posted on Dec, 18 2019 @ 12:01 AM
a reply to: Alien Abduct
Until we can establish how ''your fact'' does not conform to the reality
Even as you admitted the error of your statement of ''fact'' was incorrect after having had the true timeline presented to you, we did not establish
''how'' you came to believe that the falsehood was indeed a ''fact''.
Can you see? For some reason, you believed a totally erroneous meme, that one came before another when in reality the other came first, by three
months. This question of course leads to just where are you getting your facts. Who are you listening to that would pass along falsehood like that. A
falsehood that fits nicely into conglomeration of other falsehoods wrapped up in a package that is being sold to millions.
Likewise, I think that there are many falsehoods wrapped up into packages that are sold to others and that people who have bought one package are
fighting and arguing with people who have bought the other. See?
Myself, I find that there is so much information out, so many rabbit holes that I really cannot say with true assurity which package contains more
falsehoods than the other. This to me is one of those rabbit holes as i attempted to point out earlier. Experts to the left of me, experts to the
right. If they can't establish which package is true and which is not, then I prefer to leave it alone.
You however seemed to have wanted to drag me into it for what reason I'm not sure when I had not even commented
quid pro quo at all. All I could have done was parrot what some have said, just, I tihnk, as that is all you could do as well. I find no satisfaction
in two parrots having an in depth discussion about stuff that the exerts can't even agree about,