It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: cherokeetroy
a reply to: Justoneman
Speaking of those who control us, here are a few low frequency institutions that will no longer be necessary (except to those who want them) in the future:
Banks
Hospitals
Schools
Churches
What will humans do with all that extra space once these programs are no longer running the show
Do you honestly believe in an apocalyptic scenario that resembles the story of noahs ark and sets up a new age for the human race?
originally posted by: cherokeetroy
another observation about 'facts ' ..
facts are a compilation of data that were collected from the past. That's all they are. But what was true in the past doesn't matter. What matters is what is relevant now. Because every new moment is created in/from the now. So the question is..."what is true now? " and the answer is what do you prefer to be true? Something from the past? or would you prefer to choose something different (or better)
The Homann’ s 20-y ear experiment, measuring the earth’ s daily rotation time relative to the star Sirius, detected changes in the earth’ s rotation period when Sirius B passed between earth and Sirius A. If such a phenomenon can noticeably affect the earth’ s rotation, then it is logical to assume that the action of this nearby star system might also affect the entire solar system, especially the minor planets at the edge of the solar system
"In less than five years from today, everything you have ever known will be wiped from the face of the earth, washed out to sea or buried deep in mud, volcanic ash, and lava. The landscape of the entire planet will change. And you and everyone you have ever known will be dead, fish food or buried deep in the same mud, volcanic ash, and lava. Gone. Erased from history. Never to be remembered. As if you never even existed.
I think without realising it Science and the laws of Physics are not as objective as one might think. They are to extent based on our cultural and political values as a species. For example you can draw strong parallels between the present theories of evolution and capitalism. (Or fraud-ism and Sex) As an ecologists I can say that natural systems to not function on such simple terms and the mechanisms for energy transfer are not so simple and are more cooperative than made out to be.
The Homann’ s 20-y ear experiment, measuring the earth’ s daily rotation time relative to the star Sirius, detected changes in the earth’ s rotation period when Sirius B passed between earth and Sirius A. If such a phenomenon can noticeably affect the earth’ s rotation, then it is logical to assume that the action of this nearby star system might also affect the entire solar system, especially the minor planets at the edge of the solar system
In briefest summary... Sirius B passes "in front of" Sirius A as an alignment in line of sight with Earth about every 50 years. Last time that happened the Homann fixed telescope observed the alignment simultaneously with a precisely recorded slowing of Earth's rate of rotation... This for several weeks of slowing as the alignment approached and several weeks of speeding back up again after the alignment passed. Obviously, since the visible alignment images traveling at lightspeed were simultaneous with the precisely measured slowing of Earth's rate of rotation, this is extremely confirming evidence that the force of gravity travels at lightspeed.
They have found two very interesting results: 1) The Earth's rotation period relative to this star is in alignment with the tropical year, not the sidereal year, and 2) when Sirius B went in front of Serius A in 1989 (relative to Earth, as it does every 50 years), the Earth's spin rate slowed down, losing a full second per day for a period of several weeks before the event-- and then speeded up, gaining a second per day for several weeks after the event.
That said, please keep in mind that the above is about a *change* in gravitational force on Earth... that the extremely massive neutron star, Sirius B, in direct alignment with its binary partner, actually increased the gravitational pull on earth, measured as a slowing of rate of rotation.
To start, the research team of geologists analyzed every earthquake to occur since 1900 at a magnitude above 7.0. They were looking for trends in the occurrence of large earthquakes. What they found is that roughly every 32 years there was an uptick in the number of significant earthquakes worldwide.
The team was puzzled as to the root cause of this cyclicity in earthquake rate. They compared it with a number of global historical datasets and found only one that showed a strong correlation with the uptick in earthquakes. That correlation was to the slowing down of Earth's rotation. Specifically, the team noted that around every 25-30 years Earth's rotation began to slow down and that slowdown happened just before the uptick in earthquakes. The slowing rotation historically has lasted for 5 years, with the last year triggering an increase in earthquakes.
As with many new findings in science, this story began with the data that supports the cyclical slowdown then speed up of Earth's rotation. The research team is then tasked with the "why" to explain this phenomenon. While scientists aren't exactly sure the mechanisms that produce this variation, there are a few hypotheses.
First off, Earth can't have lost a second per day for several weeks in 1989. That's insane. They think no one would notice that a day got shorter by half a minute? You could measure that with a bad wristwatch let alone all the atomic clocks and observatories around the world. Observatories were doing VLBI in the 80's. The length of a day was being measured to sub-millisecond accuracy at the time:
[graphic omitted, please refer to link below]
A day simply cannot have gotten a second shorter every day for several weeks without throwing the whole planet into apocalyptic terror.
Second, Sirius A and B are so near each other in the sky that the eclipse of one over the other can have no tidal effect on the earth. If the moon and sun which obviously have far greater gravitational impact on the earth than Sirius A and B and move across the whole celestial sphere cannot shorten a day by a second per day then Sirius obviously cannot.
Setting Sirius aside, the gravitational force has no aberration (technically, nowhere near the aberration of light) even though changes in the gravitational field propagate at the speed of light. If you look up at the sun you will see where it was 8 minutes ago. Its true, instantaneous, position is 20 arc seconds in front of where it appears to be. This is because light takes time to get here causing aberration in the apparent position of the sun. Good measurements show that the earth is accelerated toward the true, instantaneous, position of the sun rather than toward the spot that the sun appears to be.
This measured and determined fact disagrees with the reported Sirius observation. What exactly the lack of aberration of gravity means is open to interpretation. Both Newtonian gravity and General Relativity predict that gravity will not have aberration. In Newtonian gravity this is because the force of gravity is communicated instantaneously. In GR the reasons are far more complicated. They are shown here:
arxiv.org...
originally posted by: Justoneman
Here is PROOF we are being lied to like we are useless eaters.
www.youtube.com...
originally posted by: purplemer
a reply to: vethumanbeing
You know you may like some of these. His early videos are good there are some real gems of knowledge here.
He was goo until he was locked up in prison and came out a flat earther. Many have payed the price.
originally posted by: TzarChasm
a reply to: vethumanbeing
The center of the galaxy we call home, appears to be a black hole.
originally posted by: vethumanbeing
originally posted by: TzarChasm
a reply to: vethumanbeing
The center of the galaxy we call home, appears to be a black hole.
Tricky. Is the central sun Alcyone a black hole?