It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Think about all of the media panel discussions on gun ownership you have watched; segments where second amendment advocates were ridiculed by media pundits for daring to bring up the possibility of the U.S. government using arms against U.S. citizens who hold opposing political views… There are hundreds of recent reference points.
Now consider, earlier today U.S. House of Representatives Legal Counsel, Douglas Letter, argued in court it would be a possible remedy -for a conflict between branches of government- for Speaker Nancy Pelosi to order an armed “gun battle” between the House and the United States Department of Justice. Yes, this actually happened.
At the same time as national Democrat political candidates are arguing to remove the constitutional rights of law-abiding gun owners, the highest ranking Democrat in the United States; a person only two succession-steps away from the presidency; is arguing in DC federal court the House could begin an armed conflict against the Dept. of Justice.
I had to smile at that..
They won’t take out the Iranian militants but will take out the DOJ?
Ridiculous.
originally posted by: 727Sky
The title is misleading as it was a lawyer who said Pelosi has the power to send the Congressional Sargent of arms to collect some paperwork from the DOJ which presently is refusing to turn over to congress. No where did I see or read that Pelosi actually threatened such an action; just lawyer talk.. But... It did get my blood pressure up when I saw the title simply because IMO Pelosi needs to stop drinking or change her meds..
Think about all of the media panel discussions on gun ownership you have watched; segments where second amendment advocates were ridiculed by media pundits for daring to bring up the possibility of the U.S. government using arms against U.S. citizens who hold opposing political views… There are hundreds of recent reference points.
Now consider, earlier today U.S. House of Representatives Legal Counsel, Douglas Letter, argued in court it would be a possible remedy -for a conflict between branches of government- for Speaker Nancy Pelosi to order an armed “gun battle” between the House and the United States Department of Justice. Yes, this actually happened.
At the same time as national Democrat political candidates are arguing to remove the constitutional rights of law-abiding gun owners, the highest ranking Democrat in the United States; a person only two succession-steps away from the presidency; is arguing in DC federal court the House could begin an armed conflict against the Dept. of Justice.
theconservativetreehouse.com...-180055< br /> The comment in court starts at 1:30 and it consist of sending the Sargent of arms to the DOJ.. I think the article is blown out of proportion to the actual event however if you listen it was brought up ..but was also followed by " Why we go to court so an armed confrontation can be avoided"..Hummm Does that mean, "Judge side with us or we will have to go to plan B ?"
youtu.be...
The first comment to the article said:I had to smile at that..
They won’t take out the Iranian militants but will take out the DOJ?
Ridiculous.
Next thing when considering some kind of civil war is a Clemson Prof: "Civil War is Coming & It's Going to Get Violent" who was on " JoshTolley" youtube channel.. I doubt many will take the time to listen but he gives all kinds of reasons why he believes there is a strong possibility that such a thing just might happen.. I am a fence sitter (10% maybe and 90% it will not happen) as far as any kind major American armed conflict happening however, I am far removed from the states and can only get my news from articles and places like ATS.. So members of ATS might have a different take on the whole thing. youtu.be...
Now consider, earlier today U.S. House of Representatives Legal Counsel, Douglas Letter, argued in court it would be a possible remedy -for a conflict between branches of government- for Speaker Nancy Pelosi to order an armed “gun battle” between the House and the United States Department of Justice. Yes, this actually happened.
When pressed by Rao about what would happen if the Justice Department refused to comply, the House counsel added: “We can send the sergeant-at-arms and he can have a gun battle.”
Speaker Pelosi Threatens Possibility of Armed Conflict Against U.S. Department of Justice
originally posted by: Subaeruginosa
a reply to: 727Sky
Speaker Pelosi Threatens Possibility of Armed Conflict Against U.S. Department of Justice
Yeah obviously the headline is "misleading", you got it from the conservative tree house after all!.
But since you already went there, wouldn't that just make her a patriotic American, according to the 2nd amendment?
originally posted by: Subaeruginosa
a reply to: 727Sky
Speaker Pelosi Threatens Possibility of Armed Conflict Against U.S. Department of Justice
Yeah obviously the headline is "misleading", you got it from the conservative tree house after all!.
But since you already went there, wouldn't that just make her a patriotic American, according to the 2nd amendment?
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: 727Sky
You do know that the sergeant of arms is not actually armed don't you?
He is in charge of keeping order. He doesn't shoot people to do that.
“I didn’t carry it all the time," former Senate Sergeant-at-Arms Terrance W. Gainer said on C-SPAN's "Washington Journal" Thursday morning. "I had it close at hand in a locked compartment." Gainer, who served as chief of the Capitol Police before his seven-year gig in the Senate, said he frequently relied on the uniformed officers of the department. "We have concentric circles of security around here and so they are the first line of defense, but as the chief law enforcement officer, I was armed when I needed to be or thought it was appropriate," he said.
originally posted by: DeathSlayer
originally posted by: 727Sky
The title is misleading as it was a lawyer who said Pelosi has the power to send the Congressional Sargent of arms to collect some paperwork from the DOJ which presently is refusing to turn over to congress. No where did I see or read that Pelosi actually threatened such an action; just lawyer talk.. But... It did get my blood pressure up when I saw the title simply because IMO Pelosi needs to stop drinking or change her meds..
Think about all of the media panel discussions on gun ownership you have watched; segments where second amendment advocates were ridiculed by media pundits for daring to bring up the possibility of the U.S. government using arms against U.S. citizens who hold opposing political views… There are hundreds of recent reference points.
Now consider, earlier today U.S. House of Representatives Legal Counsel, Douglas Letter, argued in court it would be a possible remedy -for a conflict between branches of government- for Speaker Nancy Pelosi to order an armed “gun battle” between the House and the United States Department of Justice. Yes, this actually happened.
At the same time as national Democrat political candidates are arguing to remove the constitutional rights of law-abiding gun owners, the highest ranking Democrat in the United States; a person only two succession-steps away from the presidency; is arguing in DC federal court the House could begin an armed conflict against the Dept. of Justice.
theconservativetreehouse.com...-180055< br /> The comment in court starts at 1:30 and it consist of sending the Sargent of arms to the DOJ.. I think the article is blown out of proportion to the actual event however if you listen it was brought up ..but was also followed by " Why we go to court so an armed confrontation can be avoided"..Hummm Does that mean, "Judge side with us or we will have to go to plan B ?"
youtu.be...
The first comment to the article said:I had to smile at that..
They won’t take out the Iranian militants but will take out the DOJ?
Ridiculous.
Next thing when considering some kind of civil war is a Clemson Prof: "Civil War is Coming & It's Going to Get Violent" who was on " JoshTolley" youtube channel.. I doubt many will take the time to listen but he gives all kinds of reasons why he believes there is a strong possibility that such a thing just might happen.. I am a fence sitter (10% maybe and 90% it will not happen) as far as any kind major American armed conflict happening however, I am far removed from the states and can only get my news from articles and places like ATS.. So members of ATS might have a different take on the whole thing. youtu.be...
War (from inside) has already started and will soon fill out onto the streets meanwhile our enemies approach in stealth due to mass distraction and will strike USA with its pants down.
It does not take a prophet to see this happening.........
DS