 29MV29
Does that mean NATO will be in full control of Iraqi oil? Or is the U.S. conveniently maintaining control of them.
NATO Homepage
Very good question, buy i guess, nato pays the rebuiling, and Us getīs the oil.
Remember Kosovo and Yugoslavia and so on?
Nato paid all also europe, but at the end, the companies rebuilding the country and the balcans are americans, and guess who paid to them EUROPE!!! yeahhhh nice isnīt ?
Anyway doesnīt matter, europe america or whatever they are all Tools for the cabal, we just play their game and believe it...
Itīs time to wake up!!!
Pages: ^^TOP^^
Top General: Obama knew OBL\'s Hideout Since Summer of 2010 - Refused to Act
Posted 18 days ago with 22 member flags
Posted 18 days ago with 22 member flags
False Flag! CIA Thwarts Another Al-Qaida Underwear Bomb Plot
Posted 17 days ago with 18 member flags
Posted 17 days ago with 18 member flags
Women at 9/11 trial should cover up out of respect for terrorists: non-Muslim lawyer who wore hijab
Posted 18 days ago with 13 member flags
Posted 18 days ago with 13 member flags
911 Trial Muslim Terrorists: "I spit on their Graves" KSM and co-jihadists mock victims, turn cour
Posted 17 days ago with 11 member flags
Posted 17 days ago with 11 member flags
Insider Information - Contractors in Iraq/Afghanistan, crimes against humanity
Posted 11 days ago with 9 member flags
Posted 11 days ago with 9 member flags
The Above Top Secret Web sites are a
wholly owned social content community of
The Above Network, LLC.
This content community relies on
user-generated content from our member contributors.
The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership
who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides
a collaborative venue for free expression.
ATS Server: www3.theabovenetwork.com
Header data: 0.008 seconds
Page processed in: 0.065 seconds
wholly owned social content community of
The Above Network, LLC.
This content community relies on
user-generated content from our member contributors.
The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership
who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides
a collaborative venue for free expression.
ATS Server: www3.theabovenetwork.com
Header data: 0.008 seconds
Page processed in: 0.065 seconds
