It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

It just the same cases again and again and again

page: 3
8
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 23 2019 @ 08:17 AM
link   
a reply to: PandaPrincess

tom delong




posted on Dec, 23 2019 @ 02:06 PM
link   

originally posted by: redchad
d. Or the Zimbabwe event in 1994 a hundred school kids witnessed a landing. .


that event is one of the most compelling ive ever looked into
did you say theres interviews with them as adults now
can you link me it

also i dont understand in 1994 not one person had a camera?
surely the craft and alien was around a while
not one person could get any physical evidence?



posted on Dec, 23 2019 @ 03:53 PM
link   
a reply to: PandaPrincess

Can’t get a link but I watched it with some of the interviews on searching for Aliens (Blaze TV) they go over some of the old cases



posted on Dec, 23 2019 @ 08:34 PM
link   

originally posted by: PandaPrincess
that event is one of the most compelling ive ever looked into
did you say theres interviews with them as adults now
can you link me it


Alongside the 1966 Westall school sighting, I agree that it's compelling.

A new documentary on the case, 'Ariel Phenomenon', has been in the works for some time - alternatively known as Development Hell in the industry - but is currently awaiting a distributor the last I heard.

Here are links to the official site and Twitter account:

www.arielphenomenon.com...

twitter.com...

And here are two trailers - from 2016 (which you may have to access via the included link to YouTube itself), and 2018 (no restrictions on watching via ATS) ...




Phew. Hope that helps.


edit on 23-12-2019 by ConfusedBrit because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 24 2019 @ 11:13 PM
link   

originally posted by: ConfusedBrit

originally posted by: 111DPKING111
It could be the Colares case is the only legit UFO sighting, nothing says aliens have to keep visiting.



One of the wisest observations in the thread. Not that Colares is the Real Thing per se (perhaps it is), but the notion that only a handful of cases over 70+ years hold the strongest evidence is entirely logical. Which also underlines how much pure junk exists in ufology - which is a massive business enterprise, lest we forget.


I mentioned the Colares case because there were pictures taken by the military along with with lots of witnesses. But again, there are rarely any pictures at all even in mass sightings like Belgium or Hudson Valley. If cases like those dont have pictures, why should we expect there to be pictures in other cases with far fewer observers?

Im not prepared with my cell phone to whip it out and try snap a picture in poor lighting, especially if the object is moving at some speed. Its like there is this expectation the ufo is going stop conveniently for a selfie? Good luck with that.



posted on Dec, 25 2019 @ 06:18 AM
link   

originally posted by: 111DPKING111
Im not prepared with my cell phone to whip it out and try snap a picture in poor lighting, especially if the object is moving at some speed. Its like there is this expectation the ufo is going stop conveniently for a selfie? Good luck with that.

Exactly.

Many people talk about it as if everybody with a cellphone is walking around with it in their hand, ready to take photos. An easy test is trying to get a photo of something much more common, like, for example, a car of a specific maker or colour, as you go about your daily life. It's not easy. Adding the fact that most people do not look at the sky makes it even more unlikely they will get any photos of UFOs.

Also, although some cellphones have really good cameras, those are a minority, most have cheap cameras with cheaper lenses.



posted on Dec, 25 2019 @ 09:25 AM
link   
what i dont understand is why is there this excuse given about ufos needing to cloak themselves

ie `nowadays they dont appear like they did in the 40s because everyone has cameras`

i mean really? beings who are clearly if they are real, are going to be far far far more advanced than us, and a lot older maybe thousands of years old, are going to be bothered by wether we see them or not?

why on earth would beings travel through dimensions or thousands of light years just to abduct a random swiss farmer and then fly away



posted on Dec, 25 2019 @ 12:19 PM
link   

originally posted by: PandaPrincess

i mean really? beings who are clearly if they are real, are going to be far far far more advanced than us, and a lot older maybe thousands of years old, are going to be bothered by wether we see them or not?

That's a reasonable question if you assume these hypothetical aliens think roughly the same way we do and are not wildly illogical according to our standards. Following that line of thought, then you must assume whatever they do is somehow for their own benefit, but not necessarily ours. This made me think at one time (and still occasionally) that they're what could loosely be called "time travelers.". At least the more nuts-and-bolts aliens who look sort of like us. They can allow themselves to be seen, but not too much, because too much overt interaction with us might have a direct and negative affect on themselves in the future. But they still need to come back for some reason anyway. And it explains why they're so elusive. If they screw up in some way that blows their cover, they can just go back and fix it before it happens.

