It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

-@TH3WH17ERABB17- -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART- -23-

page: 22
157
<< 19  20  21    23  24  25 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 4 2020 @ 08:34 AM
link   
I have questions about the ring that was found on the disarticulated hand of the dead Iranian terrorist general.
I thought Muslims were not supposed to wear jewelry.
I have noticed that other high ranking Iranians wear a very similar ring.




posted on Jan, 4 2020 @ 08:44 AM
link   
The babbling threats from “some” Iranian factions are comical.



posted on Jan, 4 2020 @ 08:49 AM
link   
a reply to: carewemust

It's like he just blew up overnight



posted on Jan, 4 2020 @ 08:50 AM
link   

originally posted by: butcherguy
I have questions about the ring that was found on the disarticulated hand of the dead Iranian terrorist general.
I thought Muslims were not supposed to wear jewelry.
I have noticed that other high ranking Iranians wear a very similar ring.



Can men wear any jewelry in Islam? The answer is : No, except for a silver ring which weighs less than 4.235 grams.

The Prophet (peace be upon him) used to wear a silver ring in his pinky finger with an Abyssinian stone in it. And, he would make the stone face his palm.

The ring can be worn in the pinky finger of your right or your left hand. In Shafi’i fiqh, wearing the ring in your right hand is considered to be better. Most scholars think that the stone in Prophet’s ring was carnelian (aqiq).


moazzam-khan.com...



posted on Jan, 4 2020 @ 09:04 AM
link   
a reply to: IAMTAT

It is possible that these red stones in the rings are carnelian.
But the weight of the rings seems to be exceeding the prophets rule (a US nickel coin weighs 5 grams). Plus they aren’t wearing them on the pinky and the stone is facing outward.
They better be careful or they might not get the 70 virgins and whatnot.

edit on b000000312020-01-04T09:16:44-06:0009America/ChicagoSat, 04 Jan 2020 09:16:44 -0600900000020 by butcherguy because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 4 2020 @ 09:27 AM
link   

originally posted by: butcherguy
a reply to: IAMTAT

It is possible that these red stones in the rings are carnelian.
But the weight of the rings seems to be exceeding the prophets rule (a US nickel coin weighs 5 grams). Plus they aren’t wearing them on the pinky and the stone is facing outward.
They better be careful or they might not get the 70 virgins and whatnot.


Soleimani is gonna find it difficult to enjoy those 70 virgins without his salami.



posted on Jan, 4 2020 @ 09:33 AM
link   
OK getting a bit better
Oregon Congressional Candidate Places Electoral Hopes on QAnon

www.rightwingwatch.org...



posted on Jan, 4 2020 @ 09:38 AM
link   
a reply to: IAMTAT

Wasn't Osiris or one of them castrated and some goddess gave him another? Maybe Tulsi will cough it up... Then we know we're in trouble.



posted on Jan, 4 2020 @ 09:42 AM
link   
a reply to: IAMTAT

Figures carnelian is going to open up a rabbit hole to look down lol

Talking along the lines of being no coincidences to this timeline


Carnelian
Properties, Meanings, Powers & Uses


There is some dispute as to whether the name Carnelian is derived from a Latin word meaning “flesh”, or a Latin word meaning “cherry”….but in either case, they reference those colors that which the stone exhibits.
Ancient Egyptians carried it on and about their bodies as a source of constant renewal and vitality. It was also told that in the Egyptian Book of the Dead that Carnelian was placed in tombs as “magic armor” for life after death.

Merchants often used Carnelian to craft ‘seal rings’ for royalty and the upper classes, as it will separate easily from wax and clay.  The ancients often believed that Carnelian was good for combating a bad temper, such as anger that was thought to be the product of black magic..... 




edit on 142020 by MetalThunder because: 63668794 6:11



posted on Jan, 4 2020 @ 09:46 AM
link   
a reply to: Tileman

Barry might also be able to regurgitate a new one for him. He protected the hell out of Soleimani for years.

