Trump assassinated man brokering peace (reduced tension) in Persian Gulf

originally posted by: Xtrozero

originally posted by: chr0naut

I didn't say Soleimani was good. He's killed people.

Would you say he has killed Americans? Or at least was directly in the line of leadership in the death of Americans?

Yes, he has killed Americans.

Have Americans killed Iraqi's and Iranian's?

You are trying to argue that one side is better than the other.

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: chr0naut
Good to know you dont side with the usa.
No worries
We reslly dont need your help or approval.

Fair enough.

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: Xtrozero

originally posted by: chr0naut

I didn't say Soleimani was good. He's killed people.

Would you say he has killed Americans? Or at least was directly in the line of leadership in the death of Americans?

Yes, he has killed Americans.

Have Americans killed Iraqi's and Iranian's?

You are trying to argue that one side is better than the other.

I Will 100% SAY THAT!

I'm an american so I know how lucky we are to live in a civilized country.

The Iraqi and Iranians run around with suicide bombs strapped them. Killing women and children. Soliemani ordered these types of attacks.

Go ahead and double down on loving you some terrorism!

Lolz🤪

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: LSU2018

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: LSU2018
a reply to: chr0naut

Cute. You're siding with a terrorist because..........Trump.

No, I'm not siding with either.

Re-read what you wrote.

I didn't say Soleimani was good. He's killed people.

I didn't say Trump was good. He's killed people.

I said that Trump had "killed a valuable ally in the US war on terror".

I still haven't seen anything that suggests that Soleimani had anything directly to do with the embassy attack. There were no deaths or even serious injuries at the embassy, from the attack. If that were the actual reason for the assassination of Soleimani, it seems a bit heavy handed.

2019–20 attack on the United States embassy in Baghdad
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Valuable allies kill and maim our troops? I’ll admit it’s not the first time it’s happened, but I’ve never been particularly fond of it.

a reply to: chr0naut

Freedom is the only way.

originally posted by: chr0naut

Yes, he has killed Americans.

Have Americans killed Iraqi's and Iranian's?

You are trying to argue that one side is better than the other.

Not saying one side is better than the other. If you killed Americans then you are legally on the hit list...Even Rice said that Obama would have droned him but never had the opportunity. I think she was full of it, just trying to say "line in the sand" Obama was willing to make the call, we know he wasn't, but in any case she thinks it was OK.

There also is no expiration date on evil deeds, I'm sure that goes both ways... This guy was bad, I'm happy he is no longer here.

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: Xtrozero

originally posted by: chr0naut

I didn't say Soleimani was good. He's killed people.

Would you say he has killed Americans? Or at least was directly in the line of leadership in the death of Americans?

Yes, he has killed Americans.

Have Americans killed Iraqi's and Iranian's?

You are trying to argue that one side is better than the other.

You’re catching on. The American side is infinitely better than the Iranian side. Would you prefer to live in Iran or the United States? Which nation has four times as many immigrants as the nation with the second largest number of immigrants? Hint: It’s not Iran. Which nation is not a theocracy, but rather a democracy where women and homosexuals can vote and adulterers are not stoned to death? Which nation does not have a huge secret police force that uses deadly violence against protesters? I could go on all day with this.

originally posted by: Scepticaldem

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: Xtrozero

originally posted by: chr0naut

I didn't say Soleimani was good. He's killed people.

Would you say he has killed Americans? Or at least was directly in the line of leadership in the death of Americans?

Yes, he has killed Americans.

Have Americans killed Iraqi's and Iranian's?

You are trying to argue that one side is better than the other.

I Will 100% SAY THAT!

I'm an american so I know how lucky we are to live in a civilized country.

The Iraqi and Iranians run around with suicide bombs strapped them. Killing women and children. Soliemani ordered these types of attacks.

Go ahead and double down on loving you some terrorism!

Lolz🤪

Please post some evidence that supports what you said.

There are many highly civilized countries. I wouldn't class America above them.

originally posted by: Lysergic
a reply to: chr0naut

Freedom is the only way.

A country which still allows slavery (13th amendment allows slavery for convicts, but does not place any limitations on the seriousness of the crime), was one of the last in the world to do something about slavery, and that has the highest incarcerated population per capita, and also in total numbers incarcerated, has freedom?

The word is meaningless in the US context.

originally posted by: Xtrozero

originally posted by: chr0naut

Yes, he has killed Americans.

Have Americans killed Iraqi's and Iranian's?

You are trying to argue that one side is better than the other.

Not saying one side is better than the other. If you killed Americans then you are legally on the hit list...Even Rice said that Obama would have droned him but never had the opportunity. I think she was full of it, just trying to say "line in the sand" Obama was willing to make the call, we know he wasn't, but in any case she thinks it was OK.

There also is no expiration date on evil deeds, I'm sure that goes both ways... This guy was bad, I'm happy he is no longer here.

So, if one guy is guilty of murder, forever, because he killed someone. Doesn't fairness require that also we apply the same rule to others who have also murdered someone?

At the very least, the POTUS should get a trial that he didn't afford Soleimani.

a reply to: chr0naut

SO i guess the man who was at the embassy meeting him was innocent and on a diplomatic mission too right? They also wrote his name in the embassy to say who was their master. the UN had told him do not leave Iran or he risk his life because they also wanted him dead if possible.

originally posted by: operation mindcrime
Still wondering why they had to drone-bomb the guy??

Could they not have arrested him?

Peace

Oh no,because then he can claim diplomatic immunity. This way they can say WHoops, collatoral damage if need be.

a reply to: chr0naut
Only American lives count! the tens of thousands of innocents are just collateral damage and not important.

If fair is fair, when is Bush going on trial I wonder?

a reply to: yuppa
NOBODY is innocent.

Now the President “murdered someone”?!?!?!

WTF?

And I thought leftists were thick and out of touch with reality.

TDS grows day by day

originally posted by: vonclod
a reply to: chr0naut
Only American lives count! the tens of thousands of innocents are just collateral damage and not important.

If fair is fair, when is Bush going on trial I wonder?

Well, I think they'll all stand trial before God, but I don't think justice will be done against American leaders, by American leaders. Something about honor among thieves, perhaps?

originally posted by: Breakthestreak
Now the President “murdered someone”?!?!?!

WTF?

And I thought leftists were thick and out of touch with reality.

TDS grows day by day

Did he order and authorize an air strike? Did it kill someone? Was it premeditated?

Surely that is murder?

a reply to: chr0naut

Umm, didn't you already admit that you aren't on the side of America, the Constitution?

Wouldn't that make you an enemy of America?

Not saying you can't comment, just putting it out there that you are against America.

I mean, we have plenty of anti-Americans on this site.

What's one more, amirite?

*rah*

*Death to America*

(Just wanted to make you feel more comfortable)

originally posted by: vonclod
a reply to: yuppa
NOBODY is innocent.

Children are. NEVER talk in absolutes. Trump was biblically backed up here as well because this would be considered justifiable homicide. Protecting people from a killer.

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: Breakthestreak
Now the President “murdered someone”?!?!?!

WTF?

And I thought leftists were thick and out of touch with reality.

TDS grows day by day

Did he order and authorize an air strike? Did it kill someone? Was it premeditated?

Surely that is murder?

Sorry

Wrong

As per usual for you

That is not murder. But hey, you eat the media-pie