It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Disturbed Deliverer
It's amazing how the Democrats can try and deny problems with the Social Security plan when they themselves were trying to reform it just years before...
This plan is a 2 trillion dollar Wall Street windfall
New information turned up by FactCheck.org shows that the type of private Social Security accounts being proposed by President Bush would yield very little profit to the securities industry, contrary to persistent claims of a potentially huge "windfall" to Wall Street.
What we have discovered is that the model for Bush's accounts -- the Federal Thrift Savings Plan for federal workers -- actually paid securities firms a net total of only 16 cents for every $10,000 in workers accounts. The TSP had refused to make that information public -- until now. It shows that fees actually being paid to Wall Street are hundreds of times smaller than some critics had assumed.
For that reason and others we find that ads run in Louisiana by the liberal Democratic group Campaign for America's Future are grossly misleading. The group is accusing Republican Rep. James McCrery, who is chairman of the Social Security subcommittee and a supporter of Bush's private accounts, of "corruption" for accepting campaign donations from Wall Street, which it falsely claims will "profit most" from private accounts.
Originally posted by sardion2000
How is 16 cents for every 10 grand a "Windfall"??
Originally posted by brimstone735
Originally posted by sardion2000
How is 16 cents for every 10 grand a "Windfall"??
That's IF Bush sticks with the Federal Thrift Savings Plan. If investors are allowed to choose their investment funds, then Wall Street will see record profits.
Originally posted by Disturbed Deliverer
I fail to see why people shouldn't be allowed to plan for their retirement the way they see fit. They work their entire lives for it, why shouldn't they call the shots?
What Bush is suggesting is the best way. Hate to tell people this, but privatization is inevitable.
Originally posted by marg6043
If the administration only target younger generation until 40 to do the cuts and leave the over 40 with just a choice I will be all for it.
But reality strike is us the ones he is going to screw up because we have money in the pot.
I can tell you exactly why. There is a concept of "risk tolerance" in the investment science. If you are an aggressive investor, you tolerance is high, the higher the reward and the higher the risk.
This is a plot which will be disasterous for everyone. I do hope it fails.
Raising the age the benifit starts by a couple of years, and raising the tax by a small percentage.
Originally posted by Disturbed Deliverer
I can tell you exactly why. There is a concept of "risk tolerance" in the investment science. If you are an aggressive investor, you tolerance is high, the higher the reward and the higher the risk.
It is THEIR money. Why are you telling them what to do with it? If they want to take risks, they can. They're not hurting anyone but themselves. It's their choice. You can't tell adults what to do with their lives.