impeachment ideas for the senate

Since the senate can conduct a trial any way they want, Lets hear some ideas!

bring dueling back...

Slap fight, first one to loose their teeth looses

Trump has experience wrestling, He could wrestle Pelosi

arm wrestling

Bowling for impeachment

This could also be turned into a drinking game, so it should be televised live...

put them both in a cage with a bear...

throw them out of an airplane with only one para-shoot between them...

come on lets hear your ideas..!

a reply to: 00018GE

A Senate resolution to nuke the House when it is session.

From space.

Then rebuild.

You know...

The nuclear option.

All good ideas....though don't know about the drinking game....Pelosi'd win that one hands down.

a reply to: Lumenari
Can you not just drone them?
What difference would it make, at that point.

Could not resist.

originally posted by: Oleandra88
a reply to: Lumenari
Can you not just drone them?
What difference would it make, at that point.

Could not resist.

Quoted for a perfect post.

a reply to: 00018GE

Film the entire library of TRUMP 2020 campaign ads from the Senate floor during the trial. Trust me, cheapest AND most successful reelection campaign the nation has ever seen.

a reply to: 00018GE

As long as there's no golf.

Well-known that Trump is a Cheater: of Women, of Sports, and of Man.

This could also be turned into a drinking game, so it should be televised live...

Every time Jim Jordan yells, take a shot.

Instead of a gavel at the end use this .

Bye-bye Adam

Cribbage. Trump v/ Pelosi. Nationally televised.

originally posted by: Zelun
Cribbage. Trump v/ Pelosi. Nationally televised.

I'm not sure she can count to 15.
Unfair.

originally posted by: randomtangentsrme

originally posted by: Zelun
Cribbage. Trump v/ Pelosi. Nationally televised.

I'm not sure she can count to 15.
Unfair.

You think he can without losing his train of thought and going into some unhinged tangent/rant about how numbers are a liberal conspiracy to undermine Christmas because the windmills kill Bald eagles—but if you look at them, they aren't actually bald, so that's another deep state conspiracy since the eagles need hair as good his?

a reply to: Liquesence

So now that the Dems were absolutely and completely humiliated...again...this is what you guys are going back too. Name calling. Brilliant.

originally posted by: BoscoMoney
a reply to: Liquesence

So now that the Dems were absolutely and completely humiliated...again...this is what you guys are going back too. Name calling. Brilliant.

Huh?

How have they been humiliated, and better yet, where did I call anyone a name?

Since the senate can conduct a trial any way they want

Not exactly. The Senate has to adhere to the rules that have been agreed upon by the Senate. Impeachment alone is dictated by almost 30 different rules that are pretty strict.

Despite the bloodlust of many of Trump's supporters, I don't see a majority of Senators voting to make murder the preferred method to determining an impeachment trial.

originally posted by: Liquesence

originally posted by: BoscoMoney
a reply to: Liquesence

So now that the Dems were absolutely and completely humiliated...again...this is what you guys are going back too. Name calling. Brilliant.

Huh?

How have they been humiliated, and better yet, where did I call anyone a name?

To quote you....

Well-known that Trump is a Cheater: of Women, of Sports, and of Man.

As far as Democrats being humiliated, I suggest you walk out of your left-wing echo chamber and talk to the average American.

Hint... we're dumbfounded that the left took the time to get Trump re-elected, but are pretty amazed that you really TRULY want to lose the House majority as well.

I understand why you won't understand what I just typed.

THAT is the funny part.

a reply to: Lumenari

As far as Democrats being humiliated, I suggest you walk out of your left-wing echo chamber and talk to the average American.

Or, step out of the Fox news right wing denial of reality chamber and wake up to reality. But. glad to know I'm not an average American.

I understand why you won't understand what I just typed.

Did you actually say something?

originally posted by: Xcalibur254

Since the senate can conduct a trial any way they want

Not exactly. The Senate has to adhere to the rules that have been agreed upon by the Senate. Impeachment alone is dictated by almost 30 different rules that are pretty strict.

Despite the bloodlust of many of Trump's supporters, I don't see a majority of Senators voting to make murder the preferred method to determining an impeachment trial.

You mean like the House had to adhere to the impeachment rules (see... proving high crimes and misdemeanors) and legal precedent from the last impeachments (which they did not do at all.)

No... there is no rules for the Senate for an impeachment proceeding besides that they have sole power over it and the Judicial side of our government cannot interfere with it.

Just as there no real rules for the House side of the impeachment proceedings... which is why we got a partisan hack attempt at an impeachment from said House.

As for your "blood-lust on the right" mention, it's a joke.

Which the left can't really understand because it's humor.

a reply to: Lumenari

You mean like the House had to adhere to the impeachment rules

What "rules"?

and legal precedent from the last impeachments

Obstruction of Congress? Abuse of Power?

No... there is no rules

There is no rules. lmao.

Just as there no real rules for the House side of the impeachment proceedings...

At least you admit it. Therefore, valid and Constitutional. Because: Constitution.

originally posted by: Liquesence
a reply to: Lumenari

As far as Democrats being humiliated, I suggest you walk out of your left-wing echo chamber and talk to the average American.

Or, step out of the Fox news right wing denial of reality chamber and wake up to reality. But. glad to know I'm not an average American.

I understand why you won't understand what I just typed.

Did you actually say something?

I don't watch television sweety... haven't had a cable subscription for a decade or two.

But keep assuming because you know where that gets you...

As far as me actually saying something yes I did...

And you don't understand it.

So I understand why you don't understand what I just typed.

Thank you for proving my point.