People who lick the bottom of Trumps boot

originally posted by: Liquesence

Talk about reality.

Want to talk about Obama an appeasement and it didn't work. This was a huge move away from that logic that ME just fed on over and over. How do you think old Kim sees this or China, Russia... They are like oh sh!t this isn't Obama.

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: DanDanDat
Does Trump even wear boots?

Trump wears the best boots. He has the greatest boots.

With delicious tasty bottoms.

Stop drooling.

a reply to: Xtrozero

How do you think old Kim sees this or China, Russia

Like they played the idiot Trump for the fool he is, as they laugh every night.

a reply to: Liquesence

The first 8 years of Obama's presidency, it was Bush's fault.

The first 4 years of Trump's presidency is all because of Obama.




Well, at least you leftists are finally admitting that things are doing better. That's a start.

a reply to: DBCowboy

At least you see your own hypocrisy.

Things are bad, blame Obama.

Things are good, praise Trump.

At least be honest and consistent.

originally posted by: Liquesence
a reply to: DBCowboy

At least you see your own hypocrisy.

Things are bad, blame Obama.

Things are good, praise Trump.

At least be honest and consistent.

You're not making any sense, but at least you're consistent.

originally posted by: Liquesence

Like they played the idiot Trump for the fool he is, as they laugh every night.

Lets get to basics here instead of your "I hate Trump drivel". Do you see killing Soleimani as a positive or negative event?

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Liquesence
a reply to: DBCowboy

At least you see your own hypocrisy.

Things are bad, blame Obama.

Things are good, praise Trump.

At least be honest and consistent.

You're not making any sense, but at least you're consistent.

Speak for yourself.

originally posted by: Xtrozero

originally posted by: Liquesence

Like they played the idiot Trump for the fool he is, as they laugh every night.

Lets get to basics here instead of your "I hate Trump drivel". Do you see killing Soleimani as a positive or negative event?

Back to basics here: Should the Senate impeachment trial have witnesses? Or should it be a cover up?

a reply to: Liquesence

Hunter Biden, Joe Biden, the whistleblower, and of course, kangaroos.

a reply to: DBCowboy

Bolton, Mnuechen, Pompeo, Rudy, and of course, Swamp creatures.

DO NOT bring kangaroos into this.



And if you even talk about koalas...I throw down my gauntlet.

originally posted by: Liquesence

Back to basics here: Should the Senate impeachment trial have witnesses? Or should it be a cover up?

You can't answer a question with a question...lol

Answer my question please and explain why....

As to yours, it depends...What the house did was not the norm, they changed so many rules and even changed the actual charges. lol

At this point it is not up to the senate to bring witnesses forward, that was the responsibility of the house , or are you suggesting they impeached the President without all the fact?

So after you answer my first question, what say you if the chief justice rules dismissal?

a reply to: DBCowboy

The trial should be dismissed like any frivolous trial. But of course it was never about justice anyways. It was about giving a show trial.

a reply to: Xtrozero

The morons in the House couldn't find anything, so they throw a Hail Mary hoping Schumer can catch it, but he's on the sidelines getting Pelosi another drink.

The is a slow-motion coup attempt that the idiots are trying to legitimize.

originally posted by: CitizenZero
a reply to: DBCowboy

The trial should be dismissed like any frivolous trial. But of course it was never about justice anyways. It was about giving a show trial.

The trial has all the seriousness, legitimacy, legal standing, authority, of a Taco Bell clown fart.

a reply to: Xtrozero

What the house did was not the norm, they changed so many rules and even changed the actual charges. lol

They followed the rules passed by Republicans.

At this point it is not up to the senate to bring witnesses forward,

Do you understand the concept of a trial? Trials involve witnesses. And how past impeachment trials have been conducted, with witnesses?

If he's innocent, call all the witnesses. All of them. After all, he's innocent, the call was perfect, right? They should testify how innocent he is, right?

Spare me your BS.

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: CitizenZero
a reply to: DBCowboy

The trial should be dismissed like any frivolous trial. But of course it was never about justice anyways. It was about giving a show trial.

The trial has all the seriousness, legitimacy, legal standing, authority, of a Taco Bell clown fart.

If McConnell has his way, yes.

Kind of surprised this thread has gone on this many pages, everyone should know by now that the OP is just a Troll set out to get knee jerk reactions from people.

Dont feed him, and ignore him into obscurity, Im only posting to address those that are NOT of the same ilk.

Stop responding to any posts and threads, and he will go away or jump to another puppet account we can also ignore, its the only way to restore some of the integrity to ATS

originally posted by: CitizenZero
a reply to: DBCowboy

The trial should be dismissed like any frivolous trial. But of course it was never about justice anyways. It was about giving a show trial.

Incorrect, LesMis/Propagandolf/Bucky/et al.

It's always been about the rule of law, separation of powers, abuse of power and contempt.

originally posted by: Liquesence

originally posted by: CitizenZero
a reply to: DBCowboy

The trial should be dismissed like any frivolous trial. But of course it was never about justice anyways. It was about giving a show trial.

Incorrect, LesMis/Propagandolf/Bucky/et al.

It's always been about the rule of law, separation of powers, abuse of power and contempt.

Sorry wut? I’m not sure what those words are supposed to mean.

Given the evidence There was zero abuse of power here.