It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: PokeyJoe
a reply to: CriticalStinker
The thing with the whole "asking for an investigation into Biden" thing is that Trump never ONCE mentioned Joe or Hunter Biden when speaking about investigations. He talked about Burisma specifically. Considering Burisma IS corrupt as hell, I would say it was a valid line of questioning.
Whitehouse.gov
The President: Snipped part of the converstaion to shorten by meThe other thing, There's a lot of talk about Biden's son, that Biden stopped the prosecution and a lot of people want to find out about that so whatever you can do with the Attorney General would be great. Biden went around bragging that he stopped the prosecution so if you can look into it... It sounds horrible to me.
originally posted by: Middleoftheroad
a reply to: dfnj2015
I'm still waiting on you to site the laws he broke and provide the proof he broke them.
originally posted by: Middleoftheroad
a reply to: dfnj2015
I'm still waiting on you to site the laws he broke and provide the proof he broke them.
originally posted by: PokeyJoe
a reply to: CriticalStinker
Maybe thats the whole point of this seemingly pointless exercise? Trump becomes a political martyr that is needed to usher in much needed transparency and reform in our government?
originally posted by: dfnj2015
originally posted by: shooterbrody
originally posted by: silo13
a reply to: dfnj2015
It means the Dem's failed in a traitorous coup and the President and the USA voters are vindicated.
I hope is (also) means there's a bag full of cats that will tossed into the sedition pool.
We'll see.
more winning
are you tired of winning yet?
We now live in an era where putting one's party before the Constitution is the new norm. Again, we now live in a banana Republic. Trump should announce his own Constitution based on a full bloom of Article II powers. Why stop now?
Do I think this was a dumb move on his part? Yup, because I don't think Biden is an actual threat to his presidency. I also don't think he was doing this out of altruism...
originally posted by: Middleoftheroad
a reply to: CriticalStinker
Do I think this was a dumb move on his part? Yup, because I don't think Biden is an actual threat to his presidency. I also don't think he was doing this out of altruism...
You realize this whole ordeal went down before Biden announced his candidacy right? Most of us think he only announced when he did because he thought it would protect his family's crimes in Ukraine from being investigated.
I understand there is a lot of partisan siding on the Trump impeachment. The thing is from my perspective, from the witnesses, it really does look like Trump broke the law and his oath of office.
I understand there is a lot of partisan siding on the Trump impeachment. The thing is from my perspective, from the witnesses, it really does look like Trump broke the law and his oath of office.
The White House Office of Management and Budget (OMB) released a new legal memo on Wednesday indicating that the Trump administration’s decision to temporarily hold military assistance to Ukraine was a “routine” practice and that the administration was reviewing whether Ukraine complied with U.S. policy.
originally posted by: dfnj2015
originally posted by: Middleoftheroad
a reply to: dfnj2015
I'm still waiting on you to site the laws he broke and provide the proof he broke them.
Not that you will agree:
"14 § 431 et seq. The Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 (FECA, Pub. ... § 30101 et seq.) is the primary United States federal law regulating political campaign spending and fundraising. The law originally focused on increased disclosure of contributions for federal campaigns."