It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Pelosi to announce articles declaring Trump committed war crimes

page: 4
37
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join
share:
+5 more 
posted on Jan, 6 2020 @ 12:43 PM
link   
a reply to: muzzleflash

Trump didn't just get up and bust a cap in some terrorists ass.

There are channels, procedures, steps, policy and programs that he has to go through. The Pentagon gave the option, Trump signed off on it.

If it was an "illegal" option, do you honestly think the Pentagon, the White House staff, Pompeo and his staff, hell. . . the entire State department would have even brought it to him?




posted on Jan, 6 2020 @ 12:44 PM
link   

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: Notoneofyou

So Pelosi is defending Iran now.



This timeline is full of stupid people.



Trump got the left to defend and praise a genocidal terrorist.

Well, after the KKK and their fascination with socialism and communism, its not hard to do I suppose.



posted on Jan, 6 2020 @ 12:44 PM
link   
Assuming she goes through with this; my only conclusion is that she must really think Trump is going to win in 2020. That DNC internal polling must really show a clear victory for Trump.

It really is the only explanation for such a move; neutering all future presidents from taking militery action with out the approval of Congress. A power her chamber were loath to take up even in the face of real war such as the Iraqi war. To back track on such a strong precedent that she helped to create there must be something monumental that is compelling her ... a second loss to Trump is the only thing I can think of.



posted on Jan, 6 2020 @ 12:44 PM
link   
a reply to: Ahabstar

At times it is tough trying to understand just who are the people who frequent this sight, trying to have conversations with them, to understand if what they are saying is true or not, is honest or not, is serious or not. At times I find that I take you seriously. At times, well, just what are you getting at by your post.

Are you joking or am I missing something here, Are you serious? Are you suggesting that Trump declare those people who voted against him, roughly half the population, as domestic terrorists and that our military should get ready to round them all up upon his orders? Or maybe not half the population but merely Democrats? And maybe not all Democrats but only those of us who speak out about why we do not want him as potus? Just where do you draw the line if you are serious.

If you are only joking I must say that joking about a president of the United States rounding up his opposition is not a very funny thing for some of us to contemplate.



posted on Jan, 6 2020 @ 12:46 PM
link   

originally posted by: gortex
a reply to: Notoneofyou




stating President Trump's latest actions resulting in the death of a known terrorist was imprudent and provocative, usurping Congress ' right to tell him what he can or can not do.

It seems Soleimani was in Iraq to negotiate an easing of tensions in the region , not good for the warmongers who want conflict with Iran.
This hit smells but yeah keep buying into the terrorist narative , it's what they want you to think.

Qassem Soleimani, the Iranian Quds Force commander who was killed in a US drone attack in Baghdad on Friday, was in Iraq to negotiate a de-escalation in tensions with Saudi Arabia, according to the Iraqi prime minister.

Adel Abdul Mahdi, Iraq’s caretaker prime minister, told his parliament on Sunday that President Trump called him to ask for help in mediating with Iran after the American embassy in Baghdad was attacked.
www.dailymail.co.uk...


Trump's action was a criminal act , his extrajudicial hit against a high ranking military commander is an act of war and indeed a crime , it's the sort of thing rogue nations with no respect for international law do.
Trump's threat to hit Iranian cultural sites would also be a crime if he carries it out.

Making America great one bomb at a time.


Per the UN....your liberal gods, he was not allowed to leave Iran.

For ANY reason.



posted on Jan, 6 2020 @ 12:49 PM
link   
a reply to: chr0naut

The NDAA negates all of that. Just like the government has done since the early 1900's they pass laws that effectively take away your rights.

I am not saying it is right, as I have been opposed to some strikes that POTUS's have done but what Trump did is legal in the eyes of the Congress. After all, they approved it. THe voted it in.

The NDAA expands on the AUMF. The main parts passed during the last administration.



posted on Jan, 6 2020 @ 12:49 PM
link   

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: muzzleflash

Trump didn't just get up and bust a cap in some terrorists ass.

There are channels, procedures, steps, policy and programs that he has to go through. The Pentagon gave the option, Trump signed off on it.

If it was an "illegal" option, do you honestly think the Pentagon, the White House staff, Pompeo and his staff, hell. . . the entire State department would have even brought it to him?



Well, we're talking to people that took Joy Behar's reaction and opinions of a TIME magazine cover as fact. And now believe that Trump actually said he was above the law. dailycaller.com...

The left plays the telephone game with itself, confirmed.



posted on Jan, 6 2020 @ 12:49 PM
link   

originally posted by: matafuchs
a reply to: muzzleflash

No. I made a comparison. I was trying to illicit a response for conversation and /or debate but you just want to call me a libtard. Before discussion you put the other person down...now, that is a very very Libtard move but I won't call you that ok?

I also was not stating YOU should move. Again, making a comparison of those who complain, like media and Hollywood, who put up and make threats and scurry back to thise million dollar mansions.

Check you BP...


Use your common sense before blindly supporting partisanship in your politics.

You guys (The Trump) were our only hope for world peace and draining the swamp.

But no one went after Zbignew or Kissenger, Trump filled his cabinet and agencies with Swamp Gators, he ignores all the obvious crooks and didn't bring up a single criminal charge on Hitlery or Obummer. Though it be way more solid than the fake Russia/Ukraine gibberish that they pinned on him so easily.

Though here we are, surrounded by vultures, able to criminally charge the innocent of non-crimes while the barons get away with EVERYTHING!!

And yet you guys are defending this sham?

All of them need to be in prison, ALL of them.
edit on 1/6/2020 by muzzleflash because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 6 2020 @ 12:54 PM
link   

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: muzzleflash

Trump didn't just get up and bust a cap in some terrorists ass.