Thanks to the 'Ginsu Missile'...it's no fun to enter Paradise without one's naughty bits intact.



posted on Jan, 4 2020 @ 09:49 AM
link   
No way any of the current leaders of the Dem candidates is going to be their runner. The underdog, voice of "reason", with a nice ass, is going to be their beast and our burden.



https://__._/podesta-emails/emailid/54421

edit on 1 4 2020 by Tileman because: (no reason given)

edit on 1 4 2020 by Tileman because: added link and then tried to fix it



posted on Jan, 4 2020 @ 09:57 AM
link   

originally posted by: MetalThunder
a reply to: IAMTAT

Figures carnelian is going to open up a rabbit hole to look down lol

Talking along the lines of being no coincidences to this timeline



CORN ready for Harvesting?


Although now the more common term, "carnelian" is a 16th-century corruption of the 14th-century word "cornelian" (and its associated orthographies corneline and cornalyn).[10] Cornelian, cognate with similar words in several Romance languages, comes from the Mediaeval Latin corneolus, itself derived from the Latin word cornum, the cornel cherry,[

en.wikipedia.org...



posted on Jan, 4 2020 @ 09:59 AM
link   
To anyone wondering what a military vs. military offensive between the USA and Iran would look like....it would be a massacre if we so felt like it. Their Air Force is absolutely no match for ours. They still fly US built F-4’s and F-5’s, and apparently a handful of F-14 Tomcats used to defend their nuclear sites...still ancient jets as far as we are concerned (that’s what Tom Cruise flew in Top Gun). Also Soviet Union built SU 24s. They have around 9 new jets which are their own design built off the F-4. Probably comparable to a US 4th generation fighter. We would decimate them via the air and with cruise missiles lobbbed from our ships off the coast. It would be over quickly with very few actual boots on the ground (Spec Ops only). They DO have the S-400 from Russia, and that poses a problem, but we have ways around that.
edit on 4-1-2020 by PokeyJoe because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 4 2020 @ 09:59 AM
link   
a reply to: IAMTAT

TAT, lovely little proof from /qresearch on Soleimani from POTUS flag tweet just after he was killed:

Check out the size of the USA Flag DJT posted!

POTUS flag tweet

Picture dimensions = 220 x 116

Mirror and Flip!

911 5:5

WE WILL NEVER FORGET!
WE WILL NEVER FORGIVE!


Now think back to POTUS Anti-Benghazi tweet on Dec 31st! Think ANTI-virus/ANTI-biotic... was POTUS signalling payback for Benghazi? Q3724 says:

We the people are the cure.



1) We have learnt Soleimani was involved in both 911 (helping perps escape) and in Benghazi,
2) POTUS tweets Anti-Benghazi before Soleimani was killed,
3) POTUS tweets 5:5 911 flag after Soleimani was killed!

4) Further note that the Anti-Benghazi tweet had the typo AH corrected to HA!
a) original tweet time was 04:29... Q429 includes the following resignations:

Oman Air CEO Paul Gregorowitsch - Oct. 16, 2017
Red Cross Texas Gulf Coast Region CEO David Brady - Oct. 28, 2017
El Al CEO David Maimon - Nov. 8, 2017
TravelCenters of America LLC CEO Thomas O'Brien - Nov. 30, 2017
NYPD Police Chief Carlos Gomez retires - Dec. 22, 2017
Alphabet Executive Chairman Eric Schmidt - Dec. 22, 2017

Had these all been linked to Soleimani's involvement in 911, helping perps escape?

b) corrected time was 4:38... Q438 includes stringer EYE OF RA:
Does EYE OF RA refer to Soleimani's and HRC's rings?

edit on 4-1-2020 by RelSciHistItSufi because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 4 2020 @ 10:03 AM
link   
a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi

Just like Al-Baghdadi was killed by dogs...Soleimani was 'sliced & diced'. These are intentionally 'special' deaths...reserved for special villains.

