It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: KindraLaBelle
Great thread
Last year I took my mil to a psychiatrist because she started to act weird. After many tests he diagnosed her with chronic psychosis. Nothing can be done about it and medication doesn't work or has to many side effects. So we just have to let her be for now and hope it never gets worse.
When I discussed this with the psychiatrist he told me to look at it this way:
One of her things is to have conversations with people on the tv, she is convinced they are talking to her directly. The Dr said that in a way this isn't very different then a deeply religious person who talks to God and is convinced that God talks back to him. The 'believing it to be true without a doubt' is the same process in both examples.
Also, in both examples, the believing makes the person happy and hopeful and it fulfills a need in their lives and therefor is looked at as a positive thing in his/her life.
Dr said that it doesn't really matter what anyone else thinks of it. As long as they are happy and not harming anyone else, it won't be treated as a mental illness, but in the textbook both cases are considered psychosis. Be it mass psychosis in the second.
I had several experiences myself that could count as textbook psychosis, although I consider myself in perfect mental health! Maybe it's just part of human nature...
originally posted by: silo13
a reply to: gosseyn
NOT to believe in God is an illness - of willful ignorance.
Put it this way.
Regardless if you 'believe' in the Bible or not? All the 'prophecies' of Christ have come true with not many more left to go.
So - you can choose:
A: The Bible proves the existence of Christ by mathematical probability based on those prophecies.
OR
'It's all just made up'....
And if you choose, the mathematical (near) impossibility those prophecies are a 'coincidence'?
You've got a mental problem.
And it's called 'willful ignorance'.
originally posted by: Raggedyman
a reply to: TzarChasm
Yeah, sure
But who is “we”
It needs a little clarification
While I might agree with your opinion of keeping religion out of politics, who gets to decide what is religion. I believe many atheists have a religious bent as we both know
originally posted by: Raggedyman
a reply to: TzarChasm
So whatever you and yours decides, even your religious beliefs but only yours
You know what hypocrisy is don’t you TC
If atheists were genuinely good people, but they are not
I find you no better in most circumstances than an extremist fundamentalist christian, a wesborough equivalent but atheistic
Compromise I guess
originally posted by: Raggedyman
a reply to: TzarChasm
So whatever you and yours decides, even your religious beliefs but only yours
You know what hypocrisy is don’t you TC
If atheists were genuinely good people, but they are not
I find you no better in most circumstances than an extremist fundamentalist christian, a wesborough equivalent but atheistic
Compromise I guess
originally posted by: TzarChasm
What's so wrong with what I said? I didn't say silence the Christians or abolish the church. I said theism as a general principle is not relevant to government.