It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Last year, the first permitted 3D printed house in the US went up in Austin, Texas. The house was a buzz-generating proof of concept, a wacky example of the cool things tech can do. At the time, its creators—construction technologies startup ICON and housing nonprofit New Story—were raising money to fund construction of homes for low-income families in Latin America.
Now their proof of concept has turned into something much more concrete (pun intended): today, New Story announced construction of their first community of 3D printed homes, going up in Mexico’s southern state of Tabasco. There will be 50 3D printed houses once construction is complete, the first two of which were unveiled today.
At 500 square feet apiece, the houses aren’t terribly large, but they each have two bedrooms, a living room, kitchen, and bathroom. Houses are printed in around 24 hours’ time using a printer called the Vulcan II.
originally posted by: BlueJacket
a reply to: 727Sky
Government funded?
I love the idea of providing homes for the less fortunate, but not the less motivated at all.
I entirely reject the notion of "Government funded."
There is no such thing.
originally posted by: ElGoobero
thanks for posting
really really interesting
I wonder if this is the future of housing, at least low-income
would like one of these myself
originally posted by: AaarghZombies
originally posted by: BlueJacket
a reply to: 727Sky
Government funded?
I love the idea of providing homes for the less fortunate, but not the less motivated at all.
I entirely reject the notion of "Government funded."
There is no such thing.
If i had to choose between being afraid to go into certain area after dark because of the transients, or paying extra tax so that the state can given them basic accommodation, i know which i would choose.
Sometimes getting the state to clean things up is the least worst solution.
Its like choosing to give junkies free rehab. If it gets a percentage of them off of the streets for a tolerable amount of money its better than having them among the regular populace, and it might just clean a few of them up.
originally posted by: ElGoobero
thanks for posting
really really interesting
I wonder if this is the future of housing, at least low-income
would like one of these myself