It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Is Joseph Mifsud dead or working with Durham on his investigation?

page: 2
11
<< 1   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 21 2019 @ 12:05 PM
link   
a reply to: UKTruth

This abbreviated timeline shows when Mifsud began to act. CIA Director John Brennan/State Department/DNI Director James Clapper, and MI6//Five Eyes. >>>>> Note especially the 14 and 15 March events




posted on Dec, 21 2019 @ 12:14 PM
link   
Here's another video of Mifsud speaking if anyone wants to compare it against the audio that the Italian media has released...




posted on Dec, 21 2019 @ 12:20 PM
link   

originally posted by: Deetermined

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: UKTruth

Joseph Mifsud met with Durham's team this past Summer (2019).

www.washingtontimes.com...

Unlike the Washington Post, the Washington Times has a good reputation.


Based on your link, it looks like Durham's team met with Mifsud's attorney who only played a recording for them of Mifsud that was recorded in May 2018.


Durham is combing through former CIA Director John Brennan's communications and documents. He'll get to the bottom of things. As William Barr said last week, "These things take time".

Personally, I would prefer Durham just go to Clapper and ask him about the meeting where Obama gave the order to Spy on the Trump campaign. Work from the top-down.



posted on Dec, 21 2019 @ 12:29 PM
link   
a reply to: carewemust

Personally, I would prefer that Brennan and Clapper be the last two people that Durham interviews so he can use all other testimony and documentation as ammunition against them while questioning them for their responses. It would be interesting to see how they are questioned. Do they just let them hang themselves or do they point out inconsistencies during their questioning? Or will they save all that to surprise them with at trial?



posted on Dec, 21 2019 @ 12:48 PM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: Deetermined

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: UKTruth

Joseph Mifsud met with Durham's team this past Summer (2019).

www.washingtontimes.com...

Unlike the Washington Post, the Washington Times has a good reputation.


Based on your link, it looks like Durham's team met with Mifsud's attorney who only played a recording for them of Mifsud that was recorded in May 2018.


Durham is combing through former CIA Director John Brennan's communications and documents. He'll get to the bottom of things. As William Barr said last week, "These things take time".

Personally, I would prefer Durham just go to Clapper and ask him about the meeting where Obama gave the order to Spy on the Trump campaign. Work from the top-down.


I reckon they want to go into that meeting already knowing the broad brushes. Work UP from the people who did the dirty work and find evidence of the chain of command.

There is great benefit to working with senior people too if you can get them to cooperate... They will know where the skeletons are likely to be found....Here's something else I have seen...

Admiral Rogers - remember him? - has been working with Durham...


RETIRED ADM. MICHAEL ROGERS, former director of the National Security Agency, has been cooperating with the Justice Department’s probe into the origins of the counterintelligence investigation of the Trump presidential campaign’s alleged ties to Russia, according to four people familiar with Rogers’s participation.

Rogers has met the prosecutor leading the probe, Connecticut U.S. Attorney John Durham, on multiple occasions, according to two people familiar with Rogers’s cooperation. While the substance of those meetings is not clear, Rogers has cooperated voluntarily, several people with knowledge of the matter said.

Rogers, who retired in May 2018, did not respond to requests for comment.


Game well and truly on.

theintercept.com...
edit on 21/12/2019 by UKTruth because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 21 2019 @ 06:26 PM
link   
He was rumoured to be hidden away somewhere by Italian intelligence/government

Then Barr & Durham travelled to Rome with a whole host of other Trump people and Italy denied everything regarding Mifsud a link campus etc etc

Mifsud was working with European intel agency’s and the CIA

twitter.com...

Did they pick him up then?

He’s probably as dead as Epstein out in the open or in hiding on his own
edit on 21-12-2019 by TritonTaranis because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 21 2019 @ 06:28 PM
link   
Double
edit on 21-12-2019 by TritonTaranis because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 30 2019 @ 05:47 AM
link   
a reply to: UKTruth

There were no human assets inserted into the trump campaign.

That is what was determined. You are stating the exact opposite of the truth.



posted on Dec, 31 2019 @ 09:50 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: UKTruth

There were no human assets inserted into the trump campaign.

That is what was determined. You are stating the exact opposite of the truth.


No, Horowitz only determined that the FBI did not use confidential human sources. He's not the Inspector General for the CIA. Durham is currently the one who is investigating their role in all of this, even though he's not the CIA's IG either.



posted on Dec, 31 2019 @ 10:41 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: UKTruth

There were no human assets inserted into the trump campaign.

That is what was determined. You are stating the exact opposite of the truth.


Determined?

By who?

Rachel Maddow?

Lolz🤪

Nice link!



posted on Dec, 31 2019 @ 10:48 AM
link   
The FBI agents themselves were acting as confidential human sources.
They were ..www.nbcnews.com...
Just a play on words.
What was this?...“They sent a supervisory agent to the briefing from the Crossfire Hurricane team, and that agent prepared a report to the file of the briefing. About what Mr. Trump and Mr. Flynn said,” Horowitz testified, referring to the code name for the FBI's counterintelligence investigation. “The incident, the event, the meeting was a briefing, and the FBI considered and decided to send that agent there to do the briefing. So the agent was actually doing the briefing but also using it for the purpose of investigation.”
www.washingtonexaminer.com...
They did exactly what is meant by confidential human sources, don't be fooled by the legales speak.



originally posted by: Deetermined

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: UKTruth

There were no human assets inserted into the trump campaign.

That is what was determined. You are stating the exact opposite of the truth.


No, Horowitz only determined that the FBI did not use confidential human sources. He's not the Inspector General for the CIA. Durham is currently the one who is investigating their role in all of this, even though he's not the CIA's IG either.



posted on Dec, 31 2019 @ 10:55 AM
link   
a reply to: fringeofthefringe

Thank you for reminding me that Horowitz said that the FBI didn't plant anyone INSIDE Trump's campaign, but never said that they weren't working on thwarting his campaign from the outside.



posted on Dec, 31 2019 @ 11:01 AM
link   
We have too many lawyers obfuscating, conflating and confusing the facts with help from the media. They even pay people to post in forums like this one to offset the awakening, to combat the truth from surfacing. You may have noticed a few.
It is almost impossible to keep up.
I just hope that AG Barr and John Durham can bring some clarity to all of this so that we can have some validation in the dots we have been connecting for too long.


originally posted by: Deetermined
a reply to: fringeofthefringe

Thank you for reminding me that Horowitz said that the FBI didn't plant anyone INSIDE Trump's campaign, but never said that they weren't working on thwarting his campaign from the outside.



new topics

top topics



 
11
<< 1   >>

log in

join