It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Iran's Threats of Revenge are Beyond Foolish

page: 10
44
<< 7  8  9   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 6 2020 @ 11:24 AM
link   
a reply to: Thecakeisalie



Aren't you forgetting Iran has the backing of two little nations known as Rusky and chinwah?


You mean Russia with the GDP of Italy? How much Trade does China do with Iran?

Neither will do much if we really want to take down Iran. Iran will be lonely if the fireworks start.

It's not in their own self interest to do that. How did Russia help Iraq back in the day?


edit on 6-1-2020 by pavil because: (no reason given)




posted on Jan, 6 2020 @ 07:28 PM
link   
If the US pulls out of the middle east here is what the outcome will be, eventually.

By as early as 2040 Iran will have taken over much of Iraq and essentially the two former enemy's will then be one nation, they will become a super power in control of oil and other resources, there army will grow to sizes not seen in our age and meanwhile the European defense force will fail to reach it's target size, Europe will be ripe for the picking.

By maybe as early as 2060 a nuclear armed middle eastern super power will lead a Muslim coalition to invade Europe, sacking Rome and reaching as far as France and Germany, Britain despite being English speaking will be home to many millions of British born if not Ethnic British Muslim's, the US will have lost it's global dominance to a rising China whom will by this point have mended there relations with the Middle East for there own vested interests and formed trade relations with the new super power as will India whom will find itself surrounded.

A religiously inspired Muslim army will during the invasion of Europe storm the Vatican city killing or taking prisoner the few Swiss guards to try to stop them and the pope of the Catholic's at that time will be murdered by them, a bishop will lead a mass for the dead in defiance of there rule on the hill that is all that will remain of the site among the ruins and be machine gunned by the same invading Islamic militia (Sparking angry mobs to seek justice against Islamic minority's in south america and other places in the world and triggering an age of dark anger, black smoke and seemingly endless war).

But if American stay's it's course, put's and end to the threat Iran poses NOW before it is too late then this may be averted at least for another hundred or so years.

edit on 6-1-2020 by LABTECH767 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 6 2020 @ 08:20 PM
link   




posted on Jan, 7 2020 @ 08:00 AM
link   

originally posted by: pavil
I think it's Iran who will be surprised by our asymmetrical warfare.

Exactly. The point being, there is no need for boots on the ground to keep them in check until their own population grows tired of the radical leadership and overthrows them.



posted on Jan, 7 2020 @ 12:07 PM
link   

originally posted by: JBurns
I can't figure out what is better, putting our mortal enemies in their place or the left's now we'll documented support for Iran in a time of conflict

Thankfully the chants of Death to America and death to Israel coupled with recent threats and attacks gives us all the cards.

This must be the last American killed by Iran, ever, or we should leave Iran's leadership in buckets and put them out of the oil business for good.


Typical American sheep.

Who was allied with the Taliban in 70s and 80s? (Afghanistan)

USA

Who trained up Osama Bin Laden?

USA

Who was allied with Saddam Hussein in the 80s? (Iraq)

USA

Who was allied with Gaddafi in pursuit of Al Queda in North Africa?

USA



Solemani was an Iranian general who helped USA during it's fight with ISIS in Iraq. He's just another ally that the US turned against.


Where is the proof that Solemani was responsible for any American deaths?

Is the proof from the Pentagon?

The same people who have trillions missing?
The same people who told you that Saddam had weapons of Mass Destruction?

Now they are saying Iran was responsible for 9/11.

The whole thing is a complete farce.



posted on Jan, 7 2020 @ 12:11 PM
link   

originally posted by: LABTECH767
If the US pulls out of the middle east here is what the outcome will be, eventually.

By as early as 2040 Iran will have taken over much of Iraq and essentially the two former enemy's will then be one nation, they will become a super power in control of oil and other resources, there army will grow to sizes not seen in our age and meanwhile the European defense force will fail to reach it's target size, Europe will be ripe for the picking.


1.) Europe would have never had a problem with immigrants in the first place if

*USA didn't help take out Gadafi and Libya
*USA didn't destroy Iraq creating a vacuum for ISIS to fill.

2.) USA will never pull out of the middle-east until every country surrounding Israel is fragmented. Making Israel the strongest in the region, and ultimately expanding to the land that it wants.



posted on Jan, 10 2020 @ 07:34 AM
link   
a reply to: Debunkology

Good God man while you do have a definite point that is only SOME of Europe, there are whole Muslim Enclaves within France, the UK, Germany, the Netherland's, Sweden and many other places were people have been here and are now third and fourth generation Muslim migrant's and there descendant's from long before those conflict's began.

We in Britain can trace our growing Muslim population back to India and the period known as Partition.

France had a very long lasting north African enclave and indeed Spain still does have such.

A lot of these nation's that formed ties to these parts of the world have of course as a result developed large populations of Muslims.

In fact my home town Liverpool is regarded as having the earliest known mosque in the country founded by an English convert to that religion, though there are probably earlier one's as we are an island and many visitors over the century's have come to our shores, many merchant's have lived in our city's from many nations,. Long before we even had an empire there were Black probably west African merchant's living in London and who knows what religion they may have had but it is a good bet that they were probably Muslims.

The difference today is the scale of the migration, the excuses being used such as claiming we will need them due to our aging population - the same over in Japan whom now stand the lose there own culture as the migrant community's there have started to grow.

In fact in my own lifetime back in the 1970's and early 1980's I remember our school's being Crowded, most classroom's jam packed with kid's, no room to even play in the school playground as there were so many of us, Christian song's sang at morning assembly in a state school.

There are claim's our falling birth rate is down to a chance in culture but those are bunk, culture follows people not on the whole the other way around (though people are sheep to a degree as any corrupt politician knows), rather the falling birth rate is probably down to a clandestine program to reduce our population by certain group's whom may even have believed they were doing the right thing, patently they were not but that is another debate.

So to make up the short fall of our own kid's that are now not being born the ELITE not the common man had to look elsewhere and were better than to open the door's to migrant's (in there mind's but once again not in the minds of any right minded person - charity begins' at home you look after your own first - but then this was not charity they need workers and slaves to keep there positions and if there are not enough of us then they have to find them from somewhere else don't they and our nation, culture and identity be damned as long as they keep there illegitimate positions of power).



new topics

top topics



 
44
<< 7  8  9   >>

log in

join