It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Why? Because she dared defend a woman who was
fired simply for expressing a defense of biological
reality.
Forstater, 45, was employed as a tax expert at the
Center for Global Development, a British think tank.
In 2018, her organization fired her after she posted
comments on Twitter that criticized the
U.K. government’s plans to let people self-identify
according to the gender they choose.
tweet..."My belief as i set out in my witness statement
Is that sex is a biological fact & is immutable.
There are two sexes. Men are male. Women are female.
It is impossible to change sex. These were until very
recently understood as basic facts of life"
originally posted by: dfnj2015
a reply to: radarloveguy
This is patently false: "There are two sexes. Men are male. Women are female."
Just google "porn shemales". This is really kind of dumb post not taking into account reality.
originally posted by: dfnj2015
a reply to: radarloveguy
This is patently false: "There are two sexes. Men are male. Women are female."
Just google "porn shemales". This is really kind of dumb post not taking into account reality.
originally posted by: ChaoticOrder
a reply to: dfnj2015
Shemales are still biological men, a DNA test will always show that. There is a genetic mutation which can result in a person being born with both genitalia, that is the closest things to a 3rd gender. Personally I don't really see much issue with letting a male call themselves a female if they are quite feminine, what annoys me is when bulked up hairy idiots try to play into it.
originally posted by: ColeYounger
a reply to: dfnj2015
Don't you think the woman had the right to say what she said? Do you think her being fired is justified?
originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: radarloveguy
Just because someone, somewhere in the world, out there on the Internet, says something weird. It isn't a worldwide 'leftist' conspiracy.
The internet is full of kooks. Ditto to those who fly off the handle in moral outrage at unseen and vague 'opponents'.
Honestly, the number of these posts accusing 'leftist' or 'liberals' or other similar anonymous group says more about those who post them and the nature of the 'sources'.
But don't worry, because it will get re-posted and commented and cross-posted and opinionized to death and that then makes it real.
originally posted by: ChaoticOrder
a reply to: dfnj2015
Shemales are still biological men, a DNA test will always show that. There is a genetic mutation which can result in a person being born with both genitalia, that is the closest things to a 3rd gender. Personally I don't really see much issue with letting a male call themselves a female if they are quite feminine, what annoys me is when bulked up hairy idiots try to play into it.
It seems to me we need to create some clear separations between biological gender and self-assigned gender. It's fine if they want to identify as another gender but they need to realize they are still biologically a certain gender, and that's very important information when it comes to things like medical records, otherwise they simply cannot receive the most appropriate treatment.