It seems, in Islam, dog's mouths (and their saliva) are considered to be 'impure'...requiring a special purification ritual being performed on the dead after being killed by dogs.

Dying in an 'impure' state will render the dead unable to enter 'Paradise'.
edit on 4-1-2020 by IAMTAT because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 4 2020 @ 10:10 AM
link   
a reply to: MetalThunder

MT, you've just detailed the link between Carnelian rings and EYE OF RA?

Q437 and Q438:

These refer to HRC's SAP program access - DID HRC provide SAPS to Soleimani?

Recall the black and white photos of a young Hillary wearing a ring like Soleimani's - was hers RED also? It looks very similar to Soleimani's!

Q291 Hillary's ring like Soleimani's:

!ITPb.qbhqo
8 Dec 2017 - 12:51:13 AM

0704911B-FBA8-4DE7-9C53-9….jpeg

03821C90-07E4-4906-B30D-A….jpeg



NOTE that timestamp seconds from Q291 encodes Jan 3rd... date of taking out Soleimani!
edit on 4-1-2020 by RelSciHistItSufi because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 4 2020 @ 10:13 AM
link   
a reply to: PokeyJoe

PokeyJoe, concur. In air and naval terms, it would be no contest. Iran is a big country so trying an overland offensive there would be ill advised. Again, their land forces could be knocked out easily, but then it becomes a much larger version of Iraq with all of the pacification issues thereby implied. Not sure if knocking the clergy out of power would be wise; it might become another Libya kind of situation with warlords and rival clan armies all over the place. It has been too long since 1979 to expect anything like a calmer regime made up of ex-Shah officials to replace the clergy.

Machiavelli told us to either pick up a defeated enemy and make them your friend, or to finish them off. But in the case of Islamic countries, neither option seems recommended.

May be best to just knock out their most effective weapons and their atomic program and keep a sharp eye on them thereafter.

Cheers



posted on Jan, 4 2020 @ 10:20 AM
link   
a reply to: F2d5thCavv2

I think that would be the plan. Overwhelm their military facilities and equipment and neuter their offensive capability. No occupation. Let the Iranian people uprise and overthrow the Mullahs themselves (with a little push from us, of course.)



posted on Jan, 4 2020 @ 10:39 AM
link   

originally posted by: F2d5thCavv2
a reply to: PokeyJoe

PokeyJoe, concur. In air and naval terms, it would be no contest. Iran is a big country so trying an overland offensive there would be ill advised. Again, their land forces could be knocked out easily, but then it becomes a much larger version of Iraq with all of the pacification issues thereby implied. Not sure if knocking the clergy out of power would be wise; it might become another Libya kind of situation with warlords and rival clan armies all over the place. It has been too long since 1979 to expect anything like a calmer regime made up of ex-Shah officials to replace the clergy.

Machiavelli told us to either pick up a defeated enemy and make them your friend, or to finish them off. But in the case of Islamic countries, neither option seems recommended.

May be best to just knock out their most effective weapons and their atomic program and keep a sharp eye on them thereafter.

Cheers


There would be no strategic purpose in a full-on land invasion, just like there wasn't in Iraq and Afghanistan, and look how that turned out. Tactical invasions of certain militarily important targets that can't be otherwise bombed, maybe.

Our objective would be to knock out their ability to extent their military presence beyond their own self defense. Unfortunately, in today's world where everyone and everywhere is a target, that's getting more difficult.
edit on 4-1-2020 by LanceCorvette because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 4 2020 @ 10:53 AM
link   
a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi

Symbolism ... Perhaps

Wonder if this s indication of the key stone .... A lot of thoughts firing up lol

edit on 142020 by MetalThunder because: Clean up on isle. 777



new topics

top topics



 
157
<< 19  20  21    23  24  25 >>

log in

join