It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Fukushima fishermen and the National Federation of Fisheries Co-operative Associations have strongly opposed past suggestions by government officials that the water be released to the sea, warning of an “immeasurable impact on the future of the Japanese fishing industry,” with local fishermen still unable to resume full operations after the nuclear plant accident.
The water has been treated, and the plant operator, Tokyo Electric Power Co., says all 62 radioactive elements it contains can be removed to levels not harmful to humans except fortritium. There is no established method to fully separate tritium from water, but scientists say it is not a problem in small amounts. Most of the water stored at the plant still contains other radioactive elements including cancer-causing cesium and strontium and needs further treatment. In Monday’s proposal, the ministry suggested a controlled release of the water into the Pacific, allowing the water to evaporate, or a combination of the two methods. The ministry said the controlled release to the sea is the best option because it would “stably dilute and disperse” the water from the plant and can be properly monitored. A release is expected to take years and radiation levels will be kept well below the legal limit, the proposal said.
Tritiated water is a radioactive form of water where the usual protium atoms are replaced with tritium. In its pure form it may be called tritium oxide (T2O or 3H2O) or super-heavy water.
Main hazards: Corrosive (C); Radioactive
Since tritium is a low energy beta emitter, it is not dangerous externally (its beta particles are unable to penetrate the skin),[25] but it can be a radiation hazard when inhaled, ingested via food or water, or absorbed through the skin.
Tritium has leaked from 48 of 65 nuclear sites in the US. In one case, leaking water contained 7.5 microcuries (280 kBq) of tritium per litre, which is 375 times the EPA limit for drinking water.[31]
originally posted by: Bluntone22
a reply to: seeker1963
It is cleaner.
www.scientificamerican.com...
originally posted by: Bluntone22
a reply to: seeker1963
Honestly it's because people don't understand nuclear energy or radiation.
It's the boogieman...
Doom porn rules.
Since tritium is a low energy beta emitter, it is not dangerous externally (its beta particles are unable to penetrate the skin),[25] but it can be a radiation hazard when inhaled, ingested via food or water, or absorbed through the skin.
originally posted by: HalWesten
Since tritium is a low energy beta emitter, it is not dangerous externally (its beta particles are unable to penetrate the skin),[25] but it can be a radiation hazard when inhaled, ingested via food or water, or absorbed through the skin.
Which is it? Can it be absorbed through the skin or not?
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: HalWesten
Well, Cs137 from nuclear tests is still detectable, but not much to worry about.
The Pacific is wide, and deep. A whole hell of a lot of water compared to what's in the tanks at Fukushima. I won't be eating fish from the area, but I'll eat anything I manage to catch here.