It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: [post=24835089]Boadicea[/post.
My overall opinion stays the same: The Dems who are guilty of criminal conduct in Ukraine -- and their (adult) children -- are using a sham impeachment process to prevent and/or discredit an in-depth thorough investigation of their activities by Trump/Zelensky, and want to drag this process out as long as possible to muddy the waters, while using "impeachment" against Trump (and all Republicans) in the upcoming election year. The guilty do not want a fair and just trial -- the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth -- because their own criminal corruption would be exposed for the world to see.
And I fully expect "the guilty" includes McConnell, Never Trumpers, and other sordid and sundry Republicans.
I also fully expect this is be used as a political football and dragged out as long as possible. That gridlock may be for the best. I'm happy to let We The People decide whether or not to "impeach" Trump next November.
FYI: These are the other sources used in the OP
Trump Isn’t Impeached Until the House Tells the Senate
Nixon v. United States
You were doing great...
...until the end bit where you basically said that you anyone not supporting Trump is guilty...
... of the money scheming in Ukraine.
Never forget, TDS goes both ways.
originally posted by: ATSAlex
Let's start sending this information directly to @realdonaldtrump, his family, his associates, RNC, Alex Jones, Mark Dice, OANN, FOX, CNN (they will ignore) etc.
Let's do it!
originally posted by: seagull
I still don't like him, and never will. ...and I'd vote for a good alternative in an instant...unfortunately, the Dems aren't offering anything like a good alternative. Mostly bad, and worse. So guess what? I'm going to vote for the man, all while holding my nose, come November--barring any unforeseen idiocy.
All in all though I can stomach his no filter if he keep rolling as he does.
originally posted by: Boadicea
Sometimes the filter is used to hide corruption.
I think like sexual assault that has been marginalized to mean just about anything we find that now corruption is about the same. Like SA it is now use as an assault weapon and not a shield.
When someone these days says corruption I need to really see the specifics before I jump on that bandwagon.