It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Our Suns Binary and Spiritual Second Sun (Coverup)

page: 4
107
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 1 2020 @ 01:04 PM
link   

originally posted by: Raggedyman

originally posted by: KKLOCO
a reply to: Gothmog

Actually, it’s a known fact that the majority of star systems are binary. With the second highest being trinary. The least common is singular star systems.


Ok but do any of them interlink their orbits?
How, why?
That’s very strange
How would gravity cause that?
Separate gravity fields

I don’t know, seems outlandish
Heres the issue, nobody is speaking in absolutes. A preponderance of evidence from a particular perspective has been being discussed and memorialized throughout millenia.

It meets some folks sniff test for further inquiry.




posted on Jan, 1 2020 @ 01:04 PM
link   
That was a very interesting OP; thanks.

So besides the very short paragraph about density of spirituality which you didn't elaborate much on, i don't understand the significance of the revelation that our star system is part of a binary system.

If I understand your op correctly the last color shift of the star occurred 2k years ago; and with a 24k cycle that means we are at nearly the farthest point in the cycle and it won't be for another 8k -10k years until the star is back in the neighborhood. Now that would be a sight to see; and that would explain ancient mythology.

But what does it mean to us today?



posted on Jan, 1 2020 @ 01:04 PM
link   
a reply to: BlueJacket

So you are not going to answer why either, cool



posted on Jan, 1 2020 @ 01:04 PM
link   
a reply to: Raggedyman

All binary and trinary star systems have a link to their orbits. Some of them are bizarre orbits at that. Everything in our universe is connected in a way.

Everything is a micro of a macro. As above, so below.



posted on Jan, 1 2020 @ 01:05 PM
link   

originally posted by: TrustedTruth

originally posted by: BlueJacket

originally posted by: Raggedyman

originally posted by: carsforkids
a reply to: Raggedyman




Seems a wild fantasy without a reason to justify your belief


This question is answered in the OP but I'm not sure even Purp
truly understands what is being hidden. Look at the thread again
if you will. It's in plain site.


Sorry CfK, strikes me as nothing more than esoteric psychobabble for the reasons I stated
I am not going to be swayed by public opinion and a good story and it’s not a good story

Every one knows wrestling is fake but people are still invested into the show.
Billions of people throughout the last couple thousand years bought into one story or another to describe the very same thing. Its the value and association attributed to the "story" that lends it validity, or not.


And you'll find languages across the planet often share similar base root words. Many of them originated in one place and throughout time, changed, but kept a similar phonetic sound.

Could not it be considered the same for 'stories' told to explain the night sky?

Or origin stories?
Sure could. Why not investigate all of them?



posted on Jan, 1 2020 @ 01:06 PM
link   
a reply to: Raggedyman




If Sirius has horns prepare for war? Is that from Harry Potter?


No not at all. Why ask you interested in mythlogy and symbolism in films. I think everyone should be otherwise you are worshiping Gods without even knowing you are doing it. Pretty ignorant eh! :-)

Glad your not in that boat.

:-)

Here is the three headed dog in Harry Potter



It is based on the greek three headed dog



Its called Cerberus: (sounds a bit like Sirius doesnt it. !

Well Cerberus is the protector of the underworld. Very much like in Harry Potter where it protects the trap door to the basment.

Cerberus is based on Anubis. The Egyptain God Dog that escorts you to the underworld.

Have you ever wondered what the Owl represents in Harry Potter.



posted on Jan, 1 2020 @ 01:06 PM
link   

originally posted by: KKLOCO
a reply to: Gothmog

Actually, it’s a known fact that the majority of star systems are binary. With the second highest being trinary. The least common is singular star systems.

Read again...
From the small part of the universe we can observe.
Why do folks leave stuff out ?



posted on Jan, 1 2020 @ 01:07 PM
link   

originally posted by: Raggedyman
a reply to: BlueJacket

So you are not going to answer why either, cool

It's a "Sitchin" thing.



posted on Jan, 1 2020 @ 01:07 PM
link   

originally posted by: BlueJacket

originally posted by: Raggedyman

originally posted by: KKLOCO
a reply to: Gothmog

Actually, it’s a known fact that the majority of star systems are binary. With the second highest being trinary. The least common is singular star systems.


Ok but do any of them interlink their orbits?
How, why?
That’s very strange
How would gravity cause that?
Separate gravity fields

I don’t know, seems outlandish
Heres the issue, nobody is speaking in absolutes. A preponderance of evidence from a particular perspective has been being discussed and memorialized throughout millenia.

It meets some folks sniff test for further inquiry.