These days, I don't know. These days I tend to think it's all about us just not having the right kind of senses and intelligence to see the bigger picture. Bigfoot shouldn't exist, yet people keep seeing them, along with all kinds of other crazy nonsense. It seems to be beyond our logic and reasoning. Glitches in the simulation? Our brains only give us a very limited and distorted view of actual reality (the Greeks probably had a word for that), so in a way we're creating our own approximation / simulation of reality. These things seem to be the stray bits old old code or processing errors you would expect from a poorly planned and written program.



posted on Dec, 25 2019 @ 05:29 PM
link   
anyone asked good ol` billy why hes not provided any new photos/material since 1992?



posted on Dec, 25 2019 @ 11:25 PM
link   
a reply to: PandaPrincess


i mean really? beings who are clearly if they are real, are going to be far far far more advanced than us, and a lot older maybe thousands of years old, are going to be bothered by wether we see them or not?


I would say this is the case in Belgium sightings and many others. The Colares case I mentioned earlier had the military show up and start filming while the sightings continued to happen.


why on earth would beings travel through dimensions or thousands of light years just to abduct a random swiss farmer and then fly away


Humans seem to have all kinds of interest/hobbies - bowling, archaeology, drugs, physics, genetics, cars, ping pong. One of the more interesting hobbies takes place after the oak island mystery snooze fest. These jokers want to experience/confirm the different levels of pain from getting bitten or stung by various critters.



posted on Dec, 26 2019 @ 02:14 AM
link   
At least ufology is not Christianity. They've been repeating the same crap for 2000 years.



posted on Dec, 26 2019 @ 02:54 AM
link   

originally posted by: PandaPrincess
what i dont understand is why is there this excuse given about ufos needing to cloak themselves

ie `nowadays they dont appear like they did in the 40s because everyone has cameras`

i mean really? beings who are clearly if they are real, are going to be far far far more advanced than us, and a lot older maybe thousands of years old, are going to be bothered by wether we see them or not?

why on earth would beings travel through dimensions or thousands of light years just to abduct a random swiss farmer and then fly away


Don't forget they love to perform 10 minute light shows over Arizona, and elsewhere, and fly back to their distant planets, because that makes sense too!



posted on Dec, 26 2019 @ 03:52 AM
link   
I think the waters are so muddied these days in UFOlogy, it's become very difficult to see what's real and what's not. The older cases we all know, love and research all the time have all but been called real and legit sightings.

Why is this?

Because people were more trusting back then and wouldn't lie to us?
Aliens knew there were not many cameras back then?

If someone sees something and puts it on Youtube, we all scream hoax and laugh. Straight away we poo poo it and move on.

With the MSM now becoming more open to the whole UFO community, I feel that could be the reason we see less sightings. Makes me think that the whole thing was a plan by our own governments from the beginning.

Humans are easily manipulated.



posted on Dec, 28 2019 @ 02:31 AM
link   

originally posted by: rhynouk
I think the waters are so muddied these days in UFOlogy, it's become very difficult to see what's real and what's not. The older cases we all know, love and research all the time have all but been called real and legit sightings.

Why is this?

Because people were more trusting back then and wouldn't lie to us?
Aliens knew there were not many cameras back then?

If someone sees something and puts it on Youtube, we all scream hoax and laugh. Straight away we poo poo it and move on.

With the MSM now becoming more open to the whole UFO community, I feel that could be the reason we see less sightings. Makes me think that the whole thing was a plan by our own governments from the beginning.

Humans are easily manipulated.


This was planned from day one, for sure.

The plan was to fake alien landings, make it look like a cover-up, and keep faking it, and covering it up, again and again, so everyone thinks it's alien cover-ups for sure, look at all the evidence!!


Everyone wants 'disclosure' from the government, they are hiding all knowledge of aliens - a secret!

It's complete nonsense.



posted on Dec, 29 2019 @ 12:28 AM
link   
If I were more paranoid, I'd say it was an attempt to "suppress the truth", but seems to me that it has more to do with clicks and ad revenue than anything else.

I get better results if I do a search for "UFO sightings" plus a year or date like "2019." Even then, I have to click past at least the first page of results, and even then, I look at channel names. Typically the best ones are named after the person and it's the only UFO video on thier channel. "Visitors" or "the visitors" is a good comp channel and there's another one that escapes me at the moment.



new topics

top topics



 
8
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join