There are channels, procedures, steps, policy and programs that he has to go through. The Pentagon gave the option, Trump signed off on it.

If it was an "illegal" option, do you honestly think the Pentagon, the White House staff, Pompeo and his staff, hell. . . the entire State department would have even brought it to him?



After the way all of them have tried over and over to set him up for impeachment??

Yes I absolutely believe they'd trick him into committing an illegal assassination.

Then they'll disappear back to their cushy overpaid jobs at the NRO or DIA or whatever swamp they climbed out of.

So Yeah.



posted on Jan, 6 2020 @ 12:54 PM
link   
a reply to: theatreboy




Per the UN....your liberal gods, he was not allowed to leave Iran.

For ANY reason.

Link ?



posted on Jan, 6 2020 @ 12:55 PM
link   
a reply to: muzzleflash

He has not brought anything up because his hands are tied right now domestically. He needed to replace judges. He needed to change the mindset and you will see after his election in 2020 those things happen when he House flips and the 'swamp' has actually been exposed.

I am not a Trumper. However, I support the administration. I have supported all of the past also because it is our leader. Do I have to agree? No. Do I have to like it? No. Can I vote and hope? Yes.

There are those who deserve to be in jail but sorry, our current president is not one of them. There was no assassination. There was a death in the theater of combat.



posted on Jan, 6 2020 @ 12:57 PM
link   
a reply to: muzzleflash

In order for your assertion to be correct, the entire State department and Pentagon, along with AFRICOM and supporting military would have to be in on the plot to make Trump believe he was acting accordingly when all the time, he'd be acting illegally.




posted on Jan, 6 2020 @ 12:57 PM
link   

originally posted by: Arnie123
a reply to: muzzleflash

Dude spare us your diatribe, ugh.


You can't handle opposing views can you?

Spoken EXACTLY like a Liberal.

You do realize you're reading from their book now right?

Can't handle an opposing view. You wish I was censored so you can circle jerk in the echo chamber unchallenged?



posted on Jan, 6 2020 @ 12:57 PM
link   
Pelosi to announce articles declaring Trump committed war crimes

She'll probably sit on like her impeachment snip.

I mean if shes this stupid and going to alienate millions of veterans.

Go right on ahead.

It'ss not like either the Senate or the prez himself will sign off it.

And a single house can not limit the power of the commander in chief.

You know it.

I know it.

Everyone that's not a NPC knows it.



posted on Jan, 6 2020 @ 12:58 PM
link   

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: muzzleflash

In order for your assertion to be correct, the entire State department and Pentagon, along with AFRICOM and supporting military would have to be in on the plot to make Trump believe he was acting accordingly when all the time, he'd be acting illegally.





Nah, only one person is required, though I bet a handful would love to get rid of him and would pull this kinda #.

You do remember what happened with the FBI right????



posted on Jan, 6 2020 @ 01:00 PM
link   
I think we should just leave all these terrorists over alone so we can make the whiny ass liberals happy because let's face it, the left actually supports these terrorists now, just look at the comments in this thread alone.

Then when Iran goes nuclear and blows up a European country, we can just shrug our shoulders and say I told ya so.



posted on Jan, 6 2020 @ 01:00 PM
link   

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: muzzleflash

Trump didn't just get up and bust a cap in some terrorists ass.

There are channels, procedures, steps, policy and programs that he has to go through. The Pentagon gave the option, Trump signed off on it.

If it was an "illegal" option, do you honestly think the Pentagon, the White House staff, Pompeo and his staff, hell. . . the entire State department would have even brought it to him?



When people think a president can start a nuclear war during breckfest because he is unstable and has access to "the button" an argument regarding the finer details of militery action are a waist of time.

I have to believe there are people out there who truly believe that Trump flew the drone himself ... like the video games these people are preoccupied with.



posted on Jan, 6 2020 @ 01:04 PM
link   
a reply to: DanDanDat

Hair Force 1




posted on Jan, 6 2020 @ 01:05 PM
link   

originally posted by: muzzleflash

originally posted by: Arnie123
a reply to: muzzleflash

Dude spare us your diatribe, ugh.


You can't handle opposing views can you?

Spoken EXACTLY like a Liberal.

You do realize you're reading from their book now right?

Can't handle an opposing view. You wish I was censored so you can circle jerk in the echo chamber unchallenged?
Not at all, you need to calm down and stop assuming. We live in a democracy, right? There are discussions on an open forum where we can exchange ideas and views without reprimand, respectifully of course, why would you assume I want you censored?

I too have the freedom and ability to express my discomfort at your bellowing, which I did, by remarking, "Please spare us your diatribe."

I am under no illusion as to the position of the United States and its ability to pull rank whenever, however, without letting you know jack squat either.

As the worlds foremost preeminent Military superpower, we can strike and deploy any number of assets and platforms at any given point at any part of the world in less than 24hrs.

Very unpopular and uncomfortable fact, but my point is, the US deemed this guy too dangerous as his actions resulted in the deaths of many Americans, hurt others and attacked our embassies, therefore, we took it upon our power and position to attack.



posted on Jan, 6 2020 @ 01:07 PM
link   

Nonetheless, Pelosi’s letter indicates that the House will declare the president’s action illegal under international law.


www.breitbart.com...



U.S. forces have now surpassed 2,800 strikes against targets in Iraq and Syria under President Obama’s war against the Islamic State, all as part of a conflict Congress has yet to specifically authorize — and amid worries lawmakers won’t ever act.


Pelosi and her henchman are TRAITORS.

By the LEGAL definition OF.



18 U.S. Code § 2381.Treason




Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.


www.law.cornell.edu...




top topics



 
37
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join