So no coverup as the op title suggests, just ignorance

Why cover this up, who is covering it up, what’s being hidden

That’s the issue I asked why about, not what you are implying



posted on Jan, 1 2020 @ 01:09 PM
link   
a reply to: BlueJacket

Thank you for your replies.




posted on Jan, 1 2020 @ 01:10 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gothmog

originally posted by: Raggedyman
a reply to: BlueJacket

So you are not going to answer why either, cool

It's a "Sitchin" thing.


Ah so Sitchin is covering it up, finally falling into place
Thanks GM, explains it all now, Sitchin is a mastermind
👍😬



posted on Jan, 1 2020 @ 01:11 PM
link   
a reply to: Raggedyman




Why cover this up, who is covering it up, what’s being hidden That’s the issue I asked why about, not what you are implying


Is it worth answering that question when you dont belief there is anything to hide. If you want to actually have a debate with someone you need to have a grasp of both sides of the argument. In this repsect you are lacking a little.



posted on Jan, 1 2020 @ 01:12 PM
link   
a reply to: Raggedyman




h so Sitchin is covering it up, finally falling into place Thanks GM, explains it all now, Sitchin is a mastermind



Why dont you try caslibrating Stichens dates against a 24/26k year yuga cycle and you will see they match perfectly.


and then afterwards comment to what this might actually mean.



posted on Jan, 1 2020 @ 01:13 PM
link   
a reply to: purplemer

No, not interested in dogs, Potter or owls, I asked about Sirius and horns re war

Is there a war coming, is that being hidden, is Sitchin covering that up as well?



posted on Jan, 1 2020 @ 01:13 PM
link   
a reply to: purplemer

Love this thought provoking thread but have to point out that this pic is photoshopped:



No Pi symbols on the hands in the original!


edit on 1-1-2020 by MindBodySpiritComplex because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 1 2020 @ 01:15 PM
link   
a reply to: BlueJacket




It meets some folks sniff test for further inquiry.

And it shouldn't .




posted on Jan, 1 2020 @ 01:15 PM
link   

originally posted by: Raggedyman
a reply to: BlueJacket

So you are not going to answer why either, cool


Heres some thoughts on the matter. Most peoples understanding of gravity is quite low.
www.quora.com...

Mine included



posted on Jan, 1 2020 @ 01:15 PM
link   

originally posted by: Raggedyman

originally posted by: BlueJacket

originally posted by: Raggedyman

originally posted by: KKLOCO
a reply to: Gothmog

Actually, it’s a known fact that the majority of star systems are binary. With the second highest being trinary. The least common is singular star systems.


Ok but do any of them interlink their orbits?
How, why?
That’s very strange
How would gravity cause that?
Separate gravity fields

I don’t know, seems outlandish
Heres the issue, nobody is speaking in absolutes. A preponderance of evidence from a particular perspective has been being discussed and memorialized throughout millenia.

It meets some folks sniff test for further inquiry.


So no coverup as the op title suggests, just ignorance

Why cover this up, who is covering it up, what’s being hidden

That’s the issue I asked why about, not what you are implying


I think the OP’s choice of words ‘cover up’ is not what she was intending. I think a better choice of words would be ‘Not educating us on it’.

The reason they keep it hidden, is for the same reason the ruling elite class have done so for thousands of years — control. They want us to be dense dumb idiots, working our lives away so we can pay them taxes and maintain their power.

If all the sudden, all the mysteries were revealed to us about EVERYTHING in the universe, do you really think everyone would keep on with their lives the same way? The answer is no. People would grow more harmonious and less fearful. They can’t have that cuz they need our fear to maintain their power.



posted on Jan, 1 2020 @ 01:19 PM
link   

originally posted by: Raggedyman

originally posted by: BlueJacket

originally posted by: Raggedyman

originally posted by: KKLOCO
a reply to: Gothmog

Actually, it’s a known fact that the majority of star systems are binary. With the second highest being trinary. The least common is singular star systems.


Ok but do any of them interlink their orbits?
How, why?
That’s very strange
How would gravity cause that?
Separate gravity fields

I don’t know, seems outlandish
Heres the issue, nobody is speaking in absolutes. A preponderance of evidence from a particular perspective has been being discussed and memorialized throughout millenia.

It meets some folks sniff test for further inquiry.


So no coverup as the op title suggests, just ignorance

Why cover this up, who is covering it up, what’s being hidden

That’s the issue I asked why about, not what you are implying
I didnt say that...ignorance is a great vehicle for control, no?



posted on Jan, 1 2020 @ 01:20 PM
link   

originally posted by: MindBodySpiritComplex
a reply to: purplemer

Love this thought provoking thread but have to point out that this pic is photoshopped:



No Pi symbols on the hands in the original!

yeah considering PI is a Greek symbol, not Egyptian



new topics

top topics



 
107